Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-31
2025-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A prospective analysis will conducted at a tertiary hospital from January 2025 to February 2025. Patients aged 40-80 who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications will included. Outcomes will assessed included surgical outcomes, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and complication rates.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study Comparing Classic Vaginal Hysterectomy to vNOTES Hysterectomy
NCT05150275
vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Trial on Pain and Recovery"
NCT07306507
Study Evaluating the Success Rate of Outpatient Management of the Total Benign Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Compared to Each of the Two Laparoscopic Routes (Conventional and Robot-assisted).
NCT06471049
ONSD as an ICP Marker in vNOTES and TLH
NCT07250178
Vaginal NOTES Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT04886791
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
vNOTES hysterectomy for benign indications
vNOTES
vNOTES for benign hysterectomy
Vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications
vaginal hysterectomy
vaginal hysterectomy for benign hysterectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
vNOTES
vNOTES for benign hysterectomy
vaginal hysterectomy
vaginal hysterectomy for benign hysterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* undergo hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions
Exclusion Criteria
* suspected gynecologic malignancies,
* endometriosis,
* tubal-ovarian abscesses,
* pelvic organ prolapse exceeding grade 2,
* individuals who refused to participate in the study
40 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehmet Mete Kırlangıç
Assoc Prof
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kartal Dr Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Gazi Yıldız, Assoc Prof
Role: backup
Pınar Yıldız, MD
Role: backup
Esra Keleş, Assoc Prof
Role: backup
Pınar Birol İlter, MD
Role: backup
Kasım Turan, MD
Role: backup
Emre Mat, Assoc Prof
Role: backup
Mehmet Mete Kırlangıç, Assoc Prof
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yildiz P, Keles E, Yildiz G, Birol Ilter P, Temocin RB, Kaya C, Mat E. Health-related quality of life following hysterectomy by vNOTES versus conventional laparoscopy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2024 Aug;33(4):232-236. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2323100. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
Merlier M, Collinet P, Pierache A, Vandendriessche D, Delporte V, Rubod C, Cosson M, Giraudet G. Is V-NOTES Hysterectomy as Safe and Feasible as Outpatient Surgery Compared with Vaginal Hysterectomy? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 May;29(5):665-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol B, Bosteels J. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15504.
Pickett CM, Seeratan DD, Mol BWJ, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Bonestroo T, Aarts JW. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021/514/214/25
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.