Comparing the Efficacy of TU-LESS and vNOTES for Hysterectomy of Enlarged Uterus
NCT ID: NCT06663553
Last Updated: 2025-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
210 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-01
2028-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
With advances in surgical techniques over recent decades, there has been a notable shift from traditional open abdominal surgeries to minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted, significantly reducing the size and number of incisions required, thereby promoting faster recovery, minimizing postoperative pain, and reducing the risk of complications.
However, conventional multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy still presents certain challenges, such as large uterus extraction following resection, and concerns about healing of incisions. In contrast, innovative techniques like Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery(TU-LESS) and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery(vNOTES) both take advantage of natural anatomical openings to achieve minimal or no visible scarring. Studies demonstrate that these techniques provide superior outcomes in terms of reduced pain, faster recovery, and quicker return to daily activities compared to traditional multi-port laparoscopic approaches.
Yet a direct comparison of the efficacy of these two methods in real-world, particularly for enlarged uterus, remains inconclusive. Thus this study aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of these two techniques in patients with enlarged uteri. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two surgical approaches, ensuring an unbiased comparison of the efficacy of the procedures in terms of healing status and recovery time.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
VNOTES and Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Indications
NCT06776718
vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Trial on Pain and Recovery"
NCT07306507
Study Evaluating the Success Rate of Outpatient Management of the Total Benign Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Compared to Each of the Two Laparoscopic Routes (Conventional and Robot-assisted).
NCT06471049
Ultrasound Evaluation for Improving Patient Selection in vNOTES
NCT05623514
Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Versus or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT05884658
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among all the methods of hysterectomy, TU-LESS and vNOTES are noted for minimized invasiveness and fast recovery. As vNOTES is performed through the vagina and TU-LESS involves a single incision through the umbilicus, they both utilize natural anatomical openings, resulting in minimal to no visible scarring.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TU-LESS for hysterectomy
Patients diagnosed with enlarged uteri following a bimanual examination, with confirmation of the size and nature of the enlargement through imaging techniques such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
TU-LESS
patients in TU-LESS group will receive transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy
vNOTES for hysterectomy
Patients diagnosed with enlarged uteri following a bimanual examination, with confirmation of the size and nature of the enlargement through imaging techniques such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
vNOTES
patients in vNOTES group will receive transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TU-LESS
patients in TU-LESS group will receive transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy
vNOTES
patients in vNOTES group will receive transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women with indications for enlarged uterine volumes who are planning to under go total hysterectomy. Uterine size should exceed that of a 3-month pregnancy (uterine weight ≥ 280 g).
* Patients are willing to be randomly assigned to undergo any of both approaches.
* Patients who are willing to sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients requiring concurrent surgical intervention for conditions such as ovarian cysts or lesions of the vulva, vagina, appendix, etc.
* presence of uterus exceeding approximately 20 gestational weeks in size (about 900-1000g), which is beyond the limitations of a single-site laparoscopic approach due to concerns regarding technical feasibility and safety
* Presence of malignancy or strong suspicion of malignancy that may alter the planned surgical approach.
* History of two or more pelvic surgeries or suspected severe pelvic adhesions (rectovaginal examination suggesting rectovaginal endometriosis or limited uterine mobility).
* History of peritoneal dialysis, pelvic radiation therapy and pelvic tuberculosis treated with laparoscopic surgery.
* Patients with prolapse or pelvic inflammation.
* Diabetes mellitus with poor blood glucose control.
* Body mass index greater than 30 kg/m².
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
West China Second University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hongyu Jin
lecturer and gynecological surgeon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
West China Second University Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, Vadora E. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1561-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127596.
Zhang W, Deng L, Yang F, Liu J, Chen S, You X, Gou J, Zi D, Li Y, Qi X, Wang Y, Zheng Y. Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):e074478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074478.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020079JHY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.