Comparison of Two Methods of High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Individuals With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT00399581
Last Updated: 2013-02-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2009-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation on Improving Carbon Dioxide Clearance in AECOPD Patients
NCT05435183
Incidence of Dyssynchronies in Early ARDS
NCT03447288
Exploration of Non-invasive High-frequency Oscillations in Human-machine Asynchrony in Healthy Subjects
NCT05448417
Study of a Novel Technique of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT00637507
The Effect of High Frequency Oscillation on Biological Markers of Lung Injury
NCT01581255
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
HFOV is a mechanical ventilation method that pumps small amounts of air into the lungs at a constant high rate. Because the increments of air are small the likelihood of experiencing overdistension and developing VALI may be reduced. While HFOV is an effective, commonly used ventilation method, there have been no studies that demonstrate the efficacy of HFOV in comparison to the efficacy of conventional mechanical ventilation methods. This study will compare two different HFOV techniques: the HFOV-Hi method, which uses higher airway pressure, and the HFOV-Lo method, which uses lower airway pressure. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of HFOV-Hi, HFOV-Lo, and standard mechanical ventilation methods in individuals with ARDS.
This study will enroll individuals with ARDS at four Baltimore hospitals. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either HFOV-Hi or HFOV-Lo. All participants will receive their assigned HFOV method for 7 days, until spontaneous breathing occurs, or until death, whichever occurs first. Blood collected at baseline and Days 1 and 3 will be analyzed for markers of inflammation and lung injury. Participants' clinical status will be monitored until they no longer need ventilation and return home, or for up to 60 days while in the hospital. Individuals being treated for ARDS at the participating hospitals who decline to enroll in the study will be asked for permission to monitor their medical progress. These individuals will not take part in any study procedures, but their clinical information will be used for comparison purposes. Additionally, clinical information on other ARDS patients admitted to the hospital over the previous 2 years will be analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HFOV-Lo
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using lower mean airway pressures and higher FiO2s.
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation-Lo
HFOV will be conducted without routine recruitment maneuvers and with a table of mPaw and FiO2s that include relatively low mPaw's.
HFOV-Hi
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using higher mean airway pressures
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation-Hi
HFOV will be conducted with recruitment maneuvers and with a table of mPaw and FiO2s that include higher mPaw's.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation-Hi
HFOV will be conducted with recruitment maneuvers and with a table of mPaw and FiO2s that include higher mPaw's.
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation-Lo
HFOV will be conducted without routine recruitment maneuvers and with a table of mPaw and FiO2s that include relatively low mPaw's.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Bilateral infiltrates consistent with edema on frontal chest radiograph, with a duration of no more than 7 days
2. Requires positive pressure ventilation through an endotracheal tube
3. PaO2/FiO2 less than 200 while receiving positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at more than 8 cm H2O for at least 4 hours, with a duration of no more than 7 days
4. No clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension
Exclusion Criteria
* Receives more than 5 days of mechanical ventilation during current hospitalization
* Attending physician declines to give consent for participant to enroll
* Patient or surrogate declines or is unable to give consent
* Participation in another interventional study for ARDS in the 30 days prior to study entry
* Intracranial hypertension
* Single lung transplant
* Burns over more than 30% of the surface area of the body
* Pregnant
* Sickle (Hgb SS) or sickle-thal (Hgb SC) hemoglobin
* Pre-existing illness with a life expectancy of 6 months or less
* Physicians and family are not committed to full support (Exception: An individual will not be excluded if he/she would receive all medical care except for attempts at resuscitation from cardiac arrest)
* Severe chronic lung disease
* Prior lung resection
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roy G. Brower, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Wilford Hall Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson LD. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
Krishnan JA, Brower RG. High-frequency ventilation for acute lung injury and ARDS. Chest. 2000 Sep;118(3):795-807. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.3.795.
Derdak S, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Smith T, Rogers M, Buchman TG, Carlin B, Lowson S, Granton J; Multicenter Oscillatory Ventilation For Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (MOAT) Study Investigators. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep 15;166(6):801-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2108052.
Randomized study of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. HiFO Study Group. J Pediatr. 1993 Apr;122(4):609-19. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83548-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
471
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.