Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Shull Suspension Comparison Trial

NCT ID: NCT05856201

Last Updated: 2023-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized multicenter study whose objective is to compare two surgical techniques routinely used at our center for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse (laparoscopic cervicosacropexis versus colposuspension sec. Shull using v-NOTES).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

patients with pelvic organ prolapse with a stage greater than or equal to stage 2 for the apical compartment who are candidates for surgical correction will be randomized and assigned to one of two treatment groups. The aim is to compare the anatomical, surgical and anesthesiological outcomes between these two surgical techniques, both of which are commonly used in clinical practice for the correction of this type of prolapse.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We will perform a interventional, no profit, prospective, randomized 1:1 multicentre, controlled trial with participating tertiary referral hospital centers in Italy, to compare the laparoscopic cervicosacropexy (CSP) and Shull technique via V-NOTES (VNS) in the management of apical prolapse.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The 6-week examination and review will be performed by the surgeon with all study data and future visits completed by blinded co-authors (Different surgeon or Urogynecology fellows) who will be unaware of group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

laparoscopic cervicosacropexy (CSP)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic cervicosacropexy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The first step consists of a supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation. Anterior and posterior dissection of the vesicovaginal and rectovaginal space. Placing a flexible blade or a Breisky blade in the vagina which is manipulated by the assistant in order to improve exposure of the tissue planes. The retroperitoneum will then be opened from sacral promontory to cervix with the incision just medial to the uterosacral ligament. A low-weight preshaped Y-shaped polypropylene mesh will be secured to the anterior and posterior vagina with four to six separated absorbable 2.0 polyglactin sutures and two nonabsorbable 2.0 prolene sutures can be placed at the level of the remaining cervix. The mesh will be attached to the sacral promontory using two or three nonabsorbable monofilament 2.0 prolene suture. The retroperitoneal space will be closed with continuous 2.0 polyglactin suture or barbed 2.0 absorbable suture material.

Shull technique via V-NOTES (VNS)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Shull technique via V-NOTES

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using a cold-bladed scalpel, pericervical colpotomy and subsequent opening of the Douglas and vesico-uterine space is performed. The following step is forcipressure and section of uterosacral ligaments bilaterally with cold blade scissors and ligation in Polysorb 0. A v-PATH® wall retractor is placed, after insertion of three trocars. Total hysterectomy is then performed by standard V-NOTES technique. After transperitoneal visualization of the ureters bilaterally, the peritoneum is incised between the ureters and the uterosacral ligaments, which are thus bilaterally isolated, and three points in polydioxanone 2/0 are placed per side. The v-PATH wall retractor is then removed. Finally the suspension of the vaginal vault at the uterosacral ligaments is made according to Shull technique. Eventual fascial corrections of concomitant anterior or posterior defects will be associated if needed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic cervicosacropexy

The first step consists of a supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation. Anterior and posterior dissection of the vesicovaginal and rectovaginal space. Placing a flexible blade or a Breisky blade in the vagina which is manipulated by the assistant in order to improve exposure of the tissue planes. The retroperitoneum will then be opened from sacral promontory to cervix with the incision just medial to the uterosacral ligament. A low-weight preshaped Y-shaped polypropylene mesh will be secured to the anterior and posterior vagina with four to six separated absorbable 2.0 polyglactin sutures and two nonabsorbable 2.0 prolene sutures can be placed at the level of the remaining cervix. The mesh will be attached to the sacral promontory using two or three nonabsorbable monofilament 2.0 prolene suture. The retroperitoneal space will be closed with continuous 2.0 polyglactin suture or barbed 2.0 absorbable suture material.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Shull technique via V-NOTES

Using a cold-bladed scalpel, pericervical colpotomy and subsequent opening of the Douglas and vesico-uterine space is performed. The following step is forcipressure and section of uterosacral ligaments bilaterally with cold blade scissors and ligation in Polysorb 0. A v-PATH® wall retractor is placed, after insertion of three trocars. Total hysterectomy is then performed by standard V-NOTES technique. After transperitoneal visualization of the ureters bilaterally, the peritoneum is incised between the ureters and the uterosacral ligaments, which are thus bilaterally isolated, and three points in polydioxanone 2/0 are placed per side. The v-PATH wall retractor is then removed. Finally the suspension of the vaginal vault at the uterosacral ligaments is made according to Shull technique. Eventual fascial corrections of concomitant anterior or posterior defects will be associated if needed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* consecutive women referred to one of the participating centers with symptomatic stage 2 or greater (point C≥ -1 pelvic organ prolapse quantification POP-Q) apical prolapse (uterovaginal) with or without anterior and posterior compartment prolapse will be eligible for inclusion (Criteria for which patients in clinical practice are candidates for one of the two interventions under study)

Exclusion Criteria

* age \<18 years, BMI \> 30,
* previous hysterectomy,
* inability to comprehend questionnaires, to give informed consent and to return for review,
* unable to undergo general anesthesia,
* prior laparoscopic prolapse repair or vaginal mesh prolapse procedure,
* desire for future pregnancy or current pregnancy diagnosis
* severe respiratory comorbidity,
* ASA III patients,
* need for concomitant anti-incontinence procedure.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tommaso Simoncini

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

V-PULSE study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sacrocolpopexy and Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT04410393 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
vNOTES for Salpingo-oophorectomy
NCT04012710 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA