Comparison of Different Methods of Controlling Pain During Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets
NCT ID: NCT05104190
Last Updated: 2021-11-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
148 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-01
2020-06-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
plastic wafers group
In one arm/ group 1 (plastic wafers group), debonding was done by open mouth technique. All brackets were removed using same plier i.e. angled direct bracket remover. Figure pressure in the apical direction was applied concomitantly applied to stabilize each tooth. Loose cotton was used between thumb and tooth during debonding. Arch wires and ligatures were not removed during debonding.
Patient pain score during procedure was measured using visual analogue scale ranging from zero to one hundred (0-100) In
Stabilization of teeth during debonding using fingure pressure and elastic wafer
To control pain during debonding in one group , teeth were stabilized with finger pressure with cotton between finger and teeth and then debonding using open mouth technique was done. In second group teeth were stabilized using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. In order to reduce biasness, all of the patients were debonded with same plier and with wires still ligated to brackets. With the help of VAS, pain score was measured after debonding. A single operator performed complete procedure of debonding and pain recording.
finger pressure group
In another arm/ group 2( finger pressure group) brackets were removed in the same way with the same debonding plier as in group 1 but soft acrylic sheets folded 4 times were placed between upper and lower dentition with the patient biting on this wafer. Wires and ligatures were left tied to brackets during debonding. After the procedure, patient was asked about pain using visual analogue scale.
Stabilization of teeth during debonding using fingure pressure and elastic wafer
To control pain during debonding in one group , teeth were stabilized with finger pressure with cotton between finger and teeth and then debonding using open mouth technique was done. In second group teeth were stabilized using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. In order to reduce biasness, all of the patients were debonded with same plier and with wires still ligated to brackets. With the help of VAS, pain score was measured after debonding. A single operator performed complete procedure of debonding and pain recording.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stabilization of teeth during debonding using fingure pressure and elastic wafer
To control pain during debonding in one group , teeth were stabilized with finger pressure with cotton between finger and teeth and then debonding using open mouth technique was done. In second group teeth were stabilized using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. In order to reduce biasness, all of the patients were debonded with same plier and with wires still ligated to brackets. With the help of VAS, pain score was measured after debonding. A single operator performed complete procedure of debonding and pain recording.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient with history of jaw sugeries.
3. Patients with history of taking medicine periodically or in the last 24 hours (eg, painkillers, corticosteroids, and antiflu drugs),
4. Patient with history of debonded brackets and replacement.
5. Patient with history of tooth transplantation or microscrews placement.
13 Years
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kashif Iqbal
Dr. Kashif Iqbal (orthodontist)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zahra Khalid, BDS, FCPSII
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
AFID
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kashif Iqbal
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Orthodontic pain
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id