Comparison of Cervical Retraction Exercise and Facet Oscillatory Mobilization in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT06707870
Last Updated: 2024-11-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-01
2024-12-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To compare the effects of Cervical Retraction Exercise and Facet Oscillatory Mobilization in chronic Mechanical Neck pain at improving Neck Disability.
To compare the effects of Cervical Retraction Exercise and Facet Oscillatory Mobilization in chronic Mechanical Neck pain at Improving Range of Motion The study design used for this literature would be Randomized Control Trial This study would include total 32 participants which would be divided into two groups, 16 each.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervical retraction exercise
Cervical retraction exercise
Cervical retraction exercise
Neck retraction exercises are performed on patients either in sitting or standing in an upright position while pushing their chin backward and simultaneously raising their head within the pain-free range (3 seconds hold)of 10 repetitions in each session at sitting position. Conventional treatment (TENS (2 to 10 Hz),10 mints, Heating pad, stretching of tight muscles Trapezius and SCM)should be included.
The patients will received 20-30-minute sessions on 3 alternate days for two consecutive weeks, making it a total of 6 sessions. Patients were advised to revisit after 4 weeks (1 month from the baseline) for follow-up.
Facet oscillatory mobilization
Facet oscillatory mobilization
Facet oscillatory mobilization
Facet joint oscillatory mobilization on the cervical spine C2-C7(6 to 10 repetitions in each session) in the sitting position.
Conventional treatment (TENS (2 to 10 Hz) 10 mints, Heating pad, stretching of tight muscles Trapezius and SCM) should be included.
The patients will received 20-30-minute sessions on 3 alternate days for two consecutive weeks, making it a total of 6 sessions. Patients were advised to revisit after 4 weeks (1 month from the baseline) for follow-up.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cervical retraction exercise
Neck retraction exercises are performed on patients either in sitting or standing in an upright position while pushing their chin backward and simultaneously raising their head within the pain-free range (3 seconds hold)of 10 repetitions in each session at sitting position. Conventional treatment (TENS (2 to 10 Hz),10 mints, Heating pad, stretching of tight muscles Trapezius and SCM)should be included.
The patients will received 20-30-minute sessions on 3 alternate days for two consecutive weeks, making it a total of 6 sessions. Patients were advised to revisit after 4 weeks (1 month from the baseline) for follow-up.
Facet oscillatory mobilization
Facet joint oscillatory mobilization on the cervical spine C2-C7(6 to 10 repetitions in each session) in the sitting position.
Conventional treatment (TENS (2 to 10 Hz) 10 mints, Heating pad, stretching of tight muscles Trapezius and SCM) should be included.
The patients will received 20-30-minute sessions on 3 alternate days for two consecutive weeks, making it a total of 6 sessions. Patients were advised to revisit after 4 weeks (1 month from the baseline) for follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants were patients with a complaint of Chronic Mechanical neck pain (\> 6 weeks).
* Neck Disability Index (NDI) score \> 16%
* Age between 35-50 years, Both Male and Female
* NPRS score \>3-6.
* Recurrent neck pain aggravated at least once in the month.
* Painful Cervical ROM (Flexion \<80 Extension\<70 rotation\<90 to both sides and lateral flexion \<35 degree.
* Spurling test negative
* Patients willing to participates in the study after filling the consent form.
* Upper Limb Nerve tension test (Median, Radial, and Ulnar negative).
Exclusion Criteria
* Cervical radiculopathy
* Cervical canal stenosis
* Severe neurological disorder
* Previous cervical surgery
* Recent history of fall/trauma to the cervical spine.
35 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Faheem Ullah Jan, MS-OMPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Khyber Teaching hospital
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alansari SM, Youssef EF, Shanb AA. Efficacy of manual therapy on psychological status and pain in patients with neck pain. A randomized clinical trial. Saudi Med J. 2021 Jan;42(1):82-90. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.1.25589.
Phadke A, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2016 Apr 14;35:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Riphah/RCRAHS/REC/MS-PT/01931
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id