RCT on 3 Types of Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT05971875

Last Updated: 2024-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled trial comparing the vaginal, vNOTES ( vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) or laparoscopic approach for hysterectomy in women with benign gynaecological disease

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multi-center pragmatic non-blinded RCT including 1000 women 18-75 years in need of hysterectomy for benign disease; comparing VH vs vNOTES or LH vs vNOTES.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Minimally Invasive Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

vNOTES vs Vaginal Hysterectomy

Group A: If VH is concidered safe and feasable; the patient is randomized between VH and vNOTES

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

vNOTES vs Vaginal Hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Comparison of vNOTES vs VH

vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

If VH is not concidered safe and feasable; The patient is randomized between LH and vNOTES

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Comparison of vNOTES vs LH

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

vNOTES vs Vaginal Hysterectomy

Comparison of vNOTES vs VH

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Comparison of vNOTES vs LH

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Women aged 18 to 75 years regardless of parity with benign indication for hysterectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* Women with a stage II+ prolapse in need of a hysterectomy as part of vaginal prolapse repair
* hysterectomy due to suspected endometriosis
* subtotal hysterectomy
* history of rectal surgery
* suspected malignancy
* suspected obliteration of the pouch of Douglas following severe PID or other causes
* active lower genital tract infection
* pregnancy
* failure to provide written informed consent prior to surgery
* requirement of in-patient care due to other co-morbidities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr Jan Baekelandt, MD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Jan Baekelandt, MD

Prof

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

JAn Baekelandt

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Imeldaziekenhuis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Zadar, , Croatia

Site Status RECRUITING

Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Croatia Sweden

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jan Baekelandt, Prof

Role: CONTACT

0032499471371

Jan Baekelandt

Role: CONTACT

0032499471371

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Luka Matak

Role: primary

Andrea Stuart, phD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baekelandt JF, Stuart A, Wagenius J, Laenen A, Mol BW, Deprest J, Bosteels JJA. VaNoLaH trial: a study protocol-a multinational randomised controlled trial including two identical substudies comparing vaginal versus vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) hysterectomy or laparoscopic versus vNOTES hysterectomy. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 23;14(4):e081979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081979.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38658010 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Vanolah

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

vNOTES for Salpingo-oophorectomy
NCT04012710 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA