Single Versus Multi-port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Repair of Vaginal Apex Prolapse

NCT ID: NCT03034499

Last Updated: 2019-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-20

Study Completion Date

2019-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A prospective randomized controlled study intended to compare the efficacy of 2 methods of robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse:

1. Via single-port.
2. Via multi-port.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One hundred female patients diagnosed with vaginal apex prolapse will be recruited to a prospective randomized controlled study intended to compare the efficacy of 2 methods of robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy:

1. Via single-port.
2. Via multi-port. The patients will be evaluated and randomized 2 weeks before the expected date of surgery during which eligibility will be examined.

Patients' electronic files will be reviewed post operatively to acquire information regarding medical history, prolapse scores, surgical information, anesthesia information and surgical complications.

Patients will have 3 week and 3 month post operative follow-up sessions to determine surgical success, late complications and patient satisfaction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-port sacrocolpopexy

Patients with vaginal apex prolapse randomized to undergo repair by single-port sacrocolpopexy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Single-port sacrocolpopexy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single-port sacrocolpopexy surgery for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse.

Multi-port sacrocolpopexy

Patients with vaginal apex prolapse randomized to undergo repair by multi- port sacrocolpopexy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multi-port sacrocolpopexy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Multi-port sacrocolpopexy surgery for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single-port sacrocolpopexy

Single-port sacrocolpopexy surgery for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Multi-port sacrocolpopexy

Multi-port sacrocolpopexy surgery for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patients with vaginal apex prolapse that are eligible for repair by sacrocolpopexy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients after previous hysterectomy.
* Patients after previous surgical procedures for prolapse repair.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rambam Health Care Campus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ROY LAUTERBACH MD

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roy Lauterbach, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rambam Health Care Campus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rambam health care campus

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Matanes E, Boulus S, Lauterbach R, Amit A, Weiner Z, Lowenstein L. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4):358.e1-358.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.048. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31589864 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0631-16-RMB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.