Functional Assessment Questionnaire for the Visually Challenged
NCT ID: NCT00407901
Last Updated: 2008-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
31 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-04-30
2006-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interaction of the Cognitive and Sensory-cognitive Tasks With Postural Stability in Individuals With Stability Disorders
NCT05024240
Evaluation of Executive Functions in Children With Cochleovestibular Deficit
NCT05665907
Study of Hierarchy of Afferents in Postural Control of Children With Dyslexia
NCT02879786
Neurovisual Function in CHARGE Syndrome
NCT05764980
Investigating the Role of the Premotor Cortex in Higher Cognitive Functions
NCT00842413
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Education Level
2. Employment Level
3. Income Level
4. Personal Living Skills
5. Kitchen Skills
6. Mobility Level
7. Reading/Writing Skills
8. Oral Communication Skills
9. Social Skills
10. Technology Level
11. Financial Management Skills
12. Recreation Skills
13. Organizational Skills
14. Independence Level
Each of these categories include a progressive scale of 10 activities, 1 being the lowest level of functionality and 10 being the highest level of functionality. Most of the categories are easily self-evaluated, though some will require one-on-one discussion with the test administrator. At the completion of the Functional Assessment Questionnaire, a functionality score, ranging between 14 and 140 is tabulated for each individual.
In order to maintain scientific integrity of the Functional Assessment Questionnaire, certain non-identifiable information will be collected on each human subject. This information includes:
1. Age
2. Sex
3. Visual Acuity (BCVA)
4. Peripheral Field
5. Diagnosed Eye Condition
Comparative statistical analysis will be performed with the Functional Assessment Questionnaire results and the widely used SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey Instrument) and NEI-VFQ-25 with Appendix (National Eye Institute/Visual Function Questionnaire-25) questionnaires. The goal will be to check which questionnaire is more sensitive and accurate in measuring functional level outcomes both prior to (low-functioning individuals) and after (high functioning individuals) vision rehabilitation program participation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A, B
A: High functioning visually challenged (legally blind) B: Low-functioning visually challenged (legally blind)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Capacity to complete the informed consent process
* Legally blind (best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or greater, and/or vision field of 20 degrees or less).
* Long-term or short-term blindness with no or minimal vision rehabilitation. (These will be considered low-functioning subjects). or
* Legally blind with extensive vision rehabilitation, independent and self-sufficient. (These will be considered high-functioning subjects).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are not legally blind.
* Patients who have had some vision rehabilitation, thus falling in between a high-functioning and low-functioning category.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
George Washington University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
The George Washington University University Medical Faculty Associates
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig Geist, M.D., M.S.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
George Washington University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lingebach D, Olszowy R, Zollman R and Geist CE. Functional Assessment Questionaire for Low Vision. Abstract. Envision Conference, Kansas City, September 22-23, 2006 Poster Session.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GWUIRB#120526
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.