Comparing Delayed vs Primary Wound Closure After Emergency Laparotomy: Impact on Infection, Healing, and Hospital Stay

NCT ID: NCT07142395

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-16

Study Completion Date

2025-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to find out which type of wound closure after emergency abdominal surgery leads to fewer wound infections and better recovery: closing the wound immediately after surgery (called primary closure) or waiting a few days before closing the skin (called delayed primary closure).

Wound infection is a common problem after emergency abdominal surgery (also called laparotomy). Some surgeons close the skin right away, while others wait a few days to reduce the risk of infection.

This study will help find out which method is better.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

1. . Does delayed primary closure lower the rate of wound infection compared to primary closure?
2. . Does the wound open up (wound dehiscence) less often with delayed closure?
3. . Does delayed closure affect the length of hospital stay?

In this clinical trial:

* Adult patients needing emergency abdominal surgery will be included.
* Half the patients will have their wounds closed immediately (primary closure), and half will have delayed closure after 3-5 days of daily dressing.
* All surgeries will be done by experienced surgeons using the same technique.
* Patients will be followed for 4 weeks after surgery to monitor wound infection, wound opening, and length of hospital stay.

The results will help doctors choose the safest and most effective way to close surgical wounds after emergency abdominal surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparotomy Closure After Abdominal Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Primary Closure

Skin closed immediately after laparotomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Immediate skin closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After laparotomy wounds will be closed primarily using no. 1 vicryl suture

Delayed Primary Closure

Skin closed 3 - 5 days after laparotomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Delayed primary closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Deeper layers of wound will be closed after surgery and loose mattress sutures will be applied to skin with prolene. After three to five days of daily dressing with bactericidal solution, the skin will be closed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Immediate skin closure

After laparotomy wounds will be closed primarily using no. 1 vicryl suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Delayed primary closure

Deeper layers of wound will be closed after surgery and loose mattress sutures will be applied to skin with prolene. After three to five days of daily dressing with bactericidal solution, the skin will be closed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients 18 - 60 years of age
* Either male or female gender and
* Planned to undergo emergency laparotomy

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing second laparotomy
* Re- laparotomy
* On steroid therapy and
* Patients who die within 28-days of surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bkahtawar Amin Medical and Dental College Multan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amjad A Professor, FRCS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College

Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1326-2839

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Small Bites Vs Large Bites Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure
NCT07154277 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3