Comparison of Different Methods of Controlling Pain During Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets

NCT ID: NCT05104190

Last Updated: 2021-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

148 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose of this study was to evaluate different methods of controlling pain during debonding

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients data was obtained from the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi. One Hundred and ten patients were included in the study, which were divided into two groups, 55 patients in each group, based on method of controlling pain during debonding. To control pain during debonding in one group , teeth were stabilized with finger pressure with cotton between finger and teeth and then debonding using open mouth technique was done. In second group teeth were stabilized using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. In order to reduce biasness, all of the patients were debonded with same plier and with wires still ligated to brackets. With the help of VAS, pain score was measured after debonding. A single operator performed complete procedure of debonding and pain recording.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Orthodontic pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

plastic wafers group

In one arm/ group 1 (plastic wafers group), debonding was done by open mouth technique. All brackets were removed using same plier i.e. angled direct bracket remover. Figure pressure in the apical direction was applied concomitantly applied to stabilize each tooth. Loose cotton was used between thumb and tooth during debonding. Arch wires and ligatures were not removed during debonding.

Patient pain score during procedure was measured using visual analogue scale ranging from zero to one hundred (0-100) In

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stabilization of teeth during debonding using fingure pressure and elastic wafer

Intervention Type OTHER

To control pain during debonding in one group , teeth were stabilized with finger pressure with cotton between finger and teeth and then debonding using open mouth technique was done. In second group teeth were stabilized using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. In order to reduce biasness, all of the patients were debonded with same plier and with wires still ligated to brackets. With the help of VAS, pain score was measured after debonding. A single operator performed complete procedure of debonding and pain recording.

finger pressure group

In another arm/ group 2( finger pressure group) brackets were removed in the same way with the same debonding plier as in group 1 but soft acrylic sheets folded 4 times were placed between upper and lower dentition with the patient biting on this wafer. Wires and ligatures were left tied to brackets during debonding. After the procedure, patient was asked about pain using visual analogue scale.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stabilization of teeth during debonding using fingure pressure and elastic wafer

Intervention Type OTHER

To control pain during debonding in one group , teeth were stabilized with finger pressure with cotton between finger and teeth and then debonding using open mouth technique was done. In second group teeth were stabilized using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. In order to reduce biasness, all of the patients were debonded with same plier and with wires still ligated to brackets. With the help of VAS, pain score was measured after debonding. A single operator performed complete procedure of debonding and pain recording.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stabilization of teeth during debonding using fingure pressure and elastic wafer

To control pain during debonding in one group , teeth were stabilized with finger pressure with cotton between finger and teeth and then debonding using open mouth technique was done. In second group teeth were stabilized using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. In order to reduce biasness, all of the patients were debonded with same plier and with wires still ligated to brackets. With the help of VAS, pain score was measured after debonding. A single operator performed complete procedure of debonding and pain recording.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients between 13-21 years of age who can understand, assess, and answer the questionnaires. 2) No missing teeth except extracted premolars 3) Undergoing upper and lower fixed orthodontic treatment with Roth prescription 0.022-inch metal brackets . 4) Finishing arch wires present for at least two months

Exclusion Criteria

1. The subjects with a previous history of facial or mandibular surgery or syndromes affecting the jaw or face .
2. Patient with history of jaw sugeries.
3. Patients with history of taking medicine periodically or in the last 24 hours (eg, painkillers, corticosteroids, and antiflu drugs),
4. Patient with history of debonded brackets and replacement.
5. Patient with history of tooth transplantation or microscrews placement.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kashif Iqbal

Dr. Kashif Iqbal (orthodontist)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zahra Khalid, BDS, FCPSII

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

AFID

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kashif Iqbal

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Orthodontic pain

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id