Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension

NCT ID: NCT05586984

Last Updated: 2022-10-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-26

Study Completion Date

2029-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transvaginal or transabdominal surgeries are current choices of uterus-preserving surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse.

Laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension, a modified surgical approach of uterine suspension from bilateral abdominal wall fascia, performed with expected safety and simplicity of surgery besides advantages including small wound incision and fast recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. This trial aim to discuss the therapeutic efficacy, long term safety, and adverse events of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension and compare with the conventional transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with native tissue repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pelvic organ prolapse can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Patients who are unsatisfied with conservative treatment or with severe symptoms often seek for surgical intervention. Transvaginal or transabdominal surgeries are current choices of uterus-preserving surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is the current trend for laparoscopic surgery, with small incisional wound, fast recovery, and low recurrence rate as advantages. However, laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is often regarded as time consuming and ous sometimes hazard given the complexity of surgical technique and the anatomy of the presacral region. Few cases with severe complications such as vascular injuries, sacral nerve root injuries, and diskitis had been reported with laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in previous studies.

Laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension, a modified surgical approach of uterine suspension from bilateral abdominal wall fascia, is therefore proposed in our study. The most significant benefits of this novel approach include safety and simplicity of surgery besides advantages including small wound incision and fast recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. This trial aim to discuss the therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension and compare with the transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with native tissue repair. Other results include safety and adverse events of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension in long term follow up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Uterine Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension

Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension for apical prolapse. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.

Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension done with four trocar sites. Fix a 1.5cm\*32cm mesh to uterus at anterior lower segment and bilateral round ligaments by non-absorbable sutures (Surgilon 2-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), and to lateral abdominal fascia by non-absorbable sutures (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Reperitonization done to avoid mesh exposure in peritoneal cavity. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.

Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation

Uterus-preserving transvaginal sacrospinous fixation for apical prolapse. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.

Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation done by hand suturing uterus to right sacrospinous ligament with non-absorbable suture (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension

Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension done with four trocar sites. Fix a 1.5cm\*32cm mesh to uterus at anterior lower segment and bilateral round ligaments by non-absorbable sutures (Surgilon 2-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), and to lateral abdominal fascia by non-absorbable sutures (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Reperitonization done to avoid mesh exposure in peritoneal cavity. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation

Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation done by hand suturing uterus to right sacrospinous ligament with non-absorbable suture (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* older than 21 years old.
* uterine prolapse stage 2 at least, defined by C point distal to -1cm by POP-Q system.
* patients willing to receive a uterine-preserving surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, and is suitable for anesthesia after evaluation.
* patients who had or had not received conservative treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.
* patients able and willing to finish the questionnaire evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria

* patient who had received a previous hysterectomy, or is planning on concomitant hysterectomy in the surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
* patient who had received a previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
* patient with history of adverse events following a synthetic mesh.
* patients with chronic or acute pelvic pain.
* patients who had received abdominal or pelvic irradiation.
* patients who cannot receive either surgery due to comorbidity.
* patients pregnant or with future plan of pregnancy.
* patients with vaginal length less than 5cm.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yu Fang Huang

Professor Yu Fang Huang

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yu Fang Huang, MD

Role: CONTACT

886-6-2353535 ext. 3104

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yu Fang Huang, MD

Role: primary

886-6-2353535 ext. 3104

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

111-NCKUH-CTC--IIT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Sacrocolpopexy and Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT04410393 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING