Decoding Motion Planning Using Cortical Potentials

NCT ID: NCT04325516

Last Updated: 2020-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The team will investigate the user's intention to move by using cortical activity during a sit to stand movement performance in people with a transfemoral amputation and able-bodied individuals. The goal is to get insights in pre-movement onset indicators within the brain that initiate the sit to stand transfer. The hypothesis is that people with a transfemoral amputation use different brain locations for motion planning compared to able-bodied individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The evolution of lower limb prostheses has made considerable progress in the past decades. There has been a transition from passive (e.g. Total knee®, Össur) to quasi-passive (e.g. C-leg®, Otto Bock) and eventually to active prostheses (e.g. Power knee®, Össur). The development always focused on an amputation as a primary peripheral disorder. For example, manufacturers have been searching to compensate the loss of muscle mass by adding torque into the prosthesis. However, few considerations have yet been taken to the fact that central adaptations are also observed after amputation in terms of neuroplasticity and reorganization.

The atypical motion planning strategies of people with a lower limb amputation (LLA) could possibly be related to the challenges that they experience during daily activities, such as the sit to stand transfer. Standing up from a chair is a relevant clinical problem and current devices do not yet relieve the asymmetrical loading. A few studies have already investigated the muscular activity during a sit to stand movement in people with a LLA and able-bodied individuals. The movement is characterized by a forward displacement of the centre of mass with the highest activation of the m. gluteus maximus, m. adductor magnus and m. biceps femoris.The sit to stand transfer is a potential movement to investigate brain activity incorporating the advantages and disadvantages of EEG measurements.

Until now, the development of lower limb prostheses approaches people with a LLA as a peripheral disorder whereas relevant central adaptations are also observed. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the cortical activity that is responsible for successfully completing a sit to stand transfer. The hypothesis is that different brain locations are activated in people with a transfemoral amputation for motion planning compared to able-bodied individuals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

People with a lower limb amputation

Participants will perform four tasks in a randomized order:

* sit to stand
* dorsi flexion of the foot
* knee extension
* hip extension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Daily activities

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will perform four tasks in a randomized order:

* sit to stand
* dorsi flexion of the foot
* knee extension
* hip extension

Able bodied individuals

Participants will perform four tasks in a randomized order:

* sit to stand
* dorsi flexion of the foot
* knee extension
* hip extension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Daily activities

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will perform four tasks in a randomized order:

* sit to stand
* dorsi flexion of the foot
* knee extension
* hip extension

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Daily activities

Participants will perform four tasks in a randomized order:

* sit to stand
* dorsi flexion of the foot
* knee extension
* hip extension

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 25 - 75 years
* Gender: men and women
* Level of amputation: unilateral transfemoral
* Vascular or traumatic cause of amputation
* Medicare Functional Classification Level25: K3-4
* Participants are able to stand up from a chair and return to the seated position without support of their hands for ten repetitions
* Participants wear their prosthesis for at least 8 hours/day (Prosthetic use has been shown to have an influence on functional reorganization)
* No cognitive impairment. This will be objectified with the mini-mental state examination (score on 30)

Exclusion Criteria

* Any neurological disease
* No upper limb or bilateral amputation
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jo Ghillebert

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jo Ghillebert, msc

Role: primary

0494902770

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EEGstudy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Neural Substrates for Working Memory Training
NCT03012269 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3