Assessment of Women's Sexual Quality of Life After Benign Adnexal Surgery Using vNOTES Approach
NCT ID: NCT05761275
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-01
2027-04-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this RCT is to confirm the non-inferiority of the vNOTES approach for benign adnexal pathology compared to CAL on women's sexual function. Secondary outcomes will evaluate vNOTES's efficiency, morbidity and postoperative complications compared to CAL for benign adnexal surgery. The relationship between adnexal mass morcellation/aspiration and the quality of the histological analysis on surgical specimens will also be evaluated as secondary outcome.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Notes Adnexectomy for Benign Pathology Compared to Laparoscopic Excision
NCT02630329
TUbal LIgation Per Differents Endoscopic Routes and Sexuality (TULIPES)
NCT05910385
Ultrasound Evaluation for Improving Patient Selection in vNOTES
NCT05623514
vNOTES Salpingo-oophorectomy or Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Laparoscopic.
NCT05228938
vNOTES Transvaginal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopy
NCT04324034
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, there are no randomised clinical trials specifically investigating the impact on women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery compared to conventional transabdominal laparoscopy. Patients appear to be more reticent about the vaginal approach to surgery due to fear of possible alteration of their sexual activity afterwards. Indeed, their fears relate to the vaginal scarring that occurs during the vNOTES surgery. The vaginal scar could cause vaginal pain and pain during sexual intercourse, especially if there is a post-operative complication with the vaginal scar. The vaginal scar could also alter women's perception of their bodies during sexual intercourse. This study is necessary to answer these questions and increase women's acceptance of the vNOTES technique for benign adnexal surgery. In this way, women would benefit from the advantages of vNOTES without fearing an impact on their sexual quality of life.
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that the vNOTES technique, although using the vagina as an entry route, does not significantly alter the quality of sexual life of women after benign adnexal surgery compared to conventional transabdominal laparoscopy.
The secondary objectives of this study evaluate the effectiveness of vNOTES (impact on pain, length of stay after surgery and patient satisfaction), complications ( during surgery and up to 30 days after surgery), as well as the relationship between the need to cut the surgical specimen for extraction and the difficulty of microscopic analysis.
All participants in the study, regardless of the surgical technique assigned to them, will complete questionnaires to assess their quality of sexual life before surgery and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. These are the FSFI (female sexual function), CSI-16 (couple satisfaction) and a self-created questionnaire on pain during sex (dyspareunia). These questionnaires will determine whether there is a difference in the women's quality of sexual life before and after surgery, as well as comparing the two surgical techniques. The participants' general and medical data will be collected at the time of study enrolment, during hospitalisation and at one month after surgery to assess the secondary objectives of the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy
Use of conventional transabdominal laparoscopy as the surgical approach to perform the indicated procedure in the included patient with benign adnexal pathology (elective cystectomy/oophorectomy elective salpingectomy or tubal sterilization).
Elective cystectomy
Adnexal cyst removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective oophorectomy
Ovarian removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective salpingectomy
Tubal removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective tubal sterilization
Tubal obstruction as a definitive contraceptive method (tubal cauterization with or without sectioning, partial or total removal of both tubes, or obstruction with small clips/ligatures).
vNOTES
Use of vNOTES (Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) as the surgical approach to perform the indicated procedure in the included patient with benign adnexal pathology (elective cystectomy/oophorectomy elective salpingectomy or tubal sterilization).
Elective cystectomy
Adnexal cyst removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective oophorectomy
Ovarian removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective salpingectomy
Tubal removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective tubal sterilization
Tubal obstruction as a definitive contraceptive method (tubal cauterization with or without sectioning, partial or total removal of both tubes, or obstruction with small clips/ligatures).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Elective cystectomy
Adnexal cyst removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective oophorectomy
Ovarian removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective salpingectomy
Tubal removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.
Elective tubal sterilization
Tubal obstruction as a definitive contraceptive method (tubal cauterization with or without sectioning, partial or total removal of both tubes, or obstruction with small clips/ligatures).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Discernment capacity with oral and written consent signed
* Heterosexual intercourse (with vaginal penetration) within four weeks prior to inclusion in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Suspected rectovaginal/retrocervical endometriosis.
* History of brachytherapy or pelvic radiation.
* Suspected malignancy.
* History of severe pelvic inflammatory disease.
* Active lower genital tract infection.
* Pregnancy.
* Women who do not speak fluent French or English.
* Patients under tutelage (with or without capacity of judgement).
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jean Dubuisson
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jean Dubuisson
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean Dubuisson
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Geneva
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Geneva University Hospital
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jean Dubuisson
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Krull E, Lambat Emery S, Viviano M, Aerts L, Petignat P, Dubuisson J. Assessment of women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery using vNOTES approach in comparison to conventional laparoscopy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 7;13(9):e073691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073691.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-00407
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.