Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
NCT ID: NCT05586984
Last Updated: 2022-10-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-26
2029-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension, a modified surgical approach of uterine suspension from bilateral abdominal wall fascia, performed with expected safety and simplicity of surgery besides advantages including small wound incision and fast recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. This trial aim to discuss the therapeutic efficacy, long term safety, and adverse events of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension and compare with the conventional transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with native tissue repair.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
NCT05682989
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair
NCT05143658
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331
The Clinical Outcome of TVM or LSC Mesh Suspension for POP
NCT04139083
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension, a modified surgical approach of uterine suspension from bilateral abdominal wall fascia, is therefore proposed in our study. The most significant benefits of this novel approach include safety and simplicity of surgery besides advantages including small wound incision and fast recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. This trial aim to discuss the therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension and compare with the transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with native tissue repair. Other results include safety and adverse events of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension in long term follow up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension for apical prolapse. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension done with four trocar sites. Fix a 1.5cm\*32cm mesh to uterus at anterior lower segment and bilateral round ligaments by non-absorbable sutures (Surgilon 2-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), and to lateral abdominal fascia by non-absorbable sutures (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Reperitonization done to avoid mesh exposure in peritoneal cavity. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation
Uterus-preserving transvaginal sacrospinous fixation for apical prolapse. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation
Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation done by hand suturing uterus to right sacrospinous ligament with non-absorbable suture (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension done with four trocar sites. Fix a 1.5cm\*32cm mesh to uterus at anterior lower segment and bilateral round ligaments by non-absorbable sutures (Surgilon 2-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), and to lateral abdominal fascia by non-absorbable sutures (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Reperitonization done to avoid mesh exposure in peritoneal cavity. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation
Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation done by hand suturing uterus to right sacrospinous ligament with non-absorbable suture (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* uterine prolapse stage 2 at least, defined by C point distal to -1cm by POP-Q system.
* patients willing to receive a uterine-preserving surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, and is suitable for anesthesia after evaluation.
* patients who had or had not received conservative treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.
* patients able and willing to finish the questionnaire evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria
* patient who had received a previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
* patient with history of adverse events following a synthetic mesh.
* patients with chronic or acute pelvic pain.
* patients who had received abdominal or pelvic irradiation.
* patients who cannot receive either surgery due to comorbidity.
* patients pregnant or with future plan of pregnancy.
* patients with vaginal length less than 5cm.
21 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yu Fang Huang
Professor Yu Fang Huang
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan City, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
111-NCKUH-CTC--IIT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.