Perceval Aortic Bioprostheses : Durability Study.

NCT ID: NCT07116265

Last Updated: 2025-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

192 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aortic valve replacement is one of the most commonly performed procedures in adult cardiac surgery in France.

Patients over the age of 65 most often receive a bioprosthetic aortic valve during an isolated aortic valve replacement or in combination with another cardiac surgery, which may extend the operative time.

The Perceval bioprosthesis has the advantage to reduce operative time due to its automatic deployment on a stent, which shortens the suturing time compared to other bioprostheses that require more sutures (sutureless valve).

In this retrospective, single-center, observational descriptive study, the investigators are conducting a follow-up of 193 patients operated on at the Montpellier University Hospital between January 2012 and January 2023, who received a Perceval aortic valve as part of routine annual follow-up, in order to assess the durability of this valve based on clinical and echocardiographic Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Exclusion Criteria :

Perceval bioprosthesis explanted during the same surgical procedure. History of aortic root surgery.

Primary Endpoint :

\- Survival free from valve degeneration, according to VARC-3 criteria for structural or non-structural valve dysfunction.

Secondary endpoints :

* Freedom from aortic valve reintervention
* Freedom from SVD
* Freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation
* Freedom from stroke or transient ischemic attack
* Freedom from cardiac related rehospitalization
* Cardiac-specific mortality

Preoperative clinical data are collected via the DxCare electronic medical record system (including weight, height, medical history, and cardiovascular risk factors). Surgical data (type of procedure, operative time, outcomes at the end of surgery) are also extracted from the same software.

Follow-up Procedures :

Included patients are systematically scheduled for a cardiology follow-up consultation as part of routine annual postoperative care at the university hospital or in private practice. During this visit, they undergo a transthoracic echocardiography and a clinical assessment of their health status. These data are collected for analysis.

If patients are not followed up at the hospital and are considered lost to follow-up, their referring cardiologist will be contacted to obtain the most recent cardiological health data.

The annual follow-up echocardiography focuses on evaluating the hemodynamic parameters and durability of the bioprosthesis (presence or absence of pathological regurgitation, leaflet immobility, or thickening).

Clinical status is also assessed during the annual follow-up, including symptoms such as dyspnea, chest pain, and limitations in daily activities.

As part of standard follow-up, patients are contacted by phone and informed of the purpose of their scheduled visit to the Montpellier University Hospital.

For patients unable to attend an in-person consultation, a telephone interview is conducted to assess their clinical status, and their cardiologist is contacted to provide the most recent echocardiography report and clinical follow-up data. For patients who died before the beginning of the study, their trusted contact is approached to obtain clinical information regarding their medical history prior to death.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stenoses, Aortic Valve Aortic Insufficiency Aortic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with severe or non-severe aortic stenosis, symptomatic or asymptomatic, who received a rapidly deployed Perceval aortic bioprosthesis between January 1, 2012, and January 31, 2023, in the cardiac surgery department at Montpellier University Hospital.

Exclusion Criteria

* Perceval bioprosthesis explanted during the same surgical procedure.
* History of aortic root surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

31. Fischlein T, Meuris B, Hakim-Meibodi K, Misfeld M, Carrel T, Zembala M, et al. The sutureless aortic valve at 1 year: A large multicenter cohort study. JTCVS. (2016) ; 151(6):1617-1626.e4. 32. Fischlein T, Meuris B, Folliguet T, Hakim-Meibodi K, Misfeld M, Carrel T, et al. Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study. JTCVS. (2022) ; 164(6):1772-1780.e11. 35. Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research. JACC. (2021) ; 77(21):2717-46.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-MTP_2023_07_202301441

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.