Comparing the Efficacy of TU-LESS and vNOTES for Hysterectomy of Enlarged Uterus

NCT ID: NCT06663553

Last Updated: 2025-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

210 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2028-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Enlarged uterus is frequently encountered in clinical practice, and its incidence due to conditions such as adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, and other gynecological disorders has steadily increased over the years statistically. For example, greater healthcare awareness has led to more frequent early diagnoses of these conditions, contributing to the observed rise in incidence. Additionally, increasing life expectancy results in more women reaching the perimenopausal and postmenopausal stages, during which conditions like uterine fibroids and adenomyosis become more prevalent. For these women, hysterectomy (removal of the entire uterus) is often the recommended option of treatment.

With advances in surgical techniques over recent decades, there has been a notable shift from traditional open abdominal surgeries to minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted, significantly reducing the size and number of incisions required, thereby promoting faster recovery, minimizing postoperative pain, and reducing the risk of complications.

However, conventional multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy still presents certain challenges, such as large uterus extraction following resection, and concerns about healing of incisions. In contrast, innovative techniques like Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery(TU-LESS) and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery(vNOTES) both take advantage of natural anatomical openings to achieve minimal or no visible scarring. Studies demonstrate that these techniques provide superior outcomes in terms of reduced pain, faster recovery, and quicker return to daily activities compared to traditional multi-port laparoscopic approaches.

Yet a direct comparison of the efficacy of these two methods in real-world, particularly for enlarged uterus, remains inconclusive. Thus this study aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of these two techniques in patients with enlarged uteri. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two surgical approaches, ensuring an unbiased comparison of the efficacy of the procedures in terms of healing status and recovery time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Enlarged uterus, mainly caused by adenomyosis, is often associated with symptoms like compression of intestines and urethra(presenting as constipation, urinary frequency, and urgency), dysmenorrhea, menstrual irregularity, and anemia due to menorrhagia. A hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) is often recommended, especially in cases where conservative management like medical treatment fails.

Among all the methods of hysterectomy, TU-LESS and vNOTES are noted for minimized invasiveness and fast recovery. As vNOTES is performed through the vagina and TU-LESS involves a single incision through the umbilicus, they both utilize natural anatomical openings, resulting in minimal to no visible scarring.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Enlarged Uterus Adenomyosis Uterine Fibroids (UF)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Patients will remain blinded to their surgical methods in 24 hours following the operation. To achieve this, we will apply wound pads to each patient's abdomen as the wounds typically seen in tradi tional laparoscopy procedures, no matter whether actual wounds exist.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TU-LESS for hysterectomy

Patients diagnosed with enlarged uteri following a bimanual examination, with confirmation of the size and nature of the enlargement through imaging techniques such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TU-LESS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients in TU-LESS group will receive transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy

vNOTES for hysterectomy

Patients diagnosed with enlarged uteri following a bimanual examination, with confirmation of the size and nature of the enlargement through imaging techniques such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

vNOTES

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients in vNOTES group will receive transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TU-LESS

patients in TU-LESS group will receive transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

vNOTES

patients in vNOTES group will receive transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible women aged 18-70 years.
* Women with indications for enlarged uterine volumes who are planning to under go total hysterectomy. Uterine size should exceed that of a 3-month pregnancy (uterine weight ≥ 280 g).
* Patients are willing to be randomly assigned to undergo any of both approaches.
* Patients who are willing to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals who are virgins or have vaginal stenosis.
* Patients requiring concurrent surgical intervention for conditions such as ovarian cysts or lesions of the vulva, vagina, appendix, etc.
* presence of uterus exceeding approximately 20 gestational weeks in size (about 900-1000g), which is beyond the limitations of a single-site laparoscopic approach due to concerns regarding technical feasibility and safety
* Presence of malignancy or strong suspicion of malignancy that may alter the planned surgical approach.
* History of two or more pelvic surgeries or suspected severe pelvic adhesions (rectovaginal examination suggesting rectovaginal endometriosis or limited uterine mobility).
* History of peritoneal dialysis, pelvic radiation therapy and pelvic tuberculosis treated with laparoscopic surgery.
* Patients with prolapse or pelvic inflammation.
* Diabetes mellitus with poor blood glucose control.
* Body mass index greater than 30 kg/m².
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West China Second University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hongyu Jin

lecturer and gynecological surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West China Second University Hospital

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hongyu Jin, MD

Role: primary

02885244323

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, Vadora E. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1561-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127596.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12501064 (View on PubMed)

Zhang W, Deng L, Yang F, Liu J, Chen S, You X, Gou J, Zi D, Li Y, Qi X, Wang Y, Zheng Y. Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):e074478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074478.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38199630 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020079JHY

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.