Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Trans-vaginal Repair for Anterior Rectocele.
NCT ID: NCT06633172
Last Updated: 2024-10-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-01
2023-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transvaginal Versus Transobturator Paravaginal Repair
NCT03489902
Abdominal Versus Vaginal Hysteropexy
NCT03494582
Abdominal Pectopexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy.
NCT04856709
A Novel Approach to Posterior Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
NCT04358978
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
NCT01347021
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Constipation can be managed with dietary measures, laxatives, and biofeedback training , which can be beneficial for patients with modest symptoms. Surgical treatment is recommended if conservative treatment fails to alleviate symptoms . However, some patients may be left with constipation, fecal incontinence, incomplete bowel evacuation, or sexual dysfunction despite the correction of the anatomical defect. The selection of patients for surgical intervention for symptomatic rectocele remains a matter of debate.
There is still a controversy between abdominal approaches and the transanal, transperineal, and transvaginal approaches as the optimal surgical approach to treat complex rectocele. While the latter is preferred by gynecologists, the former has increased in popularity among colorectal surgeons, aided in part by the growing interest in minimally invasive surgery.
This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of LVMR in comparison with TVR of anterior rectocele regarding the improvement in constipation score and sexual-related quality of life, surgical outcomes and postoperative complications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy
performing laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for group of patients to find out its efficacy
laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy
performing ventral mesh rectopexy via laparoscopic surgery to correct the anterior rectocele.
Trans vaginal repair
performing trans vaginal repair for the 2nd group to find out its efficacy.
Trans vaginal repair
performing repair of the rectocele through the recto vaginal septum repair.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy
performing ventral mesh rectopexy via laparoscopic surgery to correct the anterior rectocele.
Trans vaginal repair
performing repair of the rectocele through the recto vaginal septum repair.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* anterior rectocele larger than 3 cm in size with retention of the contrast in the rectocele on defecography.
* excessive straining, sense of incomplete evacuation, the need for digital manipulation during defecation, or dyspareunia.
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with recurrent rectocele
* complete external rectal prolapse
* isolated anismus
* connective tissue disease
* patients with slow-transit constipation
* fecal incontinence (FI), or abnormal thyroid function.
30 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmad Sakr
principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmad Sakr, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mansoura University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mansoura university
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sanad A, Sakr A, Elfeki H, Omar W, Thabet W, Fouda E, Abdallah E, Elbaz SA. Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy versus trans-vaginal repair in management of anterior rectocele, a randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2025 May 27;29(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03145-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11111
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.