Effects of Post Isometric Relaxation as Compared to Post Isometric Stretching Muscle Energy Technique in the Management of Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT07328256

Last Updated: 2026-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-15

Study Completion Date

2026-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare the effects of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) and post isometric stretching (PIS) techniques on reducing neck pain, improving range of motion, and decreasing neck disability in individuals with neck pain. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with 50 participants, who will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving PIR and the other receiving PIS. A single-blind method will be used, meaning the participants will not know which group they belong to. Participants will be selected based on specific criteria related to neck pain and will then be randomly allocated to the PIR or PIS group. Initially, all participants will receive two standard treatments: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and hot pack application. After these treatments, one group will undergo post-isometric relaxation (PIR), which involves 3-5 repetitions of muscle contraction and relaxation, conducted over five consecutive sessions. The other group will receive post-isometric stretching (PIS), which involves stretching after muscle contraction and relaxation, also administered over five consecutive sessions. At the end of the intervention, pain, range of motion, and neck disability will be measured. Pain will be assessed using a standardised pain scale, range of motion will be measured with a goniometer or other appropriate tools, and neck disability will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Statistical analysis will be performed to compare the effectiveness of PIR and PIS in terms of pain reduction, range of motion improvement, and decreased neck disability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neck pain is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal complaints among young adults, with studies reporting a prevalence of up to 75.7%, making it the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide. Research suggests that weak cervical musculature, reduced muscle-to-bodyweight ratios, and imbalances in muscle strength are key contributors to neck pain and associated disability. Muscle Energy Techniques (METs), particularly Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) and Post-Isometric Stretching (PIS), have been widely used to address these issues. PIR involves gentle isometric contractions followed by muscle relaxation and is effective for managing active muscle tone, making it suitable for acute conditions. However, it lacks a stretching component to target passive tone. PIS adds a post-contraction stretch, potentially addressing both active and passive tone, but may cause discomfort in sensitive individuals. While both techniques have shown positive outcomes in reducing pain and improving function, limited research directly compares their effectiveness. Therefore, this study aims to compare PIR and PIS in terms of pain relief, cervical range of motion, and functional improvement in individuals with mechanical neck pain.

According to M.Osama et al in 2020 a study was conducted to compared autogenic inhibition (AI) and reciprocal inhibition (RI) muscle energy techniques (MET) to static stretching (SS) for managing mechanical neck pain. Both AI-MET and RI-MET outperformed SS in enhancing isometric strength, with no adverse effects observed. The findings highlight AI-MET's superiority and support its use in neck pain rehabilitation.

Another study was conducted by Osama M 2024, 78 participants a randomized trial concluded that Muscle and Movement specific PIR is effective in improving neck pain, disability and ROM. Dudonienė V et al preformed a study in 2024 that aimed to investigate the 3 effectiveness of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) compared to self-stretching (SS) in working-age individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. Result showed PIR group achieved lower pain intensity, greater neck extension ROM and lower neck disability index compared to the SS group.

A study conducted in 2022 investigates the effects of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) versus myofascial release therapy on non-specific neck pain management. Results showed that the PIR group had significant improvements in pain (measured by VAS), disability (NDI), cervical extension, and social QoL compared to the MFR group.

Another study investigated the effectiveness of post isometric relaxation (PIR) combined with traditional physical therapy for treating chronic mechanical neck pain compared to traditional therapy alone. Results showed significant reductions in pain and increases in cervical range of motion (ROM) for group adding PIR to conventional therapy.

The study compares the effectiveness of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) and passive neck retraction mobilization (PNRM) in treating nonspecific neck pain. This study suggests that PIR to be a more effective treatment option for nonspecific neck discomfort.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Post Isometric Relaxation

Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) is used for treating muscle tightness or spasms. It involves a sequence of steps that aim to improve flexibility and reduce muscle tension.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Post Isometric Relaxation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients were given Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in combination with superficial heat for 10 minutes. with a session of 5 days/ week.

Group A (PIR) : In this group, participants performed 3-5 rounds of post-isometric relaxation (PIR). Each round involved contracting the target muscle at 30-50% strength for 7-10 seconds, resting for 5 seconds .

Post Isometric Stretching

Post-Isometric Stretching (PIS) is a technique used improve flexibility while working on passive tone of the muscle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Post Isometric Relaxation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients were given Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in combination with superficial heat for 10 minutes. with a session of 5 days/ week.

Group A (PIR) : In this group, participants performed 3-5 rounds of post-isometric relaxation (PIR). Each round involved contracting the target muscle at 30-50% strength for 7-10 seconds, resting for 5 seconds .

Post Isometric Stretching

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients were given Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in combination with superficial heat for 10 minutes. with a session of 5 days/ week.Group B (PIS) : In this group participants performed 3-5 rounds of post-isometric relaxation (PIR), which is then followed by a stretch of the same muscle to its new range of motion. Followed by rest of 5 seconds, and then stretching the muscle and holding the stretch for 10-60 seconds

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Post Isometric Relaxation

All patients were given Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in combination with superficial heat for 10 minutes. with a session of 5 days/ week.

Group A (PIR) : In this group, participants performed 3-5 rounds of post-isometric relaxation (PIR). Each round involved contracting the target muscle at 30-50% strength for 7-10 seconds, resting for 5 seconds .

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Post Isometric Stretching

All patients were given Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in combination with superficial heat for 10 minutes. with a session of 5 days/ week.Group B (PIS) : In this group participants performed 3-5 rounds of post-isometric relaxation (PIR), which is then followed by a stretch of the same muscle to its new range of motion. Followed by rest of 5 seconds, and then stretching the muscle and holding the stretch for 10-60 seconds

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Both gender
* With sub-acute or chronic neck pain for at least 4 to 12 weeks
* Pain intensity on NPRS ranging 4-8
* Limitation on neck movement

Exclusion Criteria

* • Positive history of fracture

* Surgery in the cervical region
* Any sort of physical trauma in the cervical region in the last 12 months
* Thoracic Outlet syndrome
* Cervical radiculopathy
* Cervical myelopathy
* Cervical spondylosis
* Cervical syringomyelia
* Any systemic disorder including malignancy or inflammatory and rheumatic disorders
* Infection
* Vascular syndromes such as vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI).
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

44 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation University Islamabad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

FUI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Foundation University Islamabad

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Areeka Riasat, DPT

Role: CONTACT

03219390688

Muhammad Furqan Hassan, MS-OMPT

Role: CONTACT

+923334056768

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Areeka Riasat, DPT

Role: primary

03219390688

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FUI/CTR/2025/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.