Comparison Between Carbapenems and Noncarbapenem Beta-lactam Antibiotics in Septic Burn Patients

NCT ID: NCT07096310

Last Updated: 2025-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this work is to evaluate the efficacy associated with Meropenem(example of carbapenems) as initial therapy for sepsis in burn patients compared with Pipracillin/Tazobactam (example of non carbapenem beta lactam antibiotics).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As causative pathogens are not usually identified at the time of initiating antibiotics in sepsis in burn patients, carbapenems are commonly used as an initial treatment. To reduce indiscriminate use of carbapenems, the efficacy of alternative empiric regimens, such as piperacillin-tazobactam and the fourth-generation cephalosporins, should be elucidated. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy of Meropenem and piperacillin tazobactam as an initial therapy of sepsis in burn patients .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

each drug will be given to every group according to dose according to Patient weight per KG
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Meronem group

Meronem group will receive Meronem 2 gm Iv infusion over 3 hours every 8 hours per day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Meropenem I.V. 2g as a 3 hour infusion every 8 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Tazocin group

Tazocin group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tazocin (pipercillin/tazobactam)

Intervention Type DRUG

Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meropenem I.V. 2g as a 3 hour infusion every 8 hours

Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Intervention Type DRUG

Tazocin (pipercillin/tazobactam)

Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Meronem Zocin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Burned patients admitted to Burn Unit of Ain Shams university hospitals diagnosed with sepsis, not transferred from other hospitals, Age group between 21 - 60 years old, ASA I and II.

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of participation in the study,
* Patient with no signs of sepsis,
* Patients who died within 24 hours after admission,
* Patients concomitantly received carbapenems and other broad-spectrum beta-lactams,
* Data from the second and subsequent hospitalizations of patients who were hospitalized multiple times during the study period and used only the data from the first hospitalization,
* Patients younger than 21 years old and older than 60 years old.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ramy Mohamed Mohamed Abdelfattah

assistant lecturer of anesthesia and ICU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed A Ali, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ain Shams University

Osama R Abdelmalek, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ain Shams University

Thabet A Botros, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ain Shams University

Aya A Bayoumy, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ain Sham University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams University Hospitals

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rhodes NJ, Wagner JL, Davis SL, Bosso JA, Goff DA, Rybak MJ, Scheetz MH; MAD-ID Research Network. Trends in and Predictors of Carbapenem Consumption across North American Hospitals: Results from a Multicenter Survey by the MAD-ID Research Network. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7):e00327-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00327-19. Print 2019 Jul.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31061154 (View on PubMed)

Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, Allegranzi B, Reinhart K. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1552-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32572531 (View on PubMed)

Ibrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest. 2000 Jul;118(1):146-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.146.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10893372 (View on PubMed)

Umemura Y, Yamakawa K, Tanaka Y, Yoshimura J, Ogura H, Fujimi S. Efficacy of Carbapenems Compared With Noncarbapenem Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as Initial Antibiotic Therapy Against Sepsis: A Nationwide Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;51(9):1210-1221. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005932. Epub 2023 May 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37232855 (View on PubMed)

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34599691 (View on PubMed)

Abe T, Ogura H, Shiraishi A, Kushimoto S, Saitoh D, Fujishima S, Mayumi T, Shiino Y, Nakada TA, Tarui T, Hifumi T, Otomo Y, Okamoto K, Umemura Y, Kotani J, Sakamoto Y, Sasaki J, Shiraishi SI, Takuma K, Tsuruta R, Hagiwara A, Yamakawa K, Masuno T, Takeyama N, Yamashita N, Ikeda H, Ueyama M, Fujimi S, Gando S; JAAM FORECAST group. Characteristics, management, and in-hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis in intensive care units in Japan: the FORECAST study. Crit Care. 2018 Nov 22;22(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2186-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30466493 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU MD326/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Metformin and Lactoferrin in Sepsis in Icu
NCT06181422 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3