Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve Replacement

NCT ID: NCT02673697

Last Updated: 2024-03-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

914 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-22

Study Completion Date

2020-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, randomized, stratified non blinded multi-center, international, post market trial assessed in a non-inferiority study.

The trial has a flexible sample size that will be determined adaptively. The trial will enroll up to 1234 subjects, but accrual may stop earlier at approximately 900 or 1050 subjects These subjects will be enrolled at approximately 60 worldwide investigational sites where the device is commercially available The primary objective of this trial is to test the safety and efficacy of Perceval versus standard sutured stented bioprosthetic aortic valves among the intended trial population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PERSIST-AVR is designed to collect data on sutureless valve (Perceval sutureless aortic heart valve), a new type of biological aortic valve, comparing data with standard biological aortic valve, considered the gold standard for aortic valve replacement. This prospective, randomized international multicenter study is planned to demonstrate, as primary endpoint, the non inferiority of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular (MACCE) events at one year while showing superiority in resource consumptions at hospital discharge in patients treated with Perceval valve when compared to standard aortic valve replacement. The study is planned to cover the lack of prospective, randomized comparison data between sutureless valve and standard aortic biological sutured valve. The trial has a flexible sample size that will be determined adaptively. The trial will enroll up to 1234 subjects, but accrual may stop earlier at approximately 900 or 1050 subjects. These subjects will be enrolled at approximately 60 worldwide investigational sites where the device is commercially available. The primary endpoint will be reached at 1 year FU and, consequently, the planned primary analysis will be performed 12 months following the end of accrual.

The be part of the trial, investigational sites should have demonstrated experience with the implantation of the Perceval and able to implement the requirements of the study protocol.. All subjects with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis or steno-insufficiency who are candidates for surgical replacement of their native aortic valve according to established guidelines in current medical practice and as specified in the Perceval valve Instruction for Use (IFU) are the intended population for inclusion in this randomized trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Disease Aortic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Perceval

The Perceval sutureless aortic heart valve (Perceval valve) is a bioprosthesis manufactured with bovine pericardium and assembled on a Nitinol stent. The Perceval valve is designed to offer an alternative to surgically implanted flexible prostheses (stented and stentless biological valves). A special feature of the device is that it is self-anchoring and does not require sutures to be fixed to the implant site.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Perceval valve

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sutureless Aortic Biological Valve

other Stented biological valves

The comparator will be other commercially approved standard biological sutured stented valves, both bovine and porcine. The choice of the comparator tissue valve will be at the discretion of the participating investigators.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

other stented biological valve

Intervention Type DEVICE

Any biological stented valves available on the market (Edwards, Medtronic, St.Jude, LivaNova, Labcor)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Perceval valve

Sutureless Aortic Biological Valve

Intervention Type DEVICE

other stented biological valve

Any biological stented valves available on the market (Edwards, Medtronic, St.Jude, LivaNova, Labcor)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The subject has an indication for treatment by valve replacement with a bioprosthesis according to the IFU, through either full sternotomy or mini-sternotomy.
2. The subject has aortic valve disease that can be treated with a commercially available Perceval valve size, based on preoperative CT-scan.
3. The subject has:

1. critical aortic valve area defined as an initial aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index \< 0.6 cm2/m2 AND
2. Mean gradient \> 40 mmHg or Vmax \> 4 m/sec by resting echocardiogram or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization \[or with dobutamine stress, if subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<55%\] or velocity ratio \< 0.25;
4. The subject is symptomatic due to aortic stenosis with functional class of New York Heart Association (NYHA) II or higher.
5. The subject has signed the informed consent.
6. The subject is of legal minimum age.
7. The subject will be available for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The subject has a contraindication for treatment by the Perceval valve or by a bioprosthetic aortic valve as stated in the IFU.
2. The subject has aneurismal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall.
3. The subject is scheduled for concomitant procedures other than Coronary Aortic Bypass Graft (CABG), myectomy with or without aortic annulus enlargement
4. The subject has congenital bicuspid (i.e. Sievers type 0) or unicuspid aortic valve.
5. Anatomical structures not suitable for Perceval valve such as: aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter is \> 1.3.
6. The subject has a prosthetic heart valve in any position, including mitral valve repair.
7. The subject has a stroke or myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI) within 30 days prior to the planned valve implant surgery.
8. The subject has active endocarditis, myocarditis, or sepsis.
9. The subject is in cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output and needing hemodynamic support.
10. The subject is allergic to nickel alloys.
11. The subject is already included in another clinical trial that could confound the results of this clinical investigation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Corcym S.r.l

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Theodor Fischlein, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinikum Nurnberg, Nurnberg, Germany

Roberto Lorusso, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Maine Medical Center

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Valley Health System

Winchester, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Klinische Abteilung fuer Herzchirurgie

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Medical University of Innsbruck

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Herzzentrum Hietzing

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Cliniques Univ. Saint-Luc

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Southlake Regional Health Centre

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

C.H.U. de Besançon

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Hôpital privé de Bois Bernard

Bois-Bernard, , France

Site Status

Chru De Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

C.H.U. de Nancy

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU de Poitiers

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen

Bad Krozingen, , Germany

Site Status

Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik

Bad Neustadt an der Saale, , Germany

Site Status

Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitätsklinik

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

ASKLEPIOS Klinikum Harburg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

University Heart Center Hamburg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Nürnberg

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Sheba medical Center

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero

Brescia, BS, Italy

Site Status

Centro Cuore Morgagni Pedara

Pedara, CT, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale San Raffaele

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

lstituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio e San Siro

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio-Presidio Ospedaliero di Massa

Massa, MS, Italy

Site Status

Spedali Civili

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Maria Cecilia Hospital

Cotignola, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma

Mantova, , Italy

Site Status

Catharina Ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht University Hospital

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario De A Coruña

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital University Germans Trias I Pujol

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Victoria Hospital

Blackpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Belgium Canada Chile France Germany Israel Italy Netherlands Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lorusso R, Folliguet T, Shrestha M, Meuris B, Kappetein AP, Roselli E, Klersy C, Nozza M, Verhees L, Larracas C, Goisis G, Fischlein T. Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;68(2):114-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675847. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30497085 (View on PubMed)

Fischlein T, Folliguet T, Meuris B, Shrestha ML, Roselli EE, McGlothlin A, Kappert U, Pfeiffer S, Corbi P, Lorusso R; Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve Replacement Investigators. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):920-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.162. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33478837 (View on PubMed)

Lorusso R, Ravaux JM, Pollari F, Folliguet TA, Kappert U, Meuris B, Shrestha ML, Roselli EE, Bonaros N, Fabre O, Corbi P, Troise G, Andreas M, Pinaud F, Pfeiffer S, Kueri S, Tan E, Voisine P, Girdauskas E, Rega F, Garcia-Puente J, Fischlein T; on behalf the PERSIST-AVR Investigators. Pacemaker implantation after sutureless or stented valve: results from a controlled randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 2;62(4):ezac164. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac164.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35290444 (View on PubMed)

Lorusso R, Jiritano F, Roselli E, Shrestha M, Folliguet T, Meuris B, Pollari F, Fischlein T; PERSIST-AVR Investigators. Perioperative platelet reduction after sutureless or stented valve implantation: results from the PERSIST-AVR controlled randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 1;60(6):1359-1365. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab175.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34118150 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TPS003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Inspiris Resilia Durability Registry
NCT03666741 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING