Vaginal Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

NCT ID: NCT06004089

Last Updated: 2023-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy following vaginal hysterectomy, focusing on perioperative and early postoperative results. The impact of V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy on patients' quality of life is investigated using validated assessment tools. Additionally, operative time, complications, pain scores were assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who presented to the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic with complaints related to pelvic organ prolapse, had stage III or IV prolapse according to POP-Q classification, were between 45 and 79 years old, had no contraindications for pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, and were eligible to perform transvaginal NOTES and gave written informed consent were included in the study. Demographic data, age, medical and surgical history, body mass index (BMI), operation time, preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin levels, perioperative complications and length of hospital stay were collected. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy arm

V-NOTES sacrocolpopexy was performed who met the eligibility criteria and gave written informed consent. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Quality of life was evaluated before and 1 month after surgery with the Turkish-validated Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedure involved a single-port laparoscopic surgery through the vaginal route, aiming to restore pelvic floor function by suspending the vagina to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The surgical approach differs from conventional methods, as these procedures are conducted through abdominal or vaginal routes without the aid of laparoscopic cameras, However, in our approach, we uniquely combine the widely acknowledged gold standard sacrocolpopexy procedure using vaginal route with laparoscopic camera assistance. No experimental drugs or devices were employed; only the surgical approach was modified.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

V NOTES Sacrocolpopexy

The procedure involved a single-port laparoscopic surgery through the vaginal route, aiming to restore pelvic floor function by suspending the vagina to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The surgical approach differs from conventional methods, as these procedures are conducted through abdominal or vaginal routes without the aid of laparoscopic cameras, However, in our approach, we uniquely combine the widely acknowledged gold standard sacrocolpopexy procedure using vaginal route with laparoscopic camera assistance. No experimental drugs or devices were employed; only the surgical approach was modified.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who presented to the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic with complaints related to pelvic organ prolapse, had stage III or IV prolapse according to POP-Q classification, were between 45 and 79 years old, had no contraindications for pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, and were eligible to perform transvaginal NOTES were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with previous pelvic inflammatory disease, deep endometriosis, severe pelvic adhesions, and patients who are at risk of gynecological malignancy and are not suitable for transvaginal surgery were not included in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elif Cansu Gundogdu

Specialist doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elif Gundogdu, M.D.Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital

Istanbul, Kartal, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022/514/222/30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.