Study of Knowledge Translation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

NCT ID: NCT00434460

Last Updated: 2010-09-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1320 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this prospective, multicentre, time-series study is to develop, implement, refine, and evaluate a sustainable behaviour change strategy in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

In order to improve the care of our patients, it is necessary for research evidence to be translated into clinical practice. There are gaps in our understanding of knowledge translation (KT) and this is evident in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), specifically as it applies to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP is associated with a high burden of illness in the critically ill and there is an extensive amount of research evidence on this disease. It has been demonstrated that best practice as defined by research evidence is not uniformly applied to VAP. In addition, recent advances in VAP knowledge need be disseminated and implemented in order to improve patient safety and outcomes from VAP. A systematic process of knowledge transfer is crucial to translate this research into evidence-based bedside practice and the development and implementation of evidence based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) may facilitate VAP knowledge uptake. In addition, there is a need to study knowledge translation (KT) in the ICU since there is little information about optimal KT and CPG implementation strategies in this environment and efforts that are effective in other clinical areas may not result in meaningful change in the ICU.

Research Question:

What is the effect of VAP CPGs implemented by a multidisciplinary behaviour change strategy (consisting of multifaceted educational strategies led by local opinion leaders and augmented with reminders) on VAP guideline concordance and on clinical VAP outcomes in the ICU?

Research Plan:

Data will only be collected on consecutive patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 hours. The following health care professionals will be studied to assess the behaviour change strategy for the VAP CPGs: physicians (intensivists, ICU fellows, ICU rotating residents), nurses, respiratory therapists, dieticians, physiotherapists and ICU administrators.

The study will be conducted in 3 phases:

1. Development of a behaviour change strategy consisting of three components:

* Local opinion leader team
* Educational strategy
* Reminder system
2. Prospective implementation of the behaviour change strategy over a 24 month period
3. Prospective evaluation of the behaviour change strategy over a 24 month period

* Concordance with VAP guidelines over time
* Factors associated with VAP guideline concordance
* Clinical VAP outcomes pre- and post-guideline implementation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours.

Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Implementation of clinical practice guideline for ventilator associated pneumonia through education.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Education

Implementation of clinical practice guideline for ventilator associated pneumonia through education.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>= 17 years old
* Mechanically ventilated \> 48 hours \< 96 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous enrollment in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kingston Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Muscedere, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University

Tasmin Sinuff, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto

Daren Heyland, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University

Deborah Cook, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University

Peter Dodek, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Paul's University, University of British Columbia

Redouane Bouali, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa

Sean Keenan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia

Kevin Eva, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

Brenda Morgan, RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario

Lori Hand, RRT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Geisinger Health Centre, Temple University

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. Paul Hospital, University of British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver Island Health Research Centre

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

William Osler Health Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hotel Dieu Grace Hospital

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sinuff T, Muscedere J, Cook DJ, Dodek PM, Anderson W, Keenan SP, Wood G, Tan R, Haupt MT, Miletin M, Bouali R, Jiang X, Day AG, Overvelde J, Heyland DK; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318265e874.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23222254 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ABATE VAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

VAP Identification by AI
NCT06917521 COMPLETED