Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Short Versus Long Stitch for Laparotomy Closure
NCT ID: NCT03828409
Last Updated: 2019-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-31
2018-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Techniques of abdominal wall closure has been constantly in order to develop an ideal suture technique to minimise wound complications. One of the most significant changes in abdominal closure technique was the introduction of mass closure technique, known as 'long stitch' (LS). This conventional mass closure, uses a suture-to-wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1, achieved by the use of continuous sutures at one centimetre from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of one centimetre. Studies have shown LS caused compression of tissues enclosed in the mass stitch, leading to tissue ischaemia and necrosis. 'Short stitch' (SS) was introduced in 1980s where it was reported to result in lower rate of incisional hernia and surgical site infection. It has a SL:WL of more than four, achieved by placing the suture five millimetres from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of five millimetre as well. It incorporates only the linea alba, which may reduce tension and post-operative pain.Studies has indicate that approximately 40% of post-operative patients reported inadequate pain relief despite therapeutic intervention. Inadequate pain control is associated with complications such as atelectasis, prolonged immobilization and hospital stay, thromboembolic event, cardiac morbidity, insomnia, ileus and poor wound healing The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain is commonly used as measures of pain score or intensity in clinical trials. A more objective way to evaluate the post-operative pain is to assess the usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over a period of time. The commonly used PCA drug for post-operative patient is morphine. As SS relies on less tension and proper distribution of force along the fascial plane, it is possible that it might reduce post-operative pain as compared to LS technique. It can be assessed using total usage of analgesia (intravenous infusion or PCA), with correlation to the respective visual-analogue scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) at that particular time. There is no study that evaluate post-operative pain difference between SS and LS technique.
The hypothesis of this study is that SS will reduce PCA morphine usage after midline laparotomy, which translate into reduction in post-operative pain. In order to detect the 30% reduction of PCA morphine, 86 patients are required.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing on Wound Dehiscence and Infection After Abdominal Surgery
NCT07241507
Short Stitch Versus Traditional Suture for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Open Hepatectomy
NCT04982653
Small Bite Technique Versus Standardised Large Bites Technique in Closure of Midline Laparotomies.
NCT04788875
Mass Continous Suture With PDS Versus Interrupted Suture With Thread on Major Abdominal Incision
NCT03801421
Comparing Delayed vs Primary Wound Closure After Emergency Laparotomy: Impact on Infection, Healing, and Hospital Stay
NCT07142395
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Techniques of abdominal wall closure has been constantly revised in order to develop an ideal suture technique to minimise wound complications. One of the most significant changes in abdominal closure technique was the introduction of mass closure technique, known as 'long stitch' (LS). This conventional mass closure, uses a suture-to-wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1, achieved by the use of continuous sutures at one centimetre from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of one centimetre. Studies have shown LS caused compression of tissues enclosed in the mass stitch, leading to tissue ischaemia and necrosis. 'Short stitch' (SS) was introduced in 1980s where it was reported to result in lower rate of incisional hernia and surgical site infection. It has a SL:WL of more than four, achieved by placing the suture five millimetres from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of five millimetre as well. It incorporates only the linea alba, which may reduce tension and post-operative pain.
Effective post-operative pain management is an important aspect in surgical patient care. Studies has indicate that approximately 40% of post-operative patients reported inadequate pain relief despite therapeutic intervention. Inadequate pain control is associated with complications such as atelectasis, prolonged immobilization and hospital stay, thromboembolic event, cardiac morbidity, insomnia, ileus and poor wound healing. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain is commonly used as measures of pain score or intensity in clinical trials. A more objective way to evaluate the post-operative pain is to assess the usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over a period of time. The commonly used PCA drug for post-operative patient is morphine. As SS relies on less tension and proper distribution of force along the fascial plane, it is possible that it might reduce post-operative pain as compared to LS technique. It can be assessed using total usage of analgesia (intravenous infusion or PCA), with correlation to the respective visual-analogue scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) at that particular time. There is no study that evaluate post-operative pain difference between SS and LS technique.
This is a prospective, multi-centered, double-blind randomized controlled trial to look into comparison of post-operative pain after elective laparotomy: short versus long stitch technique of closure in two tertiary hospitals. The study started in January 2017 and completed in November 2018. Patient who fulfilled the criteria of recruitment were included into this study.
In order to detect difference of 30% of PCA morphine usage, 86 patients are required. Both group of patients will received equal pre-operative analgesia, antibiotics and induction again. Patients will be randomized into LS and SS group. Once the aim of the surgery is achieved, the operating surgeon will open the sealed enveloped, which contain the group and technique of suture used. Postoperatively patient will be receiving oral paracetamol and taught on PCA morphine usage. PCA morphine usage and VAS score will be assessed by medical officer that are blinded to the treatment. Primary outcome is PCA morphine usage 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcome are presence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. Patients will subsequently be discharged by the surgeon in charge based on the discharge criteria. Patients will be follow-up in outpatient clinic on same interval. Presence of adverse events or complications will be documented.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
This study is carried out to evaluate if SS technique will reduce post-operative pain.
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Short stitch
short stitch used as one arm
Short stitch
The rectus sheath are cleaned off the subcutaneous fats. Short stitch technique uses smaller needle and suture material. The suture is placed nearer to each other as compared to our conventional long stitch technique. It has inter-suture distance of 5mm and 5mm distance from rectus edge. The suture will be started at one end and sutured continuous until the other end. Hence, this technique is applied without tension.
Long stitch
Long stitch uses a larger needle and suture material. The suture is placed 1cm from the linea alba and 1 cm from previous suture. This technique include mass closure sutures at the midline laparotomy
Long stitch
Long stitch as conventional mass-closure technique
Short stitch
The rectus sheath are cleaned off the subcutaneous fats. Short stitch technique uses smaller needle and suture material. The suture is placed nearer to each other as compared to our conventional long stitch technique. It has inter-suture distance of 5mm and 5mm distance from rectus edge. The suture will be started at one end and sutured continuous until the other end. Hence, this technique is applied without tension.
Long stitch
Long stitch uses a larger needle and suture material. The suture is placed 1cm from the linea alba and 1 cm from previous suture. This technique include mass closure sutures at the midline laparotomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Short stitch
The rectus sheath are cleaned off the subcutaneous fats. Short stitch technique uses smaller needle and suture material. The suture is placed nearer to each other as compared to our conventional long stitch technique. It has inter-suture distance of 5mm and 5mm distance from rectus edge. The suture will be started at one end and sutured continuous until the other end. Hence, this technique is applied without tension.
Long stitch
Long stitch uses a larger needle and suture material. The suture is placed 1cm from the linea alba and 1 cm from previous suture. This technique include mass closure sutures at the midline laparotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA Class I to III
* hemodynamically stable
* able to provide consent for surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* history of previous midline laparotomy
* allergic to opiates
* unable to use PCA morphine (handicapped)
* patient will be planned for stoma creation
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Malaya
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NMRR-16-1892-32723
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.