Trial Comparing Part-time Versus Full-time Patching for Severe Amblyopia

NCT ID: NCT00094744

Last Updated: 2010-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

175 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-05-31

Study Completion Date

2003-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goals of this study are:

* To determine whether the visual acuity improvement obtained with part-time (6 hours) patching is equivalent to the visual acuity improvement obtained with full-time patching (all or all but one waking hour) for severe amblyopia.
* To develop more precise estimates than currently available for the visual acuity improvement that occurs during treatment of amblyopia with patching.
* To identify factors that may be associated with successful treatment of amblyopia with patching.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in both children and young and middle-aged adults. Patching has been the mainstay of amblyopia therapy. It is generally held that the response to treatment is best when it is instituted at an early age, particularly by age two or three, and is poor when attempted after eight years of age.

For severe amblyopia, it is generally accepted that occlusion with patching is the standard of care. Other modalities of treatment, such as atropine penalization and optical penalization, are widely considered insufficient as initial treatments for severe amblyopia. However, controversy exists with regard to how many hours per day of patching should be prescribed. Advocates of full-time patching purport that such a regimen is needed to restore visual acuity more rapidly and more effectively. Advocates of part-time patching believe it to be better tolerated by the child and family, therefore producing less stress on the parent-child relationship and producing better results through better compliance. Part-time patching may also promote the development of binocularity in patients who have "straight-eyes", reduce the chance of a straight-eyed patient developing manifest strabismus or losing stereopsis, and reduce the incidence of reverse- or occlusion-amblyopia.

The study is a randomized trial comparing daily patching regimes for children with severe amblyopia. It will consist of about 160 children. Patients in the severe (20/100 to 20/400) group will patch part-time (6 hours) or full-time (all or all but one waking hour) of each day for the 4 month study period. There are at least two follow up visits during the 4-month period. Visual acuity is the major study outcome. It is assessed at the 4-month exam.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amblyopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

6hrs daily patching

6 hours per day of patching in the sound eye

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Eye patch

Intervention Type DEVICE

adhesive eye patch used to cover the sound eye

Full-time daily patching

Patching of the sound eye all but one waking hour

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Eye patch

Intervention Type DEVICE

adhesive eye patch used to cover the sound eye

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eye patch

adhesive eye patch used to cover the sound eye

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Coverlet Opticlude

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must be less than 7 years of age with the original cause of amblyopia as strabismus or anisometropia (a refractive error difference of more than one diopter between the two eyes.)
* Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye must be between 20/100 and 20/400.
* Visual acuity in the sound eye of 20/40 or better.
* There must be at least 3 lines of acuity difference between the two eyes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patching treatment (other than spectacles) within six months prior to enrollment and other amblyopia treatment of any type used within one month prior to enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jaeb Center for Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jaeb Center for Health Research

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael X Repka, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Wilmer Eye Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wilmer Eye Institute

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Quinn GE, Repka MX, Scheiman MM, Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2075-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14597512 (View on PubMed)

Repka M, Simons K, Kraker R; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Laterality of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;150(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 May 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20451898 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2U10EY011751

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

NEI-88

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id