Empirical Meropenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Adult Patients With Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT06184659

Last Updated: 2025-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

5800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-26

Study Completion Date

2029-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The EMPRESS trial aims to test the two most commonly used antibiotics (meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam) among intensive care patients with sepsis (blood poisoning), as the safety of these two drugs is unclear in this group of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem are commonly used as empirical agents for patients with sepsis or septic shock. In a recent systematic review comparing empirical and/or definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem for patients with severe bacterial infections, including sepsis and septic shock, it was shown that piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with less favourable outcomes based on low or very low certainty of evidence. At present, it is unclear if piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem are equally effective and safe for adults with sepsis.

Objectives To assess the effects of empirical meropenem vs. piperacillin/tazobactam on mortality and other patient-important outcomes in critically ill adults with sepsis.

Design Investigator-initiated, international, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, adaptive clinical trial with an integrated feasibility phase. The EMPRESS trial will employ adaptive stopping rules to increase the chance that the trial will be conclusive and response-adaptive randomisation to increase each participant's chance of being randomised to the superior intervention arm.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria We will screen all adult patients who are critically ill with sepsis and who have indication for empirical treatment with meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam. We will exclude patients with preceding intravenous treatment with meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam for 24 hours or more; known pregnancy; known hypersensitivity or allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics; suspected or documented central nervous system infection; known infection or colonialisation with microorganism with acquired resistance to meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam; current use of valproate; co-enrolment in other interventional trial where protocols collide; previous randomisation in EMPRESS; informed consent following inclusion expected to be unobtainable; and patients who are under coercive measures.

Experimental intervention IV meropenem 1 g three times daily for up to 30 days.

Control intervention IV piperacillin/tazobactam 4/0.5 g four times daily for up to 30 days.

Outcomes The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 30 days after randomisation. The secondary outcomes are the occurrence at least one serious adverse reaction (i.e., anaphylactic reaction to IV piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem, invasive fungal infection, pseudomembranous colitis, or toxic epidermal necrolysis) within 30 days of randomisation; the occurrence of new isolation precautions due to resistant bacteria within 30 days of randomisation; days alive without life support (i.e., invasive mechanical ventilation, circulatory support, or renal replacement therapy) from randomisation to day 30 and 90; days alive and out of hospital from randomisation to day 30 and 90; all-cause mortality at day 90 and 180; and health-related quality of life at day 180 using EQ-5D-5L index values and EQ VAS. The feasibility outcomes are time to completion of feasibility phase (i.e., 200 participants randomised), recruitment proportion, proportion of participants without consent to the use of data, protocol adherence, and retention proportion.

Statistics and stopping rules The trial will be analysed using Bayesian statistical methods with the primary analyses conducted in the intention-to-treat population. Outcomes will be analysed using logistic and linear regression models adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics and neutral and weakly informative to somewhat sceptical priors. Results will be presented as adjusted sample average treatment effects using both absolute (risk and mean differences) and relative (risk ratios and ratios of means) differences with 95% credible intervals and probabilities of benefit/harm. Adaptive analyses will start after follow-up and data collection concludes for 400 participants and every subsequent 300 participants up to a maximum of 14,000 participants. Adaptations will be based on data for the primary outcome. EMPRESS will use constant, symmetrical stopping rules for inferiority/superiority calibrated to keep the type 1 error rate at 5%. Further, the trial will be stopped for practical equivalence if there is 90% probability that the absolute risk difference between arms is less than 2.5%-points. Restricted response-adaptive randomisation will be used to ensure minimum allocation probabilities of 40% to both groups.

Missing data will be imputed, and relevant secondary analyses, sensitivity analyses, and analyses of heterogeneity in treatment effects according to pre-defined baseline characteristics will be undertaken once the trial has been stopped.

Trial design performance metrics Performance characteristics were evaluated assuming a 25% event probability for the primary outcome in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm and scenarios with no, small, and large differences corresponding to event probabilities of 25%, 22.5%, and 20% in the meropenem arm, respectively. The expected (mean) sample sizes under these scenarios are 5189, 5859, and 2570, respectively. The probabilities of conclusiveness (i.e., superiority or equivalence) are 99% in all scenarios, and the probabilities of superiority (power) are 72% and \& 99% in the small and large difference scenarios, respectively.

