Communication in the Surgical Environment

NCT ID: NCT07246226

Last Updated: 2025-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-20

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this evidence implementation is to identify whether the implementation of a surgical briefing protocol promotes the strengthening of communication in the surgical environment of safety in the operating room among the orthopedic surgery team, including nurses, nursing technicians, orthopedic surgeons, and anesthesiologists.

The main question it seeks to answer is: does the surgical briefing protocol used to promote the strengthening of communication in the surgical environment and safety culture in the operating room comply with best practices? Participants will be asked to complete a baseline audit questionnaire, participate in training on the implementation of the surgical briefing protocol, and subsequently complete a follow-up audit questionnaire.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the study is to identify whether the implementation of a surgical briefing protocol promotes the strengthening of the 'communication in the surgical environment' domain of safety climate in the operating room. A multi-method study is proposed to be developed in the surgical center of a university hospital located in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The study will be carried out in two phases: In Phase I, a surgical briefing protocol will be developed, validated and implemented that will follow the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) methodology of evidence implementation. As a support for methodological rigor, the tool SQUIRE2.0 (Standards for QUalityImprovement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process will be used. Finally, Phase II will have a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design, using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room (SAQ/OR). As a support for methodological rigor, the tool Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) will be used. The population will be composed of: nurses, nursing technicians, surgeons and anesthesiologists who work in orthopedic surgery and management of the unit. Regarding sampling, for Phase I of the study, a focus group will be constituted, called a working group (WG), adopting an intentional sampling, ensuring the participation of all health professional categories that work in orthopedic surgery. The inclusion criteria will be health professionals who work at least 20 hours per week, working in orthopedic surgeries and/or managers of the surgical center. For the validation stage, professionals withhigher education with specialization in the operating room (for nursing professionals) or orthopedic surgery (for medical professionals) will be adopted as inclusion criteria, as well as professors and researchers whose lines of research are directly related to surgical communication, patient safety and safety culture. For Phase II, a non-probabilistic sampling will be adopted, the sample calculation will be performed with the aid of the EpiInfo v5.5.9 application, adopting a confidence level of 95%. For this sample, health professionals who work at least 20 hours a week, who work directly or indirectly in patient care and who have been working in the sector for at least one month will be adopted as inclusion criteria. The exclusion criteria were the professionals who will compose the focus group. It is expected to implement a surgical briefing protocol and advance in the implementation of evidence to promote the maturation of the safety culture in the operating room, fostering safer surgical care, especially in this highly specialized sector that is the operating room. In addition to encouraging future studies involving the science of implementation in safety culture, allowing research to be truly focused on the best available evidence. It is intended that the research serves as a source of data on patient safety in the surgical environment and offers an innovative model to evaluate and intervene in complex aspects of the safety culture, involving professionals and senior management in health in the surgical environment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Communication in the Surgical Environment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

surgical team

Participants will complete an audit questionnaire before and after the implementation of the surgical briefing protocol.

Group Type OTHER

Surgical communication training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Seminar on communication in the surgical environment with lectures and training on how to conduct surgical briefings

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgical communication training

Seminar on communication in the surgical environment with lectures and training on how to conduct surgical briefings

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cintia Silva Fassarella

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cintia Silva Fassarella

Doctor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UERJ

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rosilene A Ferreira

Role: CONTACT

5521996756602

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7.924.577

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Facilitating Communication Study
NCT03721952 COMPLETED NA