Does Vnotes Salpingectomy Reduce Ovarian Reserve?

NCT ID: NCT07177144

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-19

Study Completion Date

2025-11-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopy in terms of their effects on ovarian reserve in Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy for Permanent Female Sterilization

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will include participants who apply to our clinic for salpingectomy for contraception and agree to participate in the study. vnotes salpingectomy method or classical laparoscopic salpingectomy will be offered to the patients as two salpingectomy methods and the patient will be included in whichever group in the study. All surgeries will be performed by the same surgeon. 3 months after the date of surgery, the patient will be called for a follow-up for amh repeat and the two groups will be compared both within themselves and with each other to evaluate whether the different surgical technique has an effect on ovarian reserve.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vnotes Salpingectomy Ovarian Reserve

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

vnotes salpingectomy performed

group of women who underwent salpingectomy with the vnotes method for women who wanted to have their tubes removed for contraception

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

anti müllerian hormone

Intervention Type OTHER

participants were checked for amh levels preoperatively

anti müllerian hormon

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

participants were checked for amh levels at 3 months postoperatively.

laparoscopic salpingectomy performed

group of women who underwent salpingectomy with the laparoscopic salpingectomy method for women who wanted to have their tubes removed for contraception

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

anti müllerian hormone

Intervention Type OTHER

participants were checked for amh levels preoperatively

anti müllerian hormon

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

participants were checked for amh levels at 3 months postoperatively.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anti müllerian hormone

participants were checked for amh levels preoperatively

Intervention Type OTHER

anti müllerian hormon

participants were checked for amh levels at 3 months postoperatively.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* to want to have your tubes removed, not to have undergone tubal and ovarian surgery before, not to use hormones and medications that can affect the level of sex hormones and its levels,

Exclusion Criteria

* not being in the specified age range (18-45), having a history of tubal ligation, having tubal cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elif Yıldız

associate professor of gynecology and obstetrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gaziosmanpaşa Education and Research Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yassa M, Kaya C, Kalafat E, Tekin AB, Karakas S, Mutlu MA, Birol P, Tug N. The Comparison of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopy in Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy for Permanent Female Sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Feb;29(2):257-264.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.009. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34411729 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Gaziosmanpasatrehmh

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RCT on 3 Types of Hysterectomy
NCT05971875 RECRUITING NA