Comparison Between Soft Tissue Mobilization and Strengthening Exercises in Management of Local Neck Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT05227963
Last Updated: 2022-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-04
2021-08-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Progressive Cervical Isometric Exercises Versus Scapular Stabilization Exercises in Text Neck Syndrome
NCT05356676
Effects of Myofascial Release With Isometric Exercises Versus Scapular Stabilization Exercise on Neck Pain in Text Neck
NCT05202392
Comparison of Isometric and Isotonic Strengthening Exercises in Chronic Neck Pain Patients.
NCT05865951
Effectiveness of Neck Isometric Exercises and Cervical Mobilization on Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT05884567
Comparison of Cervical Retraction Exercise and Facet Oscillatory Mobilization in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT06707870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study describes the comparative effectiveness of STM when used as adjunct to strengthening exercises and when strengthening exercises are used alone for the management of TNS. According to the results of this study, STM in combination with neck isometric strengthening exercises as well as exercises alone were effective for managing neck pain and functional disability when a comparison was made within the groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group(Group A)
Experimental Group received soft tissue mobilization with neck isometric strengthening exercises.
soft tissue mobilization
In this group, each participants received 45-minutes long session that includes 25-minutes of soft tissue mobilization and 20-minutes of neck isometric strengthening exercises. In each session, patient was seated on chair and sustained pressure, direct oscillation, perpendicular mobilization, parallel mobilization, and friction massage was applied on the neck musculature for a minute followed by a release for 30 seconds. This protocol was repeated three times in each session. Each session was repeated four-times a week for two-weeks (a total eight sessions).
neck isometric strengthening exercises
In this group, each participant received 20-minutes long session. Each session started in seated position and participants were asked to perform flexion, extension, side bending and rotation against resistance. During flexion movement, therapist placed hand on forehead and asked patient to move the neck forward, while in extension, therapist hand was placed at back of the head and patient had to move neck in backward direction. However, in side bending and rotation- therapist hand was placed at lateral side of the head and asked patient to side bend the neck and look at shoulder in the same direction respectively. Each session was repeated four-times a week for two-weeks (a total eight sessions).
Control group (Group B)
Control group received neck isometric strengthening exercises alone.
neck isometric strengthening exercises
In this group, each participant received 20-minutes long session. Each session started in seated position and participants were asked to perform flexion, extension, side bending and rotation against resistance. During flexion movement, therapist placed hand on forehead and asked patient to move the neck forward, while in extension, therapist hand was placed at back of the head and patient had to move neck in backward direction. However, in side bending and rotation- therapist hand was placed at lateral side of the head and asked patient to side bend the neck and look at shoulder in the same direction respectively. Each session was repeated four-times a week for two-weeks (a total eight sessions).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
soft tissue mobilization
In this group, each participants received 45-minutes long session that includes 25-minutes of soft tissue mobilization and 20-minutes of neck isometric strengthening exercises. In each session, patient was seated on chair and sustained pressure, direct oscillation, perpendicular mobilization, parallel mobilization, and friction massage was applied on the neck musculature for a minute followed by a release for 30 seconds. This protocol was repeated three times in each session. Each session was repeated four-times a week for two-weeks (a total eight sessions).
neck isometric strengthening exercises
In this group, each participant received 20-minutes long session. Each session started in seated position and participants were asked to perform flexion, extension, side bending and rotation against resistance. During flexion movement, therapist placed hand on forehead and asked patient to move the neck forward, while in extension, therapist hand was placed at back of the head and patient had to move neck in backward direction. However, in side bending and rotation- therapist hand was placed at lateral side of the head and asked patient to side bend the neck and look at shoulder in the same direction respectively. Each session was repeated four-times a week for two-weeks (a total eight sessions).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients having local neck pain included
* Female included
* With chronic neck syndrome (\> month)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients having radiating pain excluded
* Male excluded.
* With acute neck syndrome (\< 3 month)
30 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Health Education Research Foundation (HERF)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Javairia Javaid
Senior Physiotherapist
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ref.No.Research/21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.