CRP Versus PCT as Bio-markers for Sepsis and in Guiding Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT04049565

Last Updated: 2020-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-01

Study Completion Date

2019-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sepsis is a life threatening organ dysfunction caused by infection. Severe sepsis is expected to rise due to resistance to antibiotics. Inappropriate use of antibiotics in the ICU leads to adverse drug reaction and bacterial resistance. Using biomarkers for infection as PCT and CRP are useful in diagnosing infection and duration of therapy. CRP based protocol will be compared to PCT based protocol for reducing the length of stay and reduction of antibiotic use in critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sepsis is a syndrome of physiologic, pathologic, and biochemical abnormalities induced by infection. It is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It is a major public health concern, accounting for more than $20 billion (5.2%) of total US hospital costs in 2011. Not only is sepsis expensive and prevalent, but it is a major cause of mortality and critical illness worldwide. Moreover, cases of severe sepsis are expected to rise in the future for several reasons, including: Increased awareness and sensitivity for the diagnosis; increasing numbers of immunocompromised patients; wider use of invasive procedures; more resistant microorganisms; and old aging population.

Use of appropriate antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a major challenge. Studies have shown that up to 50% of antibiotics prescribed in hospital settings are either unnecessary or inappropriate, contributing to increasing rates of resistant organisms, increases in adverse drug reactions, overall length of stay (LOS) and mortality. In addition, in critically ill patients, a long duration of treatment with antibiotics is associated with the development of antimicrobial resistance. Moreover, Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) SIRS can closely mimic one another and present a diagnostic challenge. So, determination of the presence or absence of bacterial infection is important to guide appropriate therapy and reduce antibiotic exposure. For microorganism detection, culture sensitivity is used though it has some drawbacks as time consuming, sometimes misleading with negative or positive reports and also they don't give information about the onset of organ dysfunction. Accordingly, it is important to differentiate culture negative sepsis patients from those with noninfectious SIRS, as these disease conditions require different therapeutic regimens. Due to these drawbacks of culture, researchers tried to depend on other more specific blood markers.

Biomarkers of infection, namely C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT) have been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of infection as well as in the assessment of its response to antibiotic therapy. C-reactive protein variations overtime appears to have a good performance for the diagnosis of infection. Procalcitonin shows a better correlation with clinical severity.

Despite being used routinely in several intensive care services as an auxiliary criterion for decisions regarding antibiotic therapy, no C- reactive protein based protocol has been tested in clinical trials to guide the reduction of antibiotic use in patients with sepsis until 2012. In 2013 Oliveira et al. compared a protocol based on serum PCT levels versus a protocol based on serum C-reactive protein levels for reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock. The latter study showed that C-reactive protein was as useful as procalcitonin in reducing antibiotic use in a predominantly medical population of septic patients, causing no apparent harm.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Morality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Procalcitonin

septic patients who will receive Procalcitonin

Procalcitonin biomarker and CRP biomarker

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

collecting blood samples to measure serum CRP and Procalcitonin

C-Reactive Protein

septic patients who will receive C-Reactive ptotein

Procalcitonin biomarker and CRP biomarker

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

collecting blood samples to measure serum CRP and Procalcitonin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Procalcitonin biomarker and CRP biomarker

collecting blood samples to measure serum CRP and Procalcitonin

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>18 and less than 70
* Patients with sepsis or septic shock who received their first doses of antibiotics no longer than 24 h before inclusion into the study

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Elderly (defined as older than 70).
* Pregnancy and lactation
* Immunocompromised patients or who had high doses of corticosteroids
* Patients with chronic organ failure
* Infections that required long-term treatment, regardless of the etiologic agent (e.g., bacterial endocarditis).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beni-Suef University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Walid Ahmed Ali

Clinical Pharmacist / Walid Ahmed Ali Abdeltawab

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abdelrahman Dr ElNaggar, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

study official is dead

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University Hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PCTCRP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.