Abdominal Versus Vaginal Hysteropexy

NCT ID: NCT03494582

Last Updated: 2018-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the vaginal versus the abdominal approach for the management of uterine prolapse

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

this study compares The unilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy with prolene sutures versus the abdominal sacral hysteropexy using Mersilene suture for the management of uterine prolapse

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uterine Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sacral Hysteropexy

Abdominal approach for uterine suspension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sacral Hysteropexy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Abdominal approach for uterine suspension

sacrospinous Hysteropexy

Transvaginal approach for uterine suspension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

sacrospinous Hysteropexy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvaginal approach for uterine suspension

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sacral Hysteropexy

Abdominal approach for uterine suspension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sacrospinous Hysteropexy

Transvaginal approach for uterine suspension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Uterine Prolapse

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous prolapse surgery Hereditary Connective tissue disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hamdy Ahmed Saaid

Fellow of OBS/GYN

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hamdy HA Ahmed, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ain Shams University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Urogynecology Unit

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AVVCP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pectopexy Autologous Vs Mesh
NCT06524700 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA