Pulmonary and Ventilatory Effects of Bed Verticalization in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT04371016
Last Updated: 2021-08-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-30
2021-01-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The management of a patient with ARDS requires first of all an optimization of oxygenation, which relies primarily on mechanical ventilation, whether invasive or non-invasive (for less severe patients). Since the ARDS network study published in 2000 in the New England Journal of Medicine, it has been internationally accepted that tidal volumes must be reduced in order to limit the risk of alveolar over-distension and ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). A tidal volume of approximately 6 mL.kg-1 ideal body weight (IBW) should be applied. Routine neuromuscular blockade of the most severe patients (PaO2/FiO2 \< 120 mmHg) is usually the rule, although it is increasingly being questioned. Comprehensive ventilatory management is based on the concepts of baby lung and open lung, introduced respectively by Gattinoni and Lachmann. According to these concepts, it must be considered that the lung volume available for mechanical ventilation is very small compared to the healthy lung for a given patient (baby lung) and that the reduction in tidal volume must be associated with the use of sufficient PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuvers to keep the lung "open" and limit the formation of atelectasis.
In addition to this optimization of mechanical ventilation, it is possible to reduce the impact of mechanical stress on the lung. The prone position, for example, makes it possible to free from certain visceral and mediastinal constraints, to optimize the distribution of ventilation as well as the ventilation to perfusion ratios.
Thanks to the technological progress of intensive care beds, it is now possible to verticalize ventilated and sedated patients in complete safety. Verticalization could reduce the constraints imposed to the lungs, by reproducing the more physiological vertical station, and thus modifying the distribution of ventilation.
Indeed, in two physiological studies published in 2006 and 2013 in Intensive Care Medicine, 30 to 40% of patients with ARDS appeared to respond to partial body verticalization at 45° and 60° (in a semi-seated or seated position). In addition to improving arterial oxygenation, verticalization appeared to decrease ventilatory stress, related to supine position, and increase alveolar recruitment, with improved lung compliance and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) over time. Nevertheless, 90° verticalization has never been studied, nor have positions without body flexion (seated or semi-seated). In these studies, only patients with the highest lung compliance appeared to respond. These data support the current hypothesis of subgroups of patients with ARDS with different pathophysiological characteristics (morphological and phenotypic) and therapeutic responses.
The investigators hypothesize that verticalization of patients with ARDS improves ventilatory mechanics by reducing the constraints imposed on the lung (transpulmonary pressure), pulmonary aeration, arterial oxygenation and ventilatory parameters.
The first objective is to study the influence of the bed position of the patient with early ARDS on the variations in respiratory mechanics represented by the transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPtp). The second objective is to evaluate changes in ventilatory physiology, tolerance and feasibility of verticalization in patients with early ARDS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessing the Role of Inclined Positioning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients Recovery
NCT04612608
Incidence of Dyssynchronies in Early ARDS
NCT03447288
Comparison Between Limited Driving Pressure Ventilation and Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Medical Intensive Care Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT04035915
ARDSnet Protocol vs. Open Lung Approach in ARDS
NCT00431158
Paramedical Protocol for Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT06039215
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This therapeutic study aims to test patient's position using dedicated beds (Total Lift Bed™, VitalGo Systems Inc., Arjo AB). The study consists of comparing pulmonary pathophysiological parameters for different positions (from the strict dorsal decubitus to the vertical, with 30° and 60° steps) in patients with early ARDS of focal and non-focal morphologies, under invasive mechanical ventilation.
The primary outcome is the difference between the transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPtp) measured at the end of each verticalization step (30th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol, in strict dorsal decubitus (0°).
The minimum number of subjects to enroll in this study is 30 patients with early ARDS, including 15 with focal lung morphology and 15 with non-focal lung morphology. Intermediate analyses are planned every 5 patients in order to reevaluate the needed number of patients.
The use of a dedicated bed (Total Lift Bed™, VitalGo Systems, Inc., Arjo AB) allows the verticalization of patients under sedation and mechanical ventilation up to 90°. The procedure foresees the gradual verticalization of the patients of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° by steps of 30 minutes. At the end of each position step (0°, 30°, 60° and 90°), measurement of end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) and chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) parameters, measurement of esophageal pressures, collection of ventilatory parameters on the ventilator, collection of Swan-Ganz catheter hemodynamic data, measurement of lung shunt by mixed venous and arterial blood gas analyses and measurement of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) by the N2 washin-washout method.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Verticalization group
After checking the availability of the bed dedicated to verticalization (Total Lift Bed™, VitalGo Systems, Inc., Arjo AB), the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria, as well as the morphology of lung injury, the patient is included. The following procedures are performed :
* insertion of an esophageal balloon catheter (Nutrivent®, Sidam)
* installation of an EIT belt in the 4th or 5th intercostal space (Pulmovista® 500, Dräger)
* insertion of a Swan-Ganz catheter
* continuous recording of digital and analogic data
After collecting initial data from the patient in a strict lying position at 0°, successive 30-minutes position steps at 30°, 60° and 90° will be performed. At the end of the 30 minutes, and for each step, all the data is collected.
Verticalization (bed)
The use of a dedicated bed (Total Lift Bed™, VitalGo Systems, Inc., Arjo AB) allows the verticalization of patients under sedation and mechanical ventilation up to 90°. The procedure foresees the gradual verticalization of the patients of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° by steps of 30 minutes.
At the end of each position step (0°, 30°, 60° and 90°), measurement of end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) and chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) parameters, measurement of esophageal pressures, collection of ventilatory parameters on the ventilator, collection of Swan-Ganz catheter hemodynamic data, measurement of lung shunt by mixed venous and arterial blood gas analyses and measurement of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) by the N2 washin-washout method
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Verticalization (bed)
The use of a dedicated bed (Total Lift Bed™, VitalGo Systems, Inc., Arjo AB) allows the verticalization of patients under sedation and mechanical ventilation up to 90°. The procedure foresees the gradual verticalization of the patients of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° by steps of 30 minutes.
At the end of each position step (0°, 30°, 60° and 90°), measurement of end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) and chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) parameters, measurement of esophageal pressures, collection of ventilatory parameters on the ventilator, collection of Swan-Ganz catheter hemodynamic data, measurement of lung shunt by mixed venous and arterial blood gas analyses and measurement of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) by the N2 washin-washout method
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient equipped with an arterial catheter.
* Patient sedated (BIS between 30 and 50) and, if necessary, under neuromuscular blocking agent (TOF \< 2/4 at the orbicular) to avoid inspiratory effort.
* Patient hemodynamically optimized following the Swan-Ganz catheter data.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unavailability of the bed dedicated to verticalization (Total Lift Bed™, VitalGo Systems Inc., Arjo AB)
* Obesity with BMI ≥ 35 kg.m-2
* Significant hemodynamic instability defined as an increase of more than 20% in catecholamine doses in the last hour, despite optimization of blood volume, for a target mean blood pressure between 65 and 75 mmHg.
* Contraindication to the insertion of a nasogastric tube
* Contraindication to the use of the chest electrical impedance tomography
* Contraindication to the insertion of a Swan-Ganz catheter
* Contraindication to the application of compression stockings
* Patient under guardianship
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jules Audard
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bouchant L, Godet T, Arpajou G, Aupetitgendre L, Cayot S, Guerin R, Jabaudon M, Verlhac C, Blondonnet R, Borao L, Pereira B, Constantin JM, Bazin JE, Futier E, Audard J. Physiological effects and safety of bed verticalization in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2024 Aug 5;28(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05013-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RBHP AUDARD 2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.