EFFICACY OF TRANSMUCOSAL MINIPLEITE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTRA-ARCH WIRE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR FIXATION OF SAGITTAL & PARA-SAGITTAL TYPES OF PALATAL FRACTURES IN TERMS OF INTRA-ARCH MOLAR DISTANCE & MAXILLO-MANDIBULAR MOLAR RELATION

NCT ID: NCT07274319

Last Updated: 2025-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-09-01

Study Completion Date

2027-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to reduce uncertainity around decision making regarding use of transmucosal miniplate stabilization technique in place of intra-arch wire stabilization technique to get better outcomes. It will help establish future guidelines for sagittal and para-sagittal types of palatal fracture treatment Under general anasthesia wires will be passed between molars of both sides for palatal fracture reduction or fracture will be reduced by applying plate at fracture site

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who present to a tertiary care oral and maxillofacial surgery department with sagittal or parasagittal palatal fractures will have their data prospectively gathered. Participants will be randomized to either the intra-arch wire stabilization group or the transmucosal miniplate stabilization group after providing their informed consent and undergoing eligibility screening.

Details of the Surgical Procedure

1. Preoperative Assessment:

A thorough clinical examination that includes a palatal integrity assessment and an occlusal evaluation.

To verify the kind (sagittal or para-sagittal) and extent of a palatal fracture, radiological imaging (CT or 3D CBCT scans) will be used along with imprints of the mandible and maxilla for model analysis and preoperative anesthetic evaluation and preventative antibiotics.
2. Technique for Intra-Arch Wire Stabilization:

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation combined with general anesthesia.

Access via Surgery:

The fracture line is identified.

Positioning the Wire:

Around the necks of the rear palatal teeth, stainless steel wires (often 26 or 28 gauge) are passed, commonly from molar to molar or second premolar to second premolar.

To stabilize the segments and guarantee appropriate fracture reduction, the wires are crossed over the palate (transpalatal wiring).

Alignment of Occlusal Space:

To guarantee that the molar connection is preserved during tightening, temporary intermaxillary fixation (IMF) or occlusal guiding are employed.

Occlusion is rechecked for correctness after stabilization.

Care Following Surgery:

oral hygiene guidelines, analgesics, and antibiotics. One to two weeks of a liquid-to-soft diet. Wires are removed in an outpatient setting and may stay in place for four to six weeks.
3. Technique for Transmucosal Miniplate Stabilization:

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.

Adapting Plates:

To fit the palatal curvature, a 1.5 or 2.0 mm titanium miniplate is molded.The plate is adapted over the fracture site and placed over the palate tissue.

Fixing the Plate:

The miniplate is attached to the palatal bone on each side of the fracture using miniscrews (4-6 mm).

Intraoperative check-bite or temporary intermaxillary fixation are used to guide occlusion.

Healing of Wounds:

Because there is little disturbance, mucosal healing happens quickly.

Care Following Surgery:

standard regimen of analgesics and antibiotics. Rinses with chlorhexidine and soft diet. Unless exposed or symptomatic, the miniplate is often kept in place; a second surgery is not necessary unless it is necessary.

Monitoring of Follow-Up and Outcomes:

* Frequent follow-up appointments at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks.
* intra-arch molar distance measurement with model analysis or digital calipers.
* Using bite analysis or occlusal markers, the molar connection is evaluated.
* Using follow-up radiographs and clinical stability, fracture healing is evaluated.

Demographic information, trauma history, fracture classification (as verified by CT imaging), and the baseline intra-arch molar distance measured with digital calipers will all be included in the preoperative data. Standard occlusion classification will be used to clinically document baseline maxillo-mandibular molar relationships. Trained maxillofacial surgeons will carry out the designated surgical procedure according to a defined methodology.

Assessments for postoperative follow-up will be carried out at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Clinical assessments of occlusal stability, intra-arch molar distance measurements, postoperative complications, and the need for occlusal correction will all be recorded at each visit. To guarantee data quality, data will be entered using structured forms and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sagittal and Parasagittal Palatal Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intra arch wire stabilization

. Technique for Intra-Arch Wire Stabilization:

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation combined with general anesthesia.

