Comparison of Two Pericardial Bioprostheses in AVR

NCT ID: NCT03796442

Last Updated: 2023-02-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-23

Study Completion Date

2022-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to compare early and 1-year hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement using two pericardial bioprosthesis, Avalus and Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This trial was designed as a multicenter randomized, controlled trial to recruit 386 patients who undergo aortic valve replacement with pericardial bioprosthesis. Patients were randomized by use of a randomization table. Bioprosthesis was chosen between Avalus or Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease according to the randomization result. The primary end point is postoperative 1-year transvalvular mean pressure gradient. The secondary end points are postoperative 1-year effective orifice area, operative mortality, operative morbidities, 1-year overall survival, 1-year freedom from cardiac death and 1-year freedom from valve-related events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AVALUS group

patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthesis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AVR with AVALUS

Intervention Type DEVICE

aortic valve replacement with AVALUS bioprosthesis

CEPME group

patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

AVR with CEPME

Intervention Type DEVICE

aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AVR with AVALUS

aortic valve replacement with AVALUS bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

AVR with CEPME

aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who are going to undergo aortic valve replacement with bioprosthesis

Exclusion Criteria

* heart failure with severe LV dysfunction (LV EF \<30%)
* active infective endocarditis
* with other critical cardiovascular disease (e.g. acute aortic dissection)
* with other critical comorbities by which the expected life span is less than 1 year
* inadequate participant by the researcher's discretion
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ho Young Hwang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ho Young Hwang, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Seongnam, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sohn SH, Kang Y, Kim JS, Choi JW, Lee JH, Kim JS, Lim C, Hwang HY. A Controlled Trial Comparing One-Year Hemodynamics of Two Bovine Pericardial Valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Mar;73(2):132-140. doi: 10.1055/a-2199-2087. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37884030 (View on PubMed)

Sohn SH, Kim JS, Choi JW, Lee JH, Kim JS, Lim C, Hwang HY. Preliminary Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Bovine Pericardial Valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Dec;71(8):648-655. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1753494. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35917824 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D-1812-024-991

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.