Supported Ventilation in ARDS Patients

NCT ID: NCT02064140

Last Updated: 2014-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by acute bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and impairment of oxygen uptake. For example, pneumonia can cause the development of ARDS. Despite modern intensive care treatment, mortality in ARDS patients remains high (40%). Invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is the mainstay of ARDS treatment. Controlled MV is the conventional ventilation strategy to ensure lung protective ventilation (low tidal volumes) and recovery of the lungs. However, among disadvantages of controlled MV are the development of respiratory muscle atrophy (due to disuse) and the need for high dose sedatives to prevent patient-ventilator asynchrony. The use of high doses of sedatives and respiratory muscle weakness are associated with increased morbidity, worse clinical outcomes and prolonged MV.

Besides controlled MV, a patient can be ventilated with supported ventilation. Supported MV decreases the likelihood to develop muscle atrophy, improves oxygenation and hemodynamics, and lowers consumption of sedatives. However potential disadvantages of supported ventilation include generation of too high tidal volumes, especially in patients with high respiratory drive. A previous study in healthy subjects has shown that titration of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) can decrease activity of inspiratory muscles, while maintaining adequate ventilation. It is hypothesized that low dose NMBA may enable supported MV with adequate tidal volumes, in patients with high respiratory drive.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Mechanical Ventilation Tidal Volume

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neuromuscular blocking agent

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rocuronium

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rocuronium

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \> 18 year
* informed consent
* ARDS according to the Berlin definition
* RASS -4/-5
* tidal volume \> 8 ml/kg during supported ventilation
* double balloon esophageal EMG NAVA catheter

Exclusion Criteria

* recent use of muscle relaxants / NMBAs (\< 3 hours)
* pre-existent neuromuscular disease (congenital or acquired) or diseases / disorders know to be associated with myopathy including auto-immune diseases
* phrenic nerve lesions
* elevated intracranial pressure or clinical suspicion of elevated intracranial pressure (i.e. neurotrauma)
* open chest or abdomen
* pregnancy
* systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg / MAP \< 65 mm Hg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Medical Center Nijmegen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Leo Heunks

L. Heunks, MD PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

L MA Heunks, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Center Nijmegen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboud university medical center

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MV NMBA JNLH13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id