Comparison Between Limited Driving Pressure Ventilation and Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Medical Intensive Care Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT ID: NCT04035915
Last Updated: 2021-09-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
126 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-25
2021-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Practice of Ventilation in Middle-Income Countries
NCT03188770
Pulmonary and Ventilatory Effects of Bed Verticalization in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT04371016
ARDSnet Protocol vs. Open Lung Approach in ARDS
NCT00431158
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Effects of Transvenous Phrenic Stimulation
NCT04680351
Risk Factors for Prolonged Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT04411459
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To compare lung injury score (LIS, Murray score) after invasive mechanical ventilation 7 days between groups of limited driving pressure ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation strategies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Limited driving pressure ventilation
Limited driving pressure
Keep driving pressure \<15 cmH2O
Conventional mechanical ventilation strategies
Conventional mechanical ventilation strategies
Keep tidalvolume \</= 8
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Limited driving pressure
Keep driving pressure \<15 cmH2O
Conventional mechanical ventilation strategies
Keep tidalvolume \</= 8
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* On Invasive mechanical ventilator less than 24 hr. before randomization
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with tracheostomy tube
* Pregnancy
* Do not attempt resuscitation order
* Patient with ECMO before randomization
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Surat Tongyoo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mahidol University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mahidol university
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tongyoo S, Viarasilpa T, Deawtrakulchai P, Subpinyo S, Suppasilp C, Permpikul C. Comparison of limited driving pressure ventilation and low tidal volume strategies in adults with acute respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17534666241249152. doi: 10.1177/17534666241249152.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SI828/2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.