Patching for Lazy Eye: Trial to Evaluate Daily Patching Amounts
NCT ID: NCT00274664
Last Updated: 2006-01-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-02-28
2005-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To overcome this, we have designed an instrument that permits us to measure occlusion: an occlusion dose monitor (ODM) which provides an objective record of how much occlusion a child actually receives. Recently we have observed that 75% of improvement induced by occlusion occurs in the first four weeks of treatment. In this study we explore the possibility that by intensive treatment the period of amblyopia therapy can be shortened - i.e. treatment will be more efficient, more effective, and more 'family-friendly'. The study hypothesis is that 12 hours/day of patching is more effective than 6 hours/day.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study we explore the possibility that by intensive treatment the period of amblyopia therapy can be shortened - i.e. made both more efficient and hopefully more effective. The purpose of the present study, the Randomized Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (ROTAS), is to compare two frequently employed patching regimens: 'substantial' (6 hrs/day) against 'maximal' (12 hrs/day) patching. Our experimental design incorporates objective occlusion monitoring and is able to discriminate the beneficial effect of refractive correction from that of occlusion. The study comprises three phases: 'baseline', 'refractive adaptation' and 'occlusion.' Our aim is to provide guidelines for patient management based, for the first time, on experimentally determined and statistically verifiable relationships between treatment and outcome.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
6 hours occlusion by patching
12 hours occlusion by patching
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of anisometropia and/or strabismus;
* inter-ocular acuity difference of at least 0.1 logMAR
* parental consent
Exclusion Criteria
* ocular pathology
* learning difficulties
3 Years
8 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College London
OTHER
City, University of London
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Merrick J Moseley, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
City, University of London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Marys Hospitals
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
Hillingdon Hospital
London, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moseley MJ, Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA; MOTAS cooperative. Intermediate spatial frequency letter contrast sensitivity: its relation to visual resolution before and during amblyopia treatment. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Jan;26(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00343.x.
Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ. Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: factors influencing visual outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3152-60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0357.
Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Stephens DA; MOTAS Cooperative. Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;88(12):1552-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.044214.
Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR. Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3048-54. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0250.
Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ. Design of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;86(8):915-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.8.915.
Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR. Defining and measuring treatment outcome in unilateral amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;87(10):1229-31. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.10.1229.
Wallace MP, Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR; Monitored Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study (MOTAS) Cooperatives; Randomized Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study (ROTAS) Cooperatives. Compliance with occlusion therapy for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep 17;54(9):6158-66. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11861.
Stewart CE, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Moseley MJ; ROTAS Cooperative. Objectively monitored patching regimens for treatment of amblyopia: randomised trial. BMJ. 2007 Oct 6;335(7622):707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39301.460150.55. Epub 2007 Sep 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Fight for Sight: 20500
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ROTAS-091206
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id