Protective Ventilatory Strategy in Potential Organ Donors

NCT ID: NCT00260676

Last Updated: 2009-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-09-30

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to verify if a "PROTECTIVE" ventilatory strategy (low tidal volume and high PEEP, application of CPAP during the apnea test and recruitment maneuvers), improves lung function and increases the number of lungs eligible for transplantation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lung transplantation reduces mortality in patients with severe pulmonary diseases. While 50-70% of kidney, liver and heart are eligible for transplantation, only 20% of the lungs fit the criteria for transplant. More than 30% of the lungs theoretically suitable for donation are not actually collected because following brain death they develop severe hypoxemia and abnormal chest X-ray. Guidelines for critical care management of potential organ donors suggest that after the diagnosis of brain death, treatment priority can be shifted from cerebral protection to a strategy aimed at preserving solid organ perfusion and function. However the ventilatory strategy recommended for potential lung donors is similar to the one proposed for brain injured patients. This ventilatory strategy based on high Vt and low PEEP may induce a further exacerbation of the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Moreover, recent data suggest that this strategy may be harmful in "normal lungs" of mechanical ventilated patients. Aim of the study is to verify if a "PROTECTIVE" ventilatory strategy (low tidal volume and high PEEP, application of CPAP during the apnea test and recruitment maneuvers) improves lung function. Primary end point of the study is to increase the number of lungs that meet the eligibility criteria for transplantation. Secondary end point is to increase the number of lungs really transplanted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

conventional ventilation, protective ventilation

Group Type OTHER

change ventilation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

reduction of tidal volume, increase of PEEP, recruiting maneuver, apnea test during CPAP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

change ventilation

reduction of tidal volume, increase of PEEP, recruiting maneuver, apnea test during CPAP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 18-65 years
* Chest X-ray: no infiltrates
* Duration of mechanical ventilation from the admission to ICU to the clinical diagnosis of brain death \< 5 days
* No history of Smoking (1 pack/day for 20 years; 1/2 pack/day for 40 years; 2 packs/day for 10 years)
* No history of Asthma
* No history of COPD
* No history of Trauma
* No history of Thoracic surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of aspiration (chest X-ray or bronchoscopy) or sepsis
* Purulent secretions (tracheal suction or bronchoscopy)
* Sputum Gram stain with bacteria, fungus, significant number of WBC
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, Italy

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Turin, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Turin, Italy

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

luciana mascia, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Turin, Italy

marco ranieri, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Turin, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Turin, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine

Turin, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

luciana mascia, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

390116335600

daniela pasero, MD

Role: CONTACT

390116334002

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mascia L, Pasero D, Slutsky AS, Arguis MJ, Berardino M, Grasso S, Munari M, Boifava S, Cornara G, Della Corte F, Vivaldi N, Malacarne P, Del Gaudio P, Livigni S, Zavala E, Filippini C, Martin EL, Donadio PP, Mastromauro I, Ranieri VM. Effect of a lung protective strategy for organ donors on eligibility and availability of lungs for transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Dec 15;304(23):2620-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1796.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21156950 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

396

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Driving Pressure in Neurosurgery
NCT04421976 COMPLETED NA