A Study of Meropenem Standard 30 Minute Infusion Versus Prolonged 3 Hour Infusion in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients
NCT ID: NCT00891423
Last Updated: 2015-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2010-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Adult (age 18 years or older) patients in intensive care who have a serious infection being treated with the antibiotic, meropenem for three days or more will be able to participate in this study. The decision to start meropenem will be made by the intensive care doctors and they will give it in the usual way for 24 hours.
The investigators will then in a random way (like tossing of a coin), give the participant meropenem either in the usual way (1 gram infused over 30 minutes) or give them a smaller amount, but over a longer period of time (500 milligrams infused over 3 hours). This will be done for 24 hours. They will then receive meropenem in the alternative way for another 24 hours. After this time the intensive care doctors will decide how meropenem will continue to be given.
Blood levels of meropenem will be measured to see if they are the same when meropenem is given in each of the two different ways. During each different way of giving meropenem, 7 blood samples will need to be taken. Ten mls (or one spoonful) of blood will be required for each measurement. Blood levels will be taken through monitoring lines, which will be already present.
Other information will also be collected about the participant during this study. This will include their age, gender, height, weight, information about what other medical conditions they have and measurements of how well their kidneys are functioning.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem in Severe Septic Patients
NCT03645668
Empiric Antibiotic Treatment for Septic Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT05924126
A Pharmacokinetics Study of Meropenem and Piperacillin in Patients With Sepsis
NCT05807217
Short-course Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis
NCT02899143
Meropenem and Ciprofloxacin Dosing in Septic Shock
NCT02240277
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current standard of care in Austin ICU is to give meropenem 1g via short (30 min) infusion. Small studies of healthy volunteers and intensive care patients and Monte Carlo simulation modelling in these groups, have shown that prolonged infusions of meropenem can provide at least equivalent T \> MIC while using a smaller dose. Studies in intensive care patients have generally excluded those with renal failure, septic shock and certain other co-morbidities. Therefore, a study encompassing all groups of patients who receive meropenem in the intensive care setting is required to show if these findings have more generalised applicability.
Hypothesis/research questions:
500mg of meropenem administered as a 3 hour infusion is at least comparable to more traditional dosing of 1 g administered as a 30 minute infusion, in attaining target time above MIC.
We plan to compare standard meropenem therapy (1g over 30 minute infusion) with prolonged infusion meropenem (500mg over 3 hour infusion) in a general intensive care unit. Meropenem levels will be monitored by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis (Victorian College of Pharmacy) to determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes of the different dosing regimens and will be correlated with the meropenem MIC of any significant bacterial isolates from the patients
The outcomes of this pilot study will help plan a larger project to improve the use of meropenem in intensive care unit patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Meropenem short infusion
Meropenem 1g infused over 30 minutes
* every 8 hours if calculated CrCL greater than or equal to 50 mL/min OR
* every 12 hours if calculated CrCL less than 50 mL/min or hemofiltration
Meropenem short infusion
Meropenem extended infusion
Meropenem 500mg infused over 3 hours
* every 8 hours if calculated CrCL greater than or equal to 50 mL/min OR
* every 12 hours if calculated CrCL less than 50 mL/min or hemofiltration
Meropenem extended infusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Meropenem short infusion
Meropenem extended infusion
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Predicted duration of treatment 3 days or more
Exclusion Criteria
* Hypersensitivity to meropenem or other beta-lactams
* Consent unable to be obtained by participant or next of kin
* Suspected or proven bacterial meningitis
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Austin Health
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Katherine Langan
Infectious diseases registrar
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul JOHNSON
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Austin Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Austin Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACTRN
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
H2008/03406
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.