Active Release Versus Strain-Counter-strain Technique in Patients With Non-Specific Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT07026006
Last Updated: 2025-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-01
2025-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will be equally divided into 2 groups using a random number generator table. Group A will receive Active Release Technique, while Group B will receive Strain-Counterstrain. Both groups will also receive hot packs, superficial neck muscles stretching, and neck isometrics. Outcome measures, including the Numerical Pain Rating Scale for pain, goniometer for range of motion, cranio-vertebral angle measurement, Neck Disability Index, will be assessed at baseline and after four weeks. Ethical approval will be obtained from the Ethical Committee of Riphah International University, and informed consent will be secured from all participants. The outcomes will focus on pain intensity, cervical range of motion, cranio-vertebral angle, and disability, Data analysis will be performed using SPSS version 25. The findings are expected to provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of these manual therapy techniques, informing clinical practice and improving patient outcomes in the management of non-specific neck pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition, Muscle Energy and Strain Counter Strain Techniques in Neck Pain
NCT05262062
Effects of Scapular Stabilization Program in Patients Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
NCT05392023
Effects of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition Techniques With Conventional Therapy in Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT05044078
Effects of Neural Tension Versus Neural Sliding Technique on Cervical Radiculopathy.
NCT05959330
Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Trigger Points Release on Upper Trapezius Trigger Points
NCT05249660
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Neck pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder affecting a significant portion of the global population at some point in their lives. It is estimated that up to 70% of people will experience neck pain during their lifetime. According to the global burden of disease in the Mediterranean region, the point prevalence of neck pain was estimated as 34.31 per 1000 in Pakistan.
Neck pain is often classified into specific and non-specific categories. Non-specific neck pain lacks a definitive cause and is frequently associated with poor posture, muscle strain, or minor injuries. It can become chronic, leading to prolonged discomfort and disability. Chronic neck pain affects daily activities, work performance, and overall well-being, making effective management essential.
In Pakistan, the prevalence of non-specific neck pain mirrors global trends, affecting a considerable portion of the population. Studies indicate that around 34% of the population in Pakistan experiences non-specific neck pain, driven by factors such as sedentary lifestyles, poor posture, and ergonomic issues in workplaces.
The rationale for this study is grounded in the high prevalence and significant impact of neck pain on individuals' quality of life and overall well-being. Non-specific neck pain affects a considerable portion of the population, leading to chronic pain and disability. Current treatments, while effective, often vary in their outcomes, necessitating a comparison of different therapeutic techniques. This study focuses on comparing the effects of Active Release Technique and Strain-Counterstrain, two promising manual therapy approaches. To figure out their efficacy in reducing pain, improving range of motion, and enhancing postural alignment. By investigating these methods, this study seeks to provide novel insights into their comparative effectiveness, which has been underexplored.
The findings will inform clinical practice, potentially leading to more personalized and effective treatment plans. Additionally, the study aims to address the socioeconomic burden of neck pain by improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. Through rigorous methodology and comprehensive analysis, this research aspires to contribute significantly to the field of manual physical therapy and enhance the management of non-specific neck pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Group A
Active Release Technique
Active Release Technique
Patients will receive Active Release Technique (ART) protocol will be applied to 4 muscles Including; trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid (SCM), and suboccipital muscles (for 15 minutes)
Treatment Group B
Strain-counterstrain
Strain-counterstrain
Patients will receive Strain-counterstrain (SCS) protocol will be applied to 4 muscles Including the trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid (SCM), and suboccipital muscles for 15 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active Release Technique
Patients will receive Active Release Technique (ART) protocol will be applied to 4 muscles Including; trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid (SCM), and suboccipital muscles (for 15 minutes)
Strain-counterstrain
Patients will receive Strain-counterstrain (SCS) protocol will be applied to 4 muscles Including the trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid (SCM), and suboccipital muscles for 15 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both male and female
* Patients with neck pain for at least 2 months
* Palpable taut bands in upper trapezius, SCM
* ATrPs in upper trapezius, levator scapulae, SCM
* NPRS score is \>3/10 on NPRS for neck region
* Individuals with a Craniovertebral angle less than 53
* Individuals having grade 2 severity of neck pain according to KNGF Guidelines
* Localized pain/stiffness in cervical spine (C3-C7) without upper limb radiculopathy
* Diagnostic Tests: Negative Spurling's test, upper limb tension test, and shoulder abduction test
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
* Congenital problems
* Trigger point injections
* Individuals with KNGF Clinical Practice Guideline Grade III and IV severity of neck pain
* Respiratory disease and joint disease
* Neurological deficit
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Campos TF, Maher CG, Steffens D, Fuller JT, Hancock MJ. Exercise programs may be effective in preventing a new episode of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Physiother. 2018 Jul;64(3):159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Cabrera-Martos I, Rodriguez-Torres J, Lopez-Lopez L, Prados-Roman E, Granados-Santiago M, Valenza MC. Effects of an active intervention based on myofascial release and neurodynamics in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Sep;38(9):1145-1152. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1821418. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Junad- REC/RCR&AHS 24/0141
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.