Short-Term Atrial Pacing and Hemodynamics After Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07082283

Last Updated: 2025-08-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-04

Study Completion Date

2026-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether temporary atrial pacing improves heart function after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). It will also help determine the best pacing rate during the first 24 hours after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does atrial pacing improve cardiac output after surgery?
* Is 70, 80, or 90 bpm the most effective pacing rate?
* Does pacing reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation after surgery?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) frequently leads to immediate postoperative rhythm or conduction disturbances, especially atrial fibrillation or atrioventricular block (AV Block), along with hemodynamic instability and transient reduction in cardiac output due to myocardial contractility impairment.

Temporary pacing wires are placed in the operating room and have been used since the 1960s to manage cardiac conduction disorders in these patients, allowing for atrial (AAI) or dual-chamber (DDD) pacing if necessary. Atrial pacing, by restoring synchronized atrial contraction with ventricular filling, helps maintain optimal cardiac output.

Cardiac output is defined as the product of heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV). To optimize cardiac output, increasing heart rate is possible, hence the need for atrial pacing.

A pacing rate slightly higher than spontaneous sinus rhythm appears to prevent pauses, limit rhythm instability, and reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation. However, the optimal pacing rate postoperatively has not been clearly defined, and data comparing different rates (70, 80, or 90 bpm) are scarce.

In our center, postoperative atrial pacing is nearly routine and commonly set at 90 bpm, a rate we consider optimal due to its alignment with the Frank-Starling curve. This rate maximizes venous return and stroke volume, thereby optimizing postoperative cardiac output.

Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that routine postoperative temporary pacing wire insertion may not always be necessary and should be reserved for patients identified as high-risk for postoperative rhythm disturbances.

Nowadays, in many international centers, the absence of routine temporary pacing has become the norm. Although 90 bpm is theoretically the optimal rate for atrial pacing, important questions remain: Is postoperative pacing absolutely necessary? If so, could a rate lower than 90 bpm suffice to maintain adequate hemodynamic profile (HDP)?

This study aims at determining whether routine temporary pacing is necessary during the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery under CPB, and what the optimal pacing rate is (AAI or DDD: 70 bpm vs. 80 bpm vs. 90 bpm) in terms of its impact on the HDP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Output

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomized, controlled, comparative, single-center study
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pacing Group

Patients in this group receive continuous atrial pacing at 90 bpm during the first 24 postoperative hours (outside of evaluation sequences).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Pacing Protocol for Pacing Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

At four standardized time points (H0: arrival in the ICU, H6, H12, H24), a transient pacing sequence at 70, 80, and 90 bpm is conducted, with each rate applied for 10 minutes to allow stabilization, followed by recording of the hemodynamic profile and blood pressure, as follows:

* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm between 50 and 69 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 70 bpm, 80 bpm, and finally 90 bpm
* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm between 70 and 79 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 80 bpm, and finally at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm between 80 and 89 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm ≥ 90 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate only

Non-Pacing Group

Patients in this group remain in their spontaneous sinus rhythm outside of the evaluation sequences.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pacing Protocol for Non-pacing Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

At H0, H6, H12, and H24, they will undergo transient pacing at 70, 80, and 90 bpm, following the same measurement protocol (10 minutes per rate), followed by recording of the hemodynamic profile and blood pressure, as follows:

* If the patient has a rhythm between 50 and 69 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 70 bpm, 80 bpm, and finally 90 bpm
* If the patient has a rhythm between 70 and 79 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 80 bpm, and finally at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a rhythm between 80 and 89 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a rhythm ≥ 90 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate only

Outside the pacing periods at different rates, patients in the non-pacing group will remain on their spontaneous sinus rhythm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pacing Protocol for Pacing Group

At four standardized time points (H0: arrival in the ICU, H6, H12, H24), a transient pacing sequence at 70, 80, and 90 bpm is conducted, with each rate applied for 10 minutes to allow stabilization, followed by recording of the hemodynamic profile and blood pressure, as follows:

* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm between 50 and 69 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 70 bpm, 80 bpm, and finally 90 bpm
* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm between 70 and 79 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 80 bpm, and finally at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm between 80 and 89 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a spontaneous rhythm ≥ 90 bpm, measurements are taken at the spontaneous rate only

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pacing Protocol for Non-pacing Group

At H0, H6, H12, and H24, they will undergo transient pacing at 70, 80, and 90 bpm, following the same measurement protocol (10 minutes per rate), followed by recording of the hemodynamic profile and blood pressure, as follows:

* If the patient has a rhythm between 50 and 69 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 70 bpm, 80 bpm, and finally 90 bpm
* If the patient has a rhythm between 70 and 79 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 80 bpm, and finally at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a rhythm between 80 and 89 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate, then at 90 bpm
* If the patient has a rhythm ≥ 90 bpm, measurements will be taken at the spontaneous rate only

Outside the pacing periods at different rates, patients in the non-pacing group will remain on their spontaneous sinus rhythm.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 years or older
* Cardiac surgery under CPB (coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement or repair, or combined procedures)
* Placement of epicardial atrioventricular pacing wires during surgery
* Placement of a Swan-Ganz catheter intraoperatively
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency surgery
* Patients with an internal pacemaker
* History of permanent atrial fibrillation
* Complete atrioventricular block upon weaning from CPB
* Junctional rhythm upon weaning from CPB
* Sinus rhythm \< 50 bpm upon weaning from CPB
* Failure of atrial or dual-chamber pacing (patients paced in ventricular mode VVI)
* Contraindication to Swan-Ganz catheter placement
* Hemodynamic instability defined by significant bleeding or tamponade requiring surgical re-intervention, or the need for escalating doses of vasopressors (Norepinephrine \> 1 μg/kg/min, Dobutamine \> 10 μg/kg/min)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saint-Joseph University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joanna Tohme

MD, MSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Samia Jebara

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Saint Joseph University of Beirut

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital

Beirut, , Lebanon

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Lebanon

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rhea Mattar

Role: CONTACT

+96171464840

Joanna Tohme

Role: CONTACT

+96170492735

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rhea Mattar

Role: primary

+96171464840

Joanna Tohme

Role: backup

+96170492735

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEHDF-2702

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.