Effect of Passive Gait Training on the Cortical Activity in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

NCT ID: NCT00430703

Last Updated: 2008-11-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-08-31

Study Completion Date

2008-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to determine whether passive gait training increases arousal, demonstrated as changes in EEG (electroencephalogram) activity.

Hypotheses: 1) Passive gait training increases EEG-frequency in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe traumatic brain injury.

2\) Passive gait training increases conductivity speed of the cognitive P300-component of ERP in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe traumatic brain injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severe traumatic brain injury, especially after a high energy trauma, is characterised with focal lesions and diffuse axonal injury, which leads to the dysfunction in the cortico-spinal, cortico- cortical connections and reticular activation system. Formatio reticularis plays an important role in arousal. Tactile and proprioceptive stimulation with a view to improving level of consciousness in coma patients is popular in the western world despite insufficient evidence of its effectiveness. Affolter-Bobath-Coombes-concept is the most commonly used tool in the rehabilitation of brain damaged patients. This concept is based on the theory that tactile, proprioceptive and oral stimulation develops new connections in the brain and thereby stimulates consciousness and behaviour. Elliot et al shows improvement in level of consciousness due to postural changes from a lying position to a standing posture in 8 of 12 patients using Wessex Head Injury Matrix.

Passive movements result in proprioceptive stimulation; the effect of which is close to that achieved by physiological voluntary activity. PET and fMRI studies show that passive movements activate several areas in the motor cortex.

In order to increase afferent cortical input, passive gait training in the body weight support robotic gait orthosis could be used in patients with impaired consciousness, inability to cooperate and poor balance. This device gives the possibility to establish therapeutically correct upright body position and passive legs movement simultaneously.

To our knowledge there are no studies, which illustrate the effects of passive gait training on cortical activity in patients with impaired consciousness due to severe traumatic brain injury.

Our hypothesis is that passive gait training of this group of patients increases arousal, which can be shown in an increased EEG (electroencephalogram)-frequency and increased conductivity speed of the cognitive P300-component of ERP (Event Related Potentials).

Comparison(s): EEG- and ERP-activity after a single training session in robotic gait orthosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, compared to EEG- and ERP-activity after a single training session in robotic gait orthosis in healthy persons.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Craniocerebral Trauma Traumatic Brain Injury "Rehabilitation"

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

severe traumatic brain injury body weight support treadmill training Electroencephalogram Event Related Potentials

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

body weight support treadmill training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Gait training: Gait robot (Lokomat®, Hocoma, Switzerland) is adjusted to the patient/healthy volunteer individually with chest strap, pelvic straps, harness, leg cuffs and foot lifters. Weight is adjusted individually, so there is a minimum weight support (i.e. when one foot is standing on the treadmill the other foot lifts free from the treadmill thereby simulating normal gait). Gait speed is 1,7-2,3 km/hour (speed can be changed and adjusted that the normal step length is achieved).The duration of the training session is 20 minutes.Blood pressure and pulse are monitored.

2

Healthy volunteers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

body weight support treadmill training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Gait training: Gait robot (Lokomat®, Hocoma, Switzerland) is adjusted to the patient/healthy volunteer individually with chest strap, pelvic straps, harness, leg cuffs and foot lifters. Weight is adjusted individually, so there is a minimum weight support (i.e. when one foot is standing on the treadmill the other foot lifts free from the treadmill thereby simulating normal gait). Gait speed is 1,7-2,3 km/hour (speed can be changed and adjusted that the normal step length is achieved).The duration of the training session is 20 minutes.Blood pressure and pulse are monitored.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

body weight support treadmill training

Gait training: Gait robot (Lokomat®, Hocoma, Switzerland) is adjusted to the patient/healthy volunteer individually with chest strap, pelvic straps, harness, leg cuffs and foot lifters. Weight is adjusted individually, so there is a minimum weight support (i.e. when one foot is standing on the treadmill the other foot lifts free from the treadmill thereby simulating normal gait). Gait speed is 1,7-2,3 km/hour (speed can be changed and adjusted that the normal step length is achieved).The duration of the training session is 20 minutes.Blood pressure and pulse are monitored.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patient group :

1. severe brain injury (GCS-scale\< 8 on admission to the hospital);
2. Ongoing impaired state of consciousness (RLAS-scale≤4);
3. stable vital functions;
4. written consent from relatives/ legal guardian.

Control group:

1. no history of neurological diseases in the past;
2. age over 18 years;
3. written agreement.

Exclusion Criteria

Patient and control group:

1. age older than 80 years;
2. other neurological disease;
3. lack of BAEP and SEP;
4. severe co-morbidity;
5. pregnancy;
6. robotic orthosis contraindications (orthostatic circulatory problems, unstable fractures, severe osteoporosis, skin problems, joint problems, severe asymmetry (major difference in leg length over 2 cm), co-operation problems (reduced cooperation, psychotic illnesses or neurotic disturbances), body weight over 100 kg, adjustment problems (i.e. robot cannot be safely adjusted to the patient).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus County, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karsten Koch-Jensen, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre

Johannes Jakobsen, MD, DMSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Neurology, Aarhus University

Natallia Lapitskaya, MD, PhD-stud

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre

Hammel, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HNRC-AAU-06-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id