Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
192 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-01-01
2023-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients over the age of 65 most often receive a bioprosthetic aortic valve during an isolated aortic valve replacement or in combination with another cardiac surgery, which may extend the operative time.
The Perceval bioprosthesis has the advantage to reduce operative time due to its automatic deployment on a stent, which shortens the suturing time compared to other bioprostheses that require more sutures (sutureless valve).
In this retrospective, single-center, observational descriptive study, the investigators are conducting a follow-up of 193 patients operated on at the Montpellier University Hospital between January 2012 and January 2023, who received a Perceval aortic valve as part of routine annual follow-up, in order to assess the durability of this valve based on clinical and echocardiographic Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT02673697
Comparison Between Three Types of Stented Pericardial Aortic Valves
NCT01522352
Clinical Data Collection on Perceval S Sutureless Prosthetic Aortic Valve in the Chinese Population
NCT06011148
Safety and Effectiveness Study of Perceval S Valve for Extended CE Mark
NCT01368666
Comparison of Sutureless Vs. Standard Biological Prostheses for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT03965065
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Perceval bioprosthesis explanted during the same surgical procedure. History of aortic root surgery.
Primary Endpoint :
\- Survival free from valve degeneration, according to VARC-3 criteria for structural or non-structural valve dysfunction.
Secondary endpoints :
* Freedom from aortic valve reintervention
* Freedom from SVD
* Freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation
* Freedom from stroke or transient ischemic attack
* Freedom from cardiac related rehospitalization
* Cardiac-specific mortality
Preoperative clinical data are collected via the DxCare electronic medical record system (including weight, height, medical history, and cardiovascular risk factors). Surgical data (type of procedure, operative time, outcomes at the end of surgery) are also extracted from the same software.
Follow-up Procedures :
Included patients are systematically scheduled for a cardiology follow-up consultation as part of routine annual postoperative care at the university hospital or in private practice. During this visit, they undergo a transthoracic echocardiography and a clinical assessment of their health status. These data are collected for analysis.
If patients are not followed up at the hospital and are considered lost to follow-up, their referring cardiologist will be contacted to obtain the most recent cardiological health data.
The annual follow-up echocardiography focuses on evaluating the hemodynamic parameters and durability of the bioprosthesis (presence or absence of pathological regurgitation, leaflet immobility, or thickening).
Clinical status is also assessed during the annual follow-up, including symptoms such as dyspnea, chest pain, and limitations in daily activities.
As part of standard follow-up, patients are contacted by phone and informed of the purpose of their scheduled visit to the Montpellier University Hospital.
For patients unable to attend an in-person consultation, a telephone interview is conducted to assess their clinical status, and their cardiologist is contacted to provide the most recent echocardiography report and clinical follow-up data. For patients who died before the beginning of the study, their trusted contact is approached to obtain clinical information regarding their medical history prior to death.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of aortic root surgery.
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
31. Fischlein T, Meuris B, Hakim-Meibodi K, Misfeld M, Carrel T, Zembala M, et al. The sutureless aortic valve at 1 year: A large multicenter cohort study. JTCVS. (2016) ; 151(6):1617-1626.e4. 32. Fischlein T, Meuris B, Folliguet T, Hakim-Meibodi K, Misfeld M, Carrel T, et al. Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study. JTCVS. (2022) ; 164(6):1772-1780.e11. 35. Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research. JACC. (2021) ; 77(21):2717-46.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-MTP_2023_07_202301441
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.