Functional Assessment Questionnaire for the Visually Challenged

NCT ID: NCT00407901

Last Updated: 2008-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-04-30

Study Completion Date

2006-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to evaluate how accurately a proposed "Functionality Assessment Questionnaire" measures the differences between low-functioning and high-functioning visually challenged individuals who are legally blind.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The specific aim of this research is to establish the scientific validity of an evaluation assessment tool that will measure the functional level of the visually challenged population. For this study a quantitative, self-evaluation tool has been designed to assess the functional skills at performing a variety of activities. It is called the Functional Assessment Questionnaire. The questionnaire is an innovative approach to measuring the level of these functional skills. It also includes critical benchmarks of real-world success that are not considered in assessing functional levels of the visually challenged, but are measures of evidence-based outcomes. It is a comprehensive measurement tool covering many areas of daily living, including:

1. Education Level
2. Employment Level
3. Income Level
4. Personal Living Skills
5. Kitchen Skills
6. Mobility Level
7. Reading/Writing Skills
8. Oral Communication Skills
9. Social Skills
10. Technology Level
11. Financial Management Skills
12. Recreation Skills
13. Organizational Skills
14. Independence Level

Each of these categories include a progressive scale of 10 activities, 1 being the lowest level of functionality and 10 being the highest level of functionality. Most of the categories are easily self-evaluated, though some will require one-on-one discussion with the test administrator. At the completion of the Functional Assessment Questionnaire, a functionality score, ranging between 14 and 140 is tabulated for each individual.

In order to maintain scientific integrity of the Functional Assessment Questionnaire, certain non-identifiable information will be collected on each human subject. This information includes:

1. Age
2. Sex
3. Visual Acuity (BCVA)
4. Peripheral Field
5. Diagnosed Eye Condition

Comparative statistical analysis will be performed with the Functional Assessment Questionnaire results and the widely used SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey Instrument) and NEI-VFQ-25 with Appendix (National Eye Institute/Visual Function Questionnaire-25) questionnaires. The goal will be to check which questionnaire is more sensitive and accurate in measuring functional level outcomes both prior to (low-functioning individuals) and after (high functioning individuals) vision rehabilitation program participation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blindness, Legal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A, B

A: High functioning visually challenged (legally blind) B: Low-functioning visually challenged (legally blind)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between ages of 18 and 80.
* Capacity to complete the informed consent process
* Legally blind (best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or greater, and/or vision field of 20 degrees or less).
* Long-term or short-term blindness with no or minimal vision rehabilitation. (These will be considered low-functioning subjects). or
* Legally blind with extensive vision rehabilitation, independent and self-sufficient. (These will be considered high-functioning subjects).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have incapacitating physical and mental challenges other than vision loss.
* Patients who are not legally blind.
* Patients who have had some vision rehabilitation, thus falling in between a high-functioning and low-functioning category.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

George Washington University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

The George Washington University University Medical Faculty Associates

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Craig Geist, M.D., M.S.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

George Washington University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lingebach D, Olszowy R, Zollman R and Geist CE. Functional Assessment Questionaire for Low Vision. Abstract. Envision Conference, Kansas City, September 22-23, 2006 Poster Session.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GWUIRB#120526

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.