Study of Knowledge Translation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
NCT ID: NCT00434460
Last Updated: 2010-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1320 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-04-30
2010-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
NCT03294837
Effect of Selected Evidence-based Practices and Related Nurses' Education on the Incidence and Severity of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
NCT05877105
Diagnostic Modalities for VAP Detection
NCT04911244
Predictors of Mortality Among Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Patients
NCT06246994
Hyperoxemia and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
NCT03434821
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In order to improve the care of our patients, it is necessary for research evidence to be translated into clinical practice. There are gaps in our understanding of knowledge translation (KT) and this is evident in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), specifically as it applies to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP is associated with a high burden of illness in the critically ill and there is an extensive amount of research evidence on this disease. It has been demonstrated that best practice as defined by research evidence is not uniformly applied to VAP. In addition, recent advances in VAP knowledge need be disseminated and implemented in order to improve patient safety and outcomes from VAP. A systematic process of knowledge transfer is crucial to translate this research into evidence-based bedside practice and the development and implementation of evidence based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) may facilitate VAP knowledge uptake. In addition, there is a need to study knowledge translation (KT) in the ICU since there is little information about optimal KT and CPG implementation strategies in this environment and efforts that are effective in other clinical areas may not result in meaningful change in the ICU.
Research Question:
What is the effect of VAP CPGs implemented by a multidisciplinary behaviour change strategy (consisting of multifaceted educational strategies led by local opinion leaders and augmented with reminders) on VAP guideline concordance and on clinical VAP outcomes in the ICU?
Research Plan:
Data will only be collected on consecutive patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 hours. The following health care professionals will be studied to assess the behaviour change strategy for the VAP CPGs: physicians (intensivists, ICU fellows, ICU rotating residents), nurses, respiratory therapists, dieticians, physiotherapists and ICU administrators.
The study will be conducted in 3 phases:
1. Development of a behaviour change strategy consisting of three components:
* Local opinion leader team
* Educational strategy
* Reminder system
2. Prospective implementation of the behaviour change strategy over a 24 month period
3. Prospective evaluation of the behaviour change strategy over a 24 month period
* Concordance with VAP guidelines over time
* Factors associated with VAP guideline concordance
* Clinical VAP outcomes pre- and post-guideline implementation
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours.
Education
Implementation of clinical practice guideline for ventilator associated pneumonia through education.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Education
Implementation of clinical practice guideline for ventilator associated pneumonia through education.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mechanically ventilated \> 48 hours \< 96 hours
Exclusion Criteria
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kingston Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
Bayer
INDUSTRY
Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Muscedere, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University
Tasmin Sinuff, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
Daren Heyland, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University
Deborah Cook, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University
Peter Dodek, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Paul's University, University of British Columbia
Redouane Bouali, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa
Sean Keenan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia
Kevin Eva, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University
Brenda Morgan, RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario
Lori Hand, RRT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Geisinger Health Centre, Temple University
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
St. Paul Hospital, University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver Island Health Research Centre
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
William Osler Health Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hotel Dieu Grace Hospital
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sinuff T, Muscedere J, Cook DJ, Dodek PM, Anderson W, Keenan SP, Wood G, Tan R, Haupt MT, Miletin M, Bouali R, Jiang X, Day AG, Overvelde J, Heyland DK; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318265e874.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ABATE VAP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.