Ovarian Reserve Following Bilateral Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Section

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aforementioned study was designed to evaluate short term ovarian reserve as assessed by anti-Mullerian hormone(AMH) levels following bilateral salpingectomy versus tubal ligation, as part of cesarean sections performed in women requesting future sterilization. The investigators aim to recruit 3 groups of 15 women undergoing elective cesarean section at the investigators' institution, 2 of which request sterilization (allocated to tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy) and one undergoing solely cesarean section. The groups will have blood drawn for AMH prior to the procedure and at a post-operation visit 8 weeks following. This is preformed in light of validated data offering better sterilization and possible diminished future risk of ovarian cancer with salpingectomy. Also, is has been proved to be just as safe as tubal ligation. This will be performed as a randomized controlled trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Reserve

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Study focus ovarian reserve

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bilateral salpingectomy

Cesarean section with bilateral salpingectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bilateral salpingectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical bilateral removal of fallopian tubes (not involving ovaries)

Tubal ligation

Cesarean section with tubal ligation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tubal ligation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral ligation of fallopian tubes (not involving ovaries)

No intervention

Cesarean section with no additional intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bilateral salpingectomy

Surgical bilateral removal of fallopian tubes (not involving ovaries)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tubal ligation

Bilateral ligation of fallopian tubes (not involving ovaries)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women undergoing elective cesrean section at the investigators' institution, requesting sterilization, willing to have blood withdrawn for AMH levels prior to surgery, willing to participate in 8 weeks post-operation follow up with blood withdrawn

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-elective cesarean section, non willing to have blood withdrawn or participate in follow up, prior salpingectomy, prior premature ovarian failure/egg donation

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hadas Ganer Herman

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McAlpine JN, Hanley GE, Woo MM, Tone AA, Rozenberg N, Swenerton KD, Gilks CB, Finlayson SJ, Huntsman DG, Miller DM; Ovarian Cancer Research Program of British Columbia. Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;210(5):471.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 24412119 (View on PubMed)

Erickson BK, Conner MG, Landen CN Jr. The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):409-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 23583217 (View on PubMed)

Kamran MW, Vaughan D, Crosby D, Wahab NA, Saadeh FA, Gleeson N. Opportunistic and interventional salpingectomy in women at risk: a strategy for preventing pelvic serous cancer (PSC). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):251-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.030. Epub 2013 Jul 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 23880597 (View on PubMed)

Rosenblatt KA, Thomas DB. Reduced risk of ovarian cancer in women with a tubal ligation or hysterectomy. The World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Nov;5(11):933-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 8922304 (View on PubMed)

Falconer H, Yin L, Gronberg H, Altman D. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan 27;107(2):dju410. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju410. Print 2015 Feb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 25628372 (View on PubMed)

Committee opinion no. 620: Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):279-281. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000459871.88564.09.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 25560145 (View on PubMed)

Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, Bergamini V, Zefiro F, Bolis P. Infectious morbidity after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: does concomitant salpingectomy make a difference? BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):589-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02085.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 19250369 (View on PubMed)

Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT, Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00669.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 18001455 (View on PubMed)

Morelli M, Venturella R, Mocciaro R, Di Cello A, Rania E, Lico D, D'Alessandro P, Zullo F. Prophylactic salpingectomy in premenopausal low-risk women for ovarian cancer: primum non nocere. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jun;129(3):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 23558052 (View on PubMed)

Findley AD, Siedhoff MT, Hobbs KA, Steege JF, Carey ET, McCall CA, Steiner AZ. Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1997. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 23993887 (View on PubMed)

Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 13;336(11):762-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703133361104.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

PMID: 9052654 (View on PubMed)

Koninger A, Kauth A, Schmidt B, Schmidt M, Yerlikaya G, Kasimir-Bauer S, Kimmig R, Birdir C. Anti-Mullerian-hormone levels during pregnancy and postpartum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Jul 11;11:60. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-60.

Reference Type RESULT

PMID: 23844593 (View on PubMed)

La Marca A, Giulini S, Orvieto R, De Leo V, Volpe A. Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations in maternal serum during pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jun;20(6):1569-72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh819. Epub 2005 Feb 25.

Reference Type RESULT

PMID: 15734752 (View on PubMed)

Ganer Herman H, Gluck O, Keidar R, Kerner R, Kovo M, Levran D, Bar J, Sagiv R. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):472.e1-472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

Reference Type DERIVED

PMID: 28455082 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0028-15-WOMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

Ovarian Reserve Following Bilateral Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Section

Study Results

Basic Information

Brief Summary

Detailed Description

Conditions

Keywords

Study Design

Study Groups

Bilateral salpingectomy

Bilateral salpingectomy

Tubal ligation

Tubal ligation

No intervention

Interventions

Bilateral salpingectomy

Tubal ligation

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Sponsors

Wolfson Medical Center

Responsible Party

Hadas Ganer Herman

References

Erickson BK, Conner MG, Landen CN Jr. The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):409-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

Kamran MW, Vaughan D, Crosby D, Wahab NA, Saadeh FA, Gleeson N. Opportunistic and interventional salpingectomy in women at risk: a strategy for preventing pelvic serous cancer (PSC). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):251-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.030. Epub 2013 Jul 21.

Rosenblatt KA, Thomas DB. Reduced risk of ovarian cancer in women with a tubal ligation or hysterectomy. The World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Nov;5(11):933-5.

Falconer H, Yin L, Gronberg H, Altman D. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan 27;107(2):dju410. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju410. Print 2015 Feb.

Committee opinion no. 620: Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):279-281. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000459871.88564.09.

Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, Bergamini V, Zefiro F, Bolis P. Infectious morbidity after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: does concomitant salpingectomy make a difference? BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):589-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02085.x.

Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT, Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00669.x.

Morelli M, Venturella R, Mocciaro R, Di Cello A, Rania E, Lico D, D'Alessandro P, Zullo F. Prophylactic salpingectomy in premenopausal low-risk women for ovarian cancer: primum non nocere. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jun;129(3):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 13;336(11):762-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703133361104.

Koninger A, Kauth A, Schmidt B, Schmidt M, Yerlikaya G, Kasimir-Bauer S, Kimmig R, Birdir C. Anti-Mullerian-hormone levels during pregnancy and postpartum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Jul 11;11:60. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-60.

La Marca A, Giulini S, Orvieto R, De Leo V, Volpe A. Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations in maternal serum during pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jun;20(6):1569-72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh819. Epub 2005 Feb 25.

Ganer Herman H, Gluck O, Keidar R, Kerner R, Kovo M, Levran D, Bar J, Sagiv R. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):472.e1-472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

Other Identifiers

0028-15-WOMC