Estimated timeline

* Primo 2024: authority approvals and first participant randomised
* Primo 2025: feasibility phase analysis concluded
* Medio 2028: expected inclusion of the last participant if trial continues to the expected sample size in the small-difference scenario (i.e., the largest expected sample size under the three different scenarios assessed) (section 19.9)
* Medio 2032: expected inclusion of the last participant if the trial continues to the maximum sample size (n=14,000) (section 19.9)
* Approximately 3 months after inclusion of the last participant: primary report on 30-day outcomes submitted
* Approximately 6 months after inclusion of the last participant: report on 90-day outcomes submitted
* Approximately 9 months after inclusion of the last participant: report on 180-day outcomes submitted

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Meropenem

Participants in the experimental intervention arm will receive 1 g of IV meropenem three times daily administered according to usual clinical practice (i.e., intermittent-, prolonged-, or continuous infusion) until discharge from the participating site, death, or termination of empirical antibiotic therapy (including initiation of definitive treatment).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meropenem

Intervention Type DRUG

For meropenem, the standard dose is 1 g administered 3 times daily as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion, and the high dose is 2 g administered 3 times daily by extended 3-hour infusion

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Participants in the control arm will receive 4/0.5 g of intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam four times daily administered according to usual clinical practice (i.e., intermittent-, prolonged-, or continuous infusion) until discharge from the participating site, death, or termination of empirical antibiotic therapy (including initiation of definitive treatment).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard dose of piperacillin/tazobactam 4/0.5 g administered 4 times daily as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion or 3 times daily by extended 4-hour infusions and the recommended high dose is 4/0.5 g administered 4 times daily by extended 3-hour infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meropenem

For meropenem, the standard dose is 1 g administered 3 times daily as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion, and the high dose is 2 g administered 3 times daily by extended 3-hour infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Standard dose of piperacillin/tazobactam 4/0.5 g administered 4 times daily as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion or 3 times daily by extended 4-hour infusions and the recommended high dose is 4/0.5 g administered 4 times daily by extended 3-hour infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Sepsis (including septic shock) defined according to the Sepsis-3 criteria (1), i.e., suspected or documented infection and an acute increase of ≥ 2 points in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (a marker of acute organ dysfunction)
* Critical illness defined as use of at least one of the following:

1. Invasive mechanical ventilation
2. Non-invasive ventilation
3. Continuous use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for hypoxia
4. Oxygen supplementation with an oxygen flow of ≥ 10 litres (L)/minute independent of delivery system and total flows
5. Continuous infusion of any vasopressor or inotrope (excluding strictly procedure-related infusions)
* Clinical indication for empirical treatment with either meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam

Exclusion Criteria

* Preceding intravenous treatment with meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam for \> 24 hours prior to screening
* Fertile women \< 60 years of age with known pregnancy or positive urine human gonadotropin (hCG) or plasma hCG
* Known hypersensitivity or allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics
* Suspected or documented central nervous system infection
* Known infection/colonialization with microorganism with acquired resistance against meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam within the previous 3 months (e.g., ESBL-, AmpC- or carbapenemase-producing bacteria)
* Current or planned use of valproate within 30 days from randomisation
* Patient included in another interventional trial where co-enrolment with EMPRESS is not permitted
* Previously randomised into the EMPRESS trial
* Informed consent following inclusion expected to be unobtainable
* Patient under coercive measures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, København Ø, Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Morten H Møller, MD, Professor, PhD

Role: CONTACT

4535458685

Nick Meier, MD

Role: CONTACT

4535450606

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Morten H Moeller, MD, Professor, PhD

Role: primary

4535458685

Nick Meier, MD

Role: backup

4535450606

Morten H Møller, Professor

Role: primary

+4535450606

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-509703-33-00

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RH-ITA-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Aminoglycosides in Early Sepsis
NCT06712641 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4