Trial Comparing Part-time Versus Minimal-time Patching for Moderate Amblyopia

NCT ID: NCT00094679

Last Updated: 2010-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

189 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-05-31

Study Completion Date

2002-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goals of this study are:

* To determine whether the visual acuity improvement obtained with part-time (6 hours) patching is equivalent to the visual acuity improvement obtained with minimal patching (2 hours) for moderate amblyopia.
* To develop more precise estimates than currently available for the visual acuity improvement that occurs during treatment of amblyopia with patching.
* To identify factors that may be associated with successful treatment of amblyopia with patching.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in both children and young and middle-aged adults. Patching has been the mainstay of amblyopia therapy. It is generally held that the response to treatment is best when it is instituted at an early age, particularly by age two or three, and is poor when attempted after eight years of age.

For moderate amblyopia, patching is the most commonly prescribed treatment although other modalities such as atropine penalization are also prescribed. There is no specific patching regimen that is widely accepted for treatment of moderate amblyopia and limited or no data available to favor the use of one specific regimen; both minimal occlusion (e.g., 2 hours per day) and six or more hours per day of patching are prescribed in clinical practice.

The study is a randomized trial comparing daily patching regimes for children with moderate amblyopia. It will consist of about 160 children. Patients in the moderate (20/40-20/80) group will patch part-time (6 hours) or minimal time (2 hours) of each day for the 4-month study period. There are at least two follow up visits during the 4-month period. Visual acuity is the major study outcome. It is assessed at the 4-month exam.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amblyopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2hrs daily patching

2 hours patching per day to cover the sound eye

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Eye patch

Intervention Type DEVICE

adhesive patch to cover the sound eye

6hrs daily patching

6 hours per day patching to cover the sound eye

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Eye patch

Intervention Type DEVICE

adhesive patch to cover the sound eye

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eye patch

adhesive patch to cover the sound eye

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Coverlet Opticlude

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must be less than 7 years of age with the original cause of amblyopia as strabismus or anisometropia.
* Visual Acuity in the amblyopic eye must be between 20/40 and 20/80.
* Visual acuity in the sound eye of 20/40 or better.
* There must be at least 3 lines of acuity difference between the two eyes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patching treatment (other than spectacles) within six months prior to enrollment and other amblyopia treatment of any type used within one month prior to enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jaeb Center for Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jaeb Center for Health Research

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael X Repka, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Wilmer Eye Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wilmer Eye Institute

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Repka MX, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cotter SA, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Moke PS, Quinn GE, Scheiman MM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 May;121(5):603-11. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.5.603.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12742836 (View on PubMed)

Repka M, Simons K, Kraker R; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Laterality of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;150(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 May 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20451898 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2U10EY011751

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

ATS2B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id