The Clinical Outcome of TVM or LSC Mesh Suspension for POP

NCT ID: NCT04139083

Last Updated: 2019-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

466 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aim to assess the surgical outcomes of transvaginal mesh (TVM) and laparoscopic (LSC) mesh suspension. During the study period, all women with main uterine prolapse stage II or greater defined by the POP quantification staging system receiving TVM or LSC mesh suspension were retrospectively recruited. Clinical evaluations before and 6 months after surgery included pelvic examination, urodynamic study, and a personal interview to evaluate urinary and sexual symptoms using questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system receiving TVM or LSC mesh suspension surgeries at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan were included. The investigators excluded women with a hypertrophic uterus, huge fibroids, history of cervical dysplasia or endometrial pathology, history of postmenopausal bleeding in the past 12 months, and those unwilling to preserve their uterus. Concomitant mid-urethral sling operations were performed in women with current urodynamic stress incontinence unless the participants did not prefer a concomitant surgery. Cervical amputation was performed if the corpus/cervix ratio was less than 1 on the ultrasound. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy were performed as needs.

The clinical evaluations consisted of a detailed history before and 6 months after surgery, including urinary analysis, pelvic examination using POP-Q system, urodynamic studies (UDS), transabdominal ultrasound, and personal interview to identify urinary and sexual symptoms with the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), the short forms of Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire, and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6). Urinary symptoms with the standardized questionnaire taking into account the 2002 ICS definitions. The participants were asked to fill out the visual analog scale (VAS) scores during the postoperative day 1 round. Urodynamic studies, including non-instrumented uroflowmetry, filling and voiding cystometry, and urethral pressure profilometry, were performed according to the recommendations by the International Continence Society with a 6-channel urodynamic monitor (MMS; UD2000, Enschede, Netherlands). Any uninhibited detrusor contraction during filling cystometry was deemed positive for detrusor overactivity (DO).

As a follow-up, postoperative outpatient visits were at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months and then semiannually beyond one year. Pelvic examination was performed routinely in every visit to clinics. Recurrence was defined as the most dependent portion of POP stage II or greater. The Clavien-Dindo grading was used for the classification of the intraoperative and postoperative complications of Long mesh surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TVM group

Women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system treated with TVM

TVM

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvaginal mesh kit is delivered into the pelvis via vagina route.

LSC mesh suspension group

Women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system treated with LSC mesh suspension

LSC mesh suspension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Long mesh, a synthetic T-shaped mesh (Gynemsh, Ethicon, San Lorenzo, Puerto Rico), is delivered into the pelvic cavity. Bilateral mesh arms are extracted outside trocar wounds bilaterally to stabilize mesh position. The center piece is fixed to the cervix with 5mm ProTack screws (Covidien, New Haven, Connecticut). Fixation is strengthened with Stratafix 2-0 sutures (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), followed by Tisseel fibrin sealant (Baxter, Deerfield, Illinois) for better hemostasis among surrounding tissues. An extraperitoneal tunnel is created along the left round ligament until reaching 2cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). One arm of the long mesh is pulled out along the tunnel underneath round ligament and fixed with the fascia of oblique abdominis. The same procedure is repeated for the contralateral side. Bilateral round ligaments and the mesh arms are sutured continuously with Stratafix 2-0.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LSC mesh suspension

Long mesh, a synthetic T-shaped mesh (Gynemsh, Ethicon, San Lorenzo, Puerto Rico), is delivered into the pelvic cavity. Bilateral mesh arms are extracted outside trocar wounds bilaterally to stabilize mesh position. The center piece is fixed to the cervix with 5mm ProTack screws (Covidien, New Haven, Connecticut). Fixation is strengthened with Stratafix 2-0 sutures (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), followed by Tisseel fibrin sealant (Baxter, Deerfield, Illinois) for better hemostasis among surrounding tissues. An extraperitoneal tunnel is created along the left round ligament until reaching 2cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). One arm of the long mesh is pulled out along the tunnel underneath round ligament and fixed with the fascia of oblique abdominis. The same procedure is repeated for the contralateral side. Bilateral round ligaments and the mesh arms are sutured continuously with Stratafix 2-0.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TVM

Transvaginal mesh kit is delivered into the pelvis via vagina route.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with mainly uterine prolapse stage II or greater as defined by the POP-Q staging system

Exclusion Criteria

* A hypertrophic uterus, huge fibroids
* History of cervical dysplasia or endometrial pathology
* History of postmenopausal bleeding in the past 12 months
* Unwilling to preserve their uterus
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cheng-Yu Long, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaohsiung Municipal University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, Goldman HB, Huser M, Milani AL, Moran PA, Schaer GN, Withagen MI. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Apr;27(4):655-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3003-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26984443 (View on PubMed)

Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, Richardson ML, Book NM, Yip S, Saguan D, Gross C, Evans J, Lopes VV, Harvie HS, Sung VW. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):470.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23921090 (View on PubMed)

Wu MP, Long CY, Huang KH, Chu CC, Liang CC, Tang CH. Changing trends of surgical approaches for uterine prolapse: an 11-year population-based nationwide descriptive study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jul;23(7):865-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1647-1. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22270728 (View on PubMed)

Long CY, Wang CL, Ker CR, Juan YS, Tsai EM, Lin KL. Laparoscopic Organopexy with Non-mesh Genital (LONG) Suspension: A Novel Uterine Preservation Procedure for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 20;8(1):4872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23285-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29559709 (View on PubMed)

Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 1;10(10):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27696355 (View on PubMed)

Long CY, Hsu CS, Wu CH, Liu CM, Wang CL, Tsai EM. Three-year outcome of transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Mar;161(1):105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22226537 (View on PubMed)

Ker CR, Lin KL, Loo ZX, Juan YS, Long CY. Comparison of UpholdTM Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29930249 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic surgical mesh implants.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KMUHIRB-E(I)-20190015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA