Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT ID: NCT02673697
Last Updated: 2024-03-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
914 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-22
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The trial has a flexible sample size that will be determined adaptively. The trial will enroll up to 1234 subjects, but accrual may stop earlier at approximately 900 or 1050 subjects These subjects will be enrolled at approximately 60 worldwide investigational sites where the device is commercially available The primary objective of this trial is to test the safety and efficacy of Perceval versus standard sutured stented bioprosthetic aortic valves among the intended trial population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Effectiveness Study of Perceval S Valve for Extended CE Mark
NCT01368666
Clinical Data Collection on Perceval S Sutureless Prosthetic Aortic Valve in the Chinese Population
NCT06011148
PERCEVAL S Valve Clinical Study for Chinese Registration
NCT03481387
Sizing of the PERCEVAL® Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis Using the CT: a Feasibility Study
NCT03667248
Perceval Aortic Bioprostheses : Durability Study.
NCT07116265
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The be part of the trial, investigational sites should have demonstrated experience with the implantation of the Perceval and able to implement the requirements of the study protocol.. All subjects with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis or steno-insufficiency who are candidates for surgical replacement of their native aortic valve according to established guidelines in current medical practice and as specified in the Perceval valve Instruction for Use (IFU) are the intended population for inclusion in this randomized trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Perceval
The Perceval sutureless aortic heart valve (Perceval valve) is a bioprosthesis manufactured with bovine pericardium and assembled on a Nitinol stent. The Perceval valve is designed to offer an alternative to surgically implanted flexible prostheses (stented and stentless biological valves). A special feature of the device is that it is self-anchoring and does not require sutures to be fixed to the implant site.
Perceval valve
Sutureless Aortic Biological Valve
other Stented biological valves
The comparator will be other commercially approved standard biological sutured stented valves, both bovine and porcine. The choice of the comparator tissue valve will be at the discretion of the participating investigators.
other stented biological valve
Any biological stented valves available on the market (Edwards, Medtronic, St.Jude, LivaNova, Labcor)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perceval valve
Sutureless Aortic Biological Valve
other stented biological valve
Any biological stented valves available on the market (Edwards, Medtronic, St.Jude, LivaNova, Labcor)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The subject has aortic valve disease that can be treated with a commercially available Perceval valve size, based on preoperative CT-scan.
3. The subject has:
1. critical aortic valve area defined as an initial aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index \< 0.6 cm2/m2 AND
2. Mean gradient \> 40 mmHg or Vmax \> 4 m/sec by resting echocardiogram or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization \[or with dobutamine stress, if subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<55%\] or velocity ratio \< 0.25;
4. The subject is symptomatic due to aortic stenosis with functional class of New York Heart Association (NYHA) II or higher.
5. The subject has signed the informed consent.
6. The subject is of legal minimum age.
7. The subject will be available for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.
Exclusion Criteria
2. The subject has aneurismal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall.
3. The subject is scheduled for concomitant procedures other than Coronary Aortic Bypass Graft (CABG), myectomy with or without aortic annulus enlargement
4. The subject has congenital bicuspid (i.e. Sievers type 0) or unicuspid aortic valve.
5. Anatomical structures not suitable for Perceval valve such as: aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter is \> 1.3.
6. The subject has a prosthetic heart valve in any position, including mitral valve repair.
7. The subject has a stroke or myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI) within 30 days prior to the planned valve implant surgery.
8. The subject has active endocarditis, myocarditis, or sepsis.
9. The subject is in cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output and needing hemodynamic support.
10. The subject is allergic to nickel alloys.
11. The subject is already included in another clinical trial that could confound the results of this clinical investigation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Corcym S.r.l
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Theodor Fischlein, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Klinikum Nurnberg, Nurnberg, Germany
Roberto Lorusso, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Valley Health System
Winchester, Virginia, United States
Klinische Abteilung fuer Herzchirurgie
Graz, , Austria
Medical University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, , Austria
Herzzentrum Hietzing
Vienna, , Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, , Austria
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Antwerp, , Belgium
Cliniques Univ. Saint-Luc
Brussels, , Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis
Leuven, , Belgium
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Southlake Regional Health Centre
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval
Québec, , Canada
Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran
Santiago, , Chile
CHU Angers
Angers, , France
C.H.U. de Besançon
Besançon, , France
Hôpital privé de Bois Bernard
Bois-Bernard, , France
Chru De Lille
Lille, , France
CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, , France
C.H.U. de Nancy
Nancy, , France
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, , Germany
Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik
Bad Neustadt an der Saale, , Germany
Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitätsklinik
Dresden, , Germany
ASKLEPIOS Klinikum Harburg
Hamburg, , Germany
University Heart Center Hamburg
Hamburg, , Germany
Medizinische Hochschule
Hanover, , Germany
Klinikum Nürnberg
Nuremberg, , Germany
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Jerusalem, , Israel
Sheba medical Center
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero
Brescia, BS, Italy
Centro Cuore Morgagni Pedara
Pedara, CT, Italy
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, MI, Italy
lstituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio e San Siro
Milan, MI, Italy
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio-Presidio Ospedaliero di Massa
Massa, MS, Italy
Spedali Civili
Brescia, , Italy
Maria Cecilia Hospital
Cotignola, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma
Mantova, , Italy
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
Maastricht University Hospital
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario De A Coruña
A Coruña, , Spain
Hospital University Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, , Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca
Murcia, , Spain
Victoria Hospital
Blackpool, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lorusso R, Folliguet T, Shrestha M, Meuris B, Kappetein AP, Roselli E, Klersy C, Nozza M, Verhees L, Larracas C, Goisis G, Fischlein T. Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;68(2):114-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675847. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
Fischlein T, Folliguet T, Meuris B, Shrestha ML, Roselli EE, McGlothlin A, Kappert U, Pfeiffer S, Corbi P, Lorusso R; Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve Replacement Investigators. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):920-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.162. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
Lorusso R, Ravaux JM, Pollari F, Folliguet TA, Kappert U, Meuris B, Shrestha ML, Roselli EE, Bonaros N, Fabre O, Corbi P, Troise G, Andreas M, Pinaud F, Pfeiffer S, Kueri S, Tan E, Voisine P, Girdauskas E, Rega F, Garcia-Puente J, Fischlein T; on behalf the PERSIST-AVR Investigators. Pacemaker implantation after sutureless or stented valve: results from a controlled randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 2;62(4):ezac164. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac164.
Lorusso R, Jiritano F, Roselli E, Shrestha M, Folliguet T, Meuris B, Pollari F, Fischlein T; PERSIST-AVR Investigators. Perioperative platelet reduction after sutureless or stented valve implantation: results from the PERSIST-AVR controlled randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 1;60(6):1359-1365. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab175.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TPS003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.