Full-time Bangerter Filters Versus Part-time Daily Patching for Moderate Amblyopia in Children

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

186 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of Bangerter filters compared to 2 hours of daily patching as a primary treatment for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/80) in children ages 3 to \< 10 years.

Secondary objectives of this study are (1) to determine the time course of visual improvement with Bangerter filter treatment, (2) to compare patient quality of life, measured by a modified Amblyopia Treatment Index, between patients treated with patching vs. Bangerter filters, (3) to determine whether blurring the sound eye to a visual acuity worse than the amblyopic eye predicts improvement in acuity, and (4) to determine whether a change in fixation to the amblyopic eye is predictive of improvement in visual acuity.

The primary outcome assessment is visual acuity at 24 weeks for both the amblyopic and sound eyes.

The primary analytic approach for the amblyopic eye acuity will involve construction of a one-sided 95% confidence interval to assess non-inferiority based on a treatment group comparison of logMAR visual acuity scores adjusted for baseline visual acuity scores in an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model.

Sound eye acuity data will be reported for each treatment regimen at the 24-week visit as mean change (logMAR lines) from baseline and as the distribution of the number of lines of change from baseline.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Trial Comparing Patching With Active Vision Therapy to Patching With Control Vision Therapy as Treatment for Amblyopia

NCT00587171

Amblyopia

TERMINATED PHASE3

Trial Comparing Part-time Versus Full-time Patching for Severe Amblyopia

NCT00094744

Amblyopia

COMPLETED PHASE3

Trial Comparing Part-time Versus Minimal-time Patching for Moderate Amblyopia

NCT00094679

Amblyopia

COMPLETED PHASE3

Trial Comparing Near Versus Distance Activities While Patching for Amblyopia in Children 3 to <7 Years Old

NCT00315198

Amblyopia

COMPLETED PHASE3

Combined Patching-Atropine for Residual Amblyopia

NCT00506675

Amblyopia

TERMINATED PHASE3

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in children, estimated to affect as many as 3.6% of the childhood population. The natural history of amblyopia is relatively unknown although it has been reported that visual acuity may deteriorate further without treatment.

Although occlusion or patching of the sound eye has been the mainstay for amblyopia therapy, alternative treatment such as pharmacological or optical penalization may be as effective. In a randomized, controlled clinical trial of 419 children, 3 years to less than 7 years old with moderate amblyopia, patching was compared to atropine. Although improvement with atropine was initially slower, both treatments produced similar improvement after 6 months.

Although both patching and atropine have been proven effective for treating amblyopia, neither treatment is without adverse side effects. Patching is associated with compliance difficulties, the need for continuous monitoring, and social stigma. Negative side effects observed in children treated with atropine include light sensitivity, facial flushing, and fever. In a randomized clinical trial comparing patching to atropine as a treatment for amblyopia, a questionnaire to assess the impact of patching and atropine treatment on the child and family indicated that both treatments were well tolerated overall, however, patching had lower compliance and higher social stigma than atropine.

Bangerter filters, also known as Bangerter foils, have been used mainly as secondary amblyopia therapy following patching or atropine to either further improve or maintain the visual gain. One advantage of Bangerter filters compared to patching is that the lower density filters are not readily apparent and therefore would be expected to increase patient compliance due to reduced social stigma. Another advantage of Bangerter filters is that there is no opportunity for skin irritation from bandage adhesive, a commonly-reported side effect of patching. In addition, there is a theoretical advantage that Bangerter filters are less disruptive to binocular function during treatment compared to other modalities such as patching.

Few data are available comparing Bangerter filters with patching for the treatment of amblyopia. Bonsall randomized 14 patients, 3 to 10 years old, with previously untreated strabismic/anisometropic amblyopia to either 6 hours of daily patching or full-time Bangerter filters. Baseline amblyopic eye acuity was 20/30 to 20/400 for the patching group and 20/30 to 20/200 for the Bangerter group. The Bangerter filter prescribed was the minimum density foil needed to elicit a switch in fixation from the sound eye to the amblyopic eye. Visual acuity was measured every 6-8 weeks until the amblyopic eye visual acuity was equal to that of the sound eye, an improvement that was achieved in 5 of the 14 at the time the study was stopped. The average time to achieve equal vision between the amblyopic and sound eyes was about 4.5 months (142 days) for the foil group versus about 9 months (272 days) for the patching group. Both forms of therapy were equally tolerated. Despite good preliminary data, a large randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of Bangerter filters to patching for the treatment of amblyopia has yet to be conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amblyopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patching

2 hours daily patching of the sound eye plus one hour near activities while patching

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Patching

Intervention Type DEVICE

2 hours daily patching of the sound eye

Near activities

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

one hour near visual activities

Bangerter filters

Bangerter filter worn on sound eye spectacles lens full time plus at least one hour near activities

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bangerter filters

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bangerter filter worn on sound eye spectacle lens full time

Near activities

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

one hour near visual activities

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bangerter filters

Bangerter filter worn on sound eye spectacle lens full time

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patching

2 hours daily patching of the sound eye

Intervention Type DEVICE

Near activities

one hour near visual activities

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Coverlet, 3M Opticlude, Ortopad®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 3 to \< 10 years
* Amblyopia associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both
* No ocular cause apparent for reduced visual acuity
* Visual acuity 20/40 to 20/80 (71 to 54 letters inclusive) in amblyopic eye
* Visual acuity 20/40 or better (\>= 69 letters) in sound eye
* Interocular difference \>= 3 logMAR lines (\>= 15 letters)
* No amblyopia treatment other than spectacles in last 6 months

\*Any treatment more than 6 months prior to enrollment is acceptable
* Currently wearing spectacles
* Appropriate spectacles have been worn for 16 weeks prior to enrollment or visual acuity documented to be stable
* No myopia \> -6.00 D spherical equivalent in either eye
* Cycloplegic refraction within 6 months prior to enrollment
* Ocular examination within 6 months prior to enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

* Current vision therapy or orthoptics
* Ocular cause for reduced visual acuity
* Prior intraocular or refractive surgery
* Known skin reactions to patch or bandage adhesives

Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No