Enhancing Motor Task Training by Action Observation Watching Others Perform the Task
NCT ID: NCT00393432
Last Updated: 2017-07-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-10-18
2008-07-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Healthy normal volunteers between 18 and 55 years of age may be eligible for this study. Candidates are screened with a medical history, general and neurological exam, and a brain MRI if one has not been done within 12 months of entering the study. Participants undergo one or both of the following experiments:
1. Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Training and Action Observation
Subjects participate in at least 12 4-hour test sessions, separated by at least 1 day. Each session includes the following:
* Functional MRI (fMRI): MRI scanning uses a magnetic field and radio waves to produce images of the brain. For fMRI, the subject performs tasks during the scan to allow researchers to see brain changes that occur during performance of the activity.
* Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): For this test, a wire coil is held on the scalp. A brief electrical current passes through the coil to stimulate the brain. The stimulation may cause a twitch in muscles of the face, arm, or leg, and the subject may hear a click and feel a pulling sensation on the skin under the coil. During the stimulation, the subject is asked to: 1) perform the training task (make brisk thumb movements); 2) watch a video showing the hand of another person performing the same task; and 3) perform the task and watch the video at the same time, synchronizing his or her movements with those observed in the video.
* Surface electromyography: Electrodes are filled with a conductive gel and taped to the skin over a hand muscle to measure the electrical activity of the muscle.
* Behavioral measurements: Evaluation of learned movement tasks.
* Questionnaires to test attention, fatigue and mood before, during and after each test session.
2. Effect of Pharmacological Agents on Motor Training and Action Observation
Subjects participate in no more than 12 5-hour test sessions, separated by at least 2 days. In the course of the 12 sessions, subjects receive each of three medications - dextromethorphan, scopolamine and rivastigmine - three times and a placebo (pill with no active ingredient) three times. During each session, subjects have TMS measurements, behavioral measurements and electromyography as described in experiment 1.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Learning a Motor Task Through Observation
NCT00050869
Long-Term Improvement in Motor Learning by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
NCT00314769
Exercise Training to Improve Cognitive Function
NCT03824639
Efficacy, Transfer, and Neuro-functional Basis of a Memory Training Targeting Episodic Retrieval in Older Adults.
NCT06110234
Improve New Learning and Memory in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT05396248
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this protocol is to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying motor memory formation by MT+AO. We plan to perform two different types of experiments: In experiment 1, we will modulate activity in PMv using TMS to investigate the role of this cortical area on motor memory formation induced by MT+AO. In experiment 2, we will test the effects of single doses of (a) the NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan, (b) the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine, both known to disrupt LTP, and (c) the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine, which enhances LTP.
The primary outcome measure of motor memory formation will be the percentage of TMS-evoked movements that fall within the training target zone (TTZ) before and after MT+AO. The secondary outcome measure will be the percentage of TMS-evoked movements that fall within TTZ before and after MT alone and AO alone.
Expected results are (1) upregulation of activity in PMv using 0.1 Hz TMS will enhance motor memory formation induced by MT+AO more than sham TMS and downregulation of PMv using 0.9 Hz TMS and (2) dextromethorphan and scopolamine will decrease but rivastigmine will increase motor memory formation induced by MT+AO with placebo. This study may provide useful information on the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of action observation on neuroplasticity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to perform tasks required by the study
3. Willing and able to give consent
4. Possibility to obtain TMS-evoked thumb movements in a consistent direction at baseline
Exclusion Criteria
1. Are unable to perform the tasks
2. Have history of severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illness like severe depression and poor motivational capacity
3. Have problems with movement of the hands
4. Are receiving drugs acting primarily on the central nervous system
5. Are pregnant
6. Have medical or technical contraindications to MRI procedures or devices producing artifacts that impair MRI signal (e.g., dental braces, pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, cochlear devices, neural stimulators, metal in the cranium, surgical clips, and other metal/magnetic implants, claustrophobia)
7. Have had an allergic reaction to scopolamine. Have glaucoma, severe liver disease, kidney disease, an enlarged prostrate gland or a blocked digestive tube
8. Have had an allergic reaction to dextromethorphan
9. Are using a MAO inhibitor (such as Parnate \[registered trademark\], Nardil \[registered trademark\], or Marplan \[registered trademark\] or if you have used one of these drugs in the past 2 weeks
10. Have asthma
11. Are taking pain or arthritis medicine (sometimes called NSAIDs) such as aspirin, ibuprofen, or naproxen on a regular basis
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Apland JP, Braitman DJ. Effects of non-opioid antitussives on epileptiform activity and NMDA responses in hippocampal and olfactory cortex slices. Brain Res. 1990 Oct 8;529(1-2):277-85. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90838-3.
Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund HJ. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jan;13(2):400-4.
Butefisch CM, Khurana V, Kopylev L, Cohen LG. Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2004 May;91(5):2110-6. doi: 10.1152/jn.01038.2003. Epub 2004 Jan 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
07-N-0010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
070010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.