Comparison of Chest Tube Wound Closure: Comparison Between Purse String Method and Plug Method.

NCT ID: NCT07319572

Last Updated: 2026-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

246 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective, comparative clinical study evaluates two techniques of chest tube wound closure-purse-string suture and the simple suture/plug method-to determine differences in cosmetic outcomes, wound complications, and overall patient satisfaction following chest tube removal. The study aims to identify the closure technique that provides optimal wound healing with fewer postoperative complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chest tube removal often results in small but cosmetically significant wounds. The traditional purse-string suture technique is widely used due to its presumed ability to ensure air-tight closure; however, it is frequently associated with circular or puckered scars that affect cosmetic appearance. Recently, the simple suture/plug method has been proposed as a more cosmetic alternative while maintaining adequate wound integrity.

This study prospectively enrolls patients requiring chest tube removal and allocates them to one of the two wound closure techniques. Standardized postoperative care is provided to all participants. The primary outcome is cosmetic appearance of the scar, evaluated using a validated scar assessment scale at follow-up. Secondary outcomes include wound infection, seroma or discharge, persistent air leak, wound dehiscence, time to healing, and patient satisfaction.

The findings are expected to help clinicians select the most effective and cosmetically favorable method for chest tube wound closure in routine surgical practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumothorax Hemothorax Chest Tube Chest Tube Removal Purse String Plug Method

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Purse string group

Patients in this arm will have the chest tube removal site closed using a purse-string suture technique. After chest tube removal and haemostasis, a single circumferential (purse-string) stitch is placed around the wound margin and tightened to approximate the skin edges. Skin is left approximated; additional superficial interrupted skin sutures may be applied at the investigator's discretion. Suture material: monofilament nylon or silk, per local practice. Standard sterile dressing applied. Post-procedure wound care and follow-up are identical to the comparator arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Purse string suture closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PURSE STRING METHOD OF CLOSURE: A circumferential suture is placed around the chest tube insertion site before or after tube removal. The suture is tightened like a drawstring to approximate the skin edges and close the wound. This method provides an air-tight seal but often results in a puckered, circular scar.

PLUG METHOD OF CLOSURE: After chest tube removal, the tract is allowed to collapse naturally and is gently plugged with a small gauze piece impregnated with petroleum jelly.

Plug Method group

After chest tube removal, the wound is swiftly plugged off with an impregnable gauze and no sutures applied. The gauze is then fixed with air tight dressing

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plug method closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

An impregnable gauze which is made airtight by coating it in petroleum jelly is swiftly placed over the chest wound site as the chest tube is removed and an air tight dressing done.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Purse string suture closure

PURSE STRING METHOD OF CLOSURE: A circumferential suture is placed around the chest tube insertion site before or after tube removal. The suture is tightened like a drawstring to approximate the skin edges and close the wound. This method provides an air-tight seal but often results in a puckered, circular scar.

PLUG METHOD OF CLOSURE: After chest tube removal, the tract is allowed to collapse naturally and is gently plugged with a small gauze piece impregnated with petroleum jelly.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Plug method closure

An impregnable gauze which is made airtight by coating it in petroleum jelly is swiftly placed over the chest wound site as the chest tube is removed and an air tight dressing done.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All patients \>18 years of age
2. Patients undergoing chest tube insertion for traumatic causes including Pneumothorax, hemothorax and hemopneumothorax.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous ipsilateral thoracic surgery
2. Patients with large wounds necessitating suture closure
3. Patients with bleeding disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Muhammad Fahad Ali

Principal Investigator (General Surgery Resident)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pakistan Institute of medical sciences

Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Muhammad Fahad Ali Ali, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+923320601136

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F-5-2/2024(ERCC)/PIMS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Small Bites Vs Large Bites Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure
NCT07154277 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3