BEST (Burn Center Evaluation of Standard Therapies) Ventilator Mode Study-
NCT ID: NCT00351741
Last Updated: 2015-09-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-07-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: Patients placed on HFPV will have significantly higher number of ventilator-free days compared to patients placed on a conventional volume mode.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation Versus Flow-Controlled Ventilation in Burn Patients
NCT07041957
Comparison of Two Methods of High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Individuals With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT00399581
Impact of PEEP Trials on Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in ARDS Patients
NCT06823804
Adaptive Support Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT03715751
Effect of Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation on Improving Carbon Dioxide Clearance in AECOPD Patients
NCT05435183
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Frequency
Provide standard ventilatory support for burn patients utilizing high frequency percussive ventilation
Ventilation - High Frequency Percussive Ventilation
Ventilatory support delivering high frequency percussive ventilation using the Volumetric Diffusive Respirator
Conventional
Standard ventilator support for non burned patients utilizing lung protective low tidal volume ventilation
Ventilation - ARDSnet
Respiratory support with a conventional mode of ventilation using a conventional ventilator (Draeger Evita XL)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ventilation - High Frequency Percussive Ventilation
Ventilatory support delivering high frequency percussive ventilation using the Volumetric Diffusive Respirator
Ventilation - ARDSnet
Respiratory support with a conventional mode of ventilation using a conventional ventilator (Draeger Evita XL)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are pregnant Patients not expected to survive for more than 24 hours
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elsa Coates
Administrator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin K Chung, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
United States Army Insitute of Surgical Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Salim A, Martin M. High-frequency percussive ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar;33(3 Suppl):S241-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000155921.32083.ce.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
Chung KK, Wolf SE, Renz EM, Allan PF, Aden JK, Merrill GA, Shelhamer MC, King BT, White CE, Bell DG, Schwacha MG, Wanek SM, Wade CE, Holcomb JB, Blackbourne LH, Cancio LC. High-frequency percussive ventilation and low tidal volume ventilation in burns: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1970-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eb9d0b.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-06-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.