Access via Surgery:

The fracture line is identified.

Positioning the Wire:

Around the necks of the rear palatal teeth, stainless steel wires (often 26 or 28 gauge) are passed, commonly from molar to molar or second premolar to second premolar.

To stabilize the segments and guarantee appropriate fracture reduction, the wires are crossed over the palate (transpalatal wiring).

Alignment of Occlusal Space:

To guarantee that the molar connection is preserved during tightening, temporary intermaxillary fixation (IMF) or occlusal guiding are employed.

Occlusion is rechecked for correctness after stabilization.

Care Following Surgery:

oral hygiene guidelines, analgesics, and antibiotics. One to two weeks of a liquid-to-soft diet. Wires are removed in an outpatient setting and may stay in place for four to six weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intra arch wire stabilization technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation combined with general anesthesia.

Access via Surgery:

The fracture line is identified.

Positioning the Wire:

Around the necks of the rear palatal teeth, stainless steel wires (often 26 or 28 gauge) are passed, commonly from molar to molar or second premolar to second premolar.

To stabilize the segments and guarantee appropriate fracture reduction, the wires are crossed over the palate (transpalatal wiring).

Alignment of Occlusal Space:

To guarantee that the molar connection is preserved during tightening, temporary intermaxillary fixation (IMF) or occlusal guiding are employed.

Occlusion is rechecked for correctness after stabilization.

Care Following Surgery:

oral hygiene guidelines, analgesics, and antibiotics. One to two weeks of a liquid-to-soft diet. Wires are removed in an outpatient setting and may stay in place for four to six weeks.

Transmucosal Miniplate Stabilization

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.

Adapting Plates:

To fit the palatal curvature, a 1.5 or 2.0 mm titanium miniplate is molded.The plate is adapted over the fracture site and placed over the palate tissue.

Fixing the Plate:

The miniplate is attached to the palatal bone on each side of the fracture using miniscrews (4-6 mm).

Intraoperative check-bite or temporary intermaxillary fixation are used to guide occlusion.

Healing of Wounds:

Because there is little disturbance, mucosal healing happens quickly.

Care Following Surgery:

standard regimen of analgesics and antibiotics. Rinses with chlorhexidine and soft diet. Unless exposed or symptomatic, the miniplate is often kept in place; a second surgery is not necessary unless it is necessary.

Monitoring of Follow-Up and Outcomes:

* Frequent follow-up appointments at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks.
* intra-arch molar distance measurement with model analysis or digital calipers.
* Using bite analysis or occlusal markers,

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transmucosal Miniplate Stabilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.

Adapting Plates:

To fit the palatal curvature, a 1.5 or 2.0 mm titanium miniplate is molded.The plate is adapted over the fracture site and placed over the palate tissue.

Fixing the Plate:

The miniplate is attached to the palatal bone on each side of the fracture using miniscrews (4-6 mm).

Intraoperative check-bite or temporary intermaxillary fixation are used to guide occlusion.

Healing of Wounds:

Because there is little disturbance, mucosal healing happens quickly.

Care Following Surgery:

standard regimen of analgesics and antibiotics. Rinses with chlorhexidine and soft diet. Unless exposed or symptomatic, the miniplate is often kept in place; a second surgery is not necessary unless it is necessary.

Monitoring of Follow-Up and Outcomes:

* Frequent follow-up appointments at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks.
* intra-arch molar distance measurement with model analysis or digital calipers.
* Using bite analysis or occlusal markers,

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intra arch wire stabilization technique

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation combined with general anesthesia.

Access via Surgery:

The fracture line is identified.

Positioning the Wire:

Around the necks of the rear palatal teeth, stainless steel wires (often 26 or 28 gauge) are passed, commonly from molar to molar or second premolar to second premolar.

To stabilize the segments and guarantee appropriate fracture reduction, the wires are crossed over the palate (transpalatal wiring).

