Comparison of Anatomic Results Between Bilateral and Conventional Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy
NCT ID: NCT02667002
Last Updated: 2022-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563
Abdominal Pectopexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy.
NCT04856709
The Application of Vaginal Manipulator in Abdominal Hysterectomy Operations
NCT05420662
Evaluation of the Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy Surgeries Performed Without Mesh in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06176521
Sacrocolpopexy and Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT04410393
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bilateral Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy
Bilateral abdominal sacral hysteropexy will be perform in 10 patients. One month after patients will be evaluate by MRI and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) form.
Bilateral Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy
The mesh will be fixed right and left side of sacrum.
Classic Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy
Conventional abdominal sacral hysteropexy will be perform in 10 patients. One month after patients will be evaluate by MRI and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) form.
Conventional abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy
The mesh will be fixed only right side of sacrum
Women with no uterovaginal prolapsed
Ten nulliparous participants with no uterovaginal prolapsed will be evaluate by MRI and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) form.
Nulliparous women with no uterovaginal prolapsed
This will be control group which consistent patients with no uterovaginal prolapse.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bilateral Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy
The mesh will be fixed right and left side of sacrum.
Conventional abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy
The mesh will be fixed only right side of sacrum
Nulliparous women with no uterovaginal prolapsed
This will be control group which consistent patients with no uterovaginal prolapse.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehmet Baki Senturk
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mehmet Baki Şentürk, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jager W, Mirenska O, Brugge S. Surgical treatment of mixed and urge urinary incontinence in women. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;74(2):157-64. doi: 10.1159/000339972. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
Sze EH, Meranus J, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Karram MM. Vaginal configuration on MRI after abdominal sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):375-9; discussion 379-80. doi: 10.1007/s001920170016.
Joukhadar R, Meyberg-Solomayer G, Hamza A, Radosa J, Bader W, Barski D, Ismaeel F, Schneider G, Solomayer E, Baum S. A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:860784. doi: 10.1155/2015/860784. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
162
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.