Alignment of Occlusal Space:

To guarantee that the molar connection is preserved during tightening, temporary intermaxillary fixation (IMF) or occlusal guiding are employed.

Occlusion is rechecked for correctness after stabilization.

Care Following Surgery:

oral hygiene guidelines, analgesics, and antibiotics. One to two weeks of a liquid-to-soft diet. Wires are removed in an outpatient setting and may stay in place for four to six weeks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transmucosal Miniplate Stabilization

Anesthesia:

Nasoendotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.

Adapting Plates:

To fit the palatal curvature, a 1.5 or 2.0 mm titanium miniplate is molded.The plate is adapted over the fracture site and placed over the palate tissue.

Fixing the Plate:

The miniplate is attached to the palatal bone on each side of the fracture using miniscrews (4-6 mm).

Intraoperative check-bite or temporary intermaxillary fixation are used to guide occlusion.

Healing of Wounds:

Because there is little disturbance, mucosal healing happens quickly.

Care Following Surgery:

standard regimen of analgesics and antibiotics. Rinses with chlorhexidine and soft diet. Unless exposed or symptomatic, the miniplate is often kept in place; a second surgery is not necessary unless it is necessary.

Monitoring of Follow-Up and Outcomes:

* Frequent follow-up appointments at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks.
* intra-arch molar distance measurement with model analysis or digital calipers.
* Using bite analysis or occlusal markers,

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Age ≥16 years

* Both gender
* CT scan confirmation of a sagittal or para-sagittal palatal fracture
* Dentate patients whose first molars are intact

Exclusion Criteria

* • Transverse or comminuted palatal fractures

* Patients with edentulous teeth
* Coagulopathies or serious systemic diseases
* Patients who decline to follow up
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Muhammad Hassan

Muhammad Hassan

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Services Institute of Medical Sciences Lahore

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Muhammad Hassan, BDS

Role: CONTACT

+923012540601

Shanza Rehman, BDS

Role: CONTACT

+923368821994

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Muhammad Hassan, BDS

Role: primary

+923012540601

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

8. Bej A, Mishra S, Padhiary SK, Sahoo S, Kadam DR. A Prospective Study on Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transmucosal Plate and Intra-arch Wire Fixation in the Management of Palatal Fracture. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2025 Jun 8:1-6.

Reference Type RESULT

Broaddus WC, Holloway KL, Winters CJ, Bullock MR, Graham RS, Mathern BE, Ward JD, Young HF. Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation: a prospective randomized comparison. J Neurosurg. 2002 Feb;96(2):244-7. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.2.0244.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11838797 (View on PubMed)

Cienfuegos R, Sierra E, Ortiz B, Fernandez G. Treatment of Palatal Fractures by Osteosynthesis with 2.0-mm Locking Plates as External Fixator. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010 Dec;3(4):223-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1268519.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22132261 (View on PubMed)

Giri KY, Sahu P, Rastogi S, Dandriyal R, Mall S, Singh AP, Indra B NP, Pratap Singh H. Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):972-8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0764-7. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26604472 (View on PubMed)

Silajiding K, Wusiman P, Yusufu B, Moming A. Three dimensional versus standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Sep;33(9):464-472. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28865605 (View on PubMed)

3. Sharma D, Khan TA, Tripathi GM, Mishra A. Epidemiology, Pattern, and Management of Midsagittal and Parasagittal Palatal Fractures through Placement of Intra-arch Wire. Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice. 2023 Jan 1;4(1):28-32.

Reference Type RESULT

Kumar U, Jain P. Sagittal Maxillary Fracture: Diagnosis and Management. Indian J Plast Surg. 2021 Aug 2;54(3):284-288. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729665. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34667512 (View on PubMed)

Bhargava D, Thomas S, Pandey A. Reduction of Palatal Midline and Para-Midline Fractures Using Intra-arch Wire Fixation Versus Transmucosal Miniplate Stabilization: Prospective Randomized Clinical Study to Evaluate Postoperative Occlusion. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Mar;17(1):71-74. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0980-9. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29382998 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB/2025/1699/SIMS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.