Accelerated Pacing in Patients Undergoing Pace-and-ablate Strategy With LBBAP: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

NCT ID: NCT06377046

Last Updated: 2024-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-31

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effect of accelerated pacing (pacemaker lower rate programmed to 80bpm) compared to pacing at the standard programmed lower rate of 60bpm in symptomatic atrial fibrillation patients undergoing pace-and-ablate strategy with LBBAP.

The main question it aims to answer is:

\- To determine the effect of accelerated pacing on health-related quality of life compared to the current standard of care.

Secondary questions it aims to answer are:

* To study the acute hemodynamic effect of different (accelerated) pacing rates on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac output and arterial blood pressure among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing pace-and-ablate strategy.
* To study the long-term effects (at 6 months) of accelerated pacing compared to the current standard of care among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing pace-and-ablate strategy on:
* NT pro BNP levels
* device detected atrial fibrillation burden and daily activity
* echocardiographic measurements (LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD, left ventricular end- diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LAVI left atrial volume index; diastolic parameters; strain

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale:

Permanent pacemaker implantation combined with atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) reduces symptoms and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). A high percentage of conventional right ventricular pacing increases the risk for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, a risk which is presumably minimised by a form of conduction system pacing, termed left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). LBBAP attempts to recreate the normal physiologic activation of the heart through stimulation of the heart's own natural conduction system, thereby maintaining ventricular synchrony. This strategy may be particularly important in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a diagnosis that frequently coexists with AF. The long-term programming of a patient undergoing a "pace-and-ablate strategy" (pacemaker implantation and AVNA), is such that the lower rate of the pacemaker is routinely set to 60 bpm. Previous studies have shown that accelerated pacing (ie. programming the pacemaker to a lower rate of 80bpm) may improve HRQoL in a subset of patients with HFpEF. It is therefore hypothesized that accelerated pacing will improve HRQoL in patients with symptomatic AF undergoing a pace and ablate strategy, when compared to pacing at 60 bpm, which is standard of care.

Objective:

Primary objective: To determine the effect of accelerated pacing (lower programmed rate of 80 bpm) compared to pacing at the standard programmed rate of 60 bpm on HRQoL in symptomatic AF patients undergoing pace-and-ablate strategy with LBBAP.

Secondary objectives:

* To study, in a subset of participants who give informed consent, the acute hemodynamic effect of accelerated pacing rates on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac output and arterial blood pressure, among AF patients undergoing a pace-and-ablate strategy with LBBAP.
* To study the long-term (6 months) effects of accelerated pacing among AF patients undergoing a pace-and-ablate strategy with LBBAP by measuring NT-proBNP levels, device detected AF-burden and daily activity, by evaluating HRQoL questionnaires (SF-36), and by assessing echocardiographic measurements (LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LAVI left atrial volume index; diastolic parameters; strain) compared to pacing at the standard of care lower rate of 60bpm.
* To investigate whether participants experience symptoms of accelerated pacing (such as palpitations), based on the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire, compared to standard of care.

Study design:

Randomized, single center, prospective, single blinded, parallel group, pilot-trial.

Study population:

Patients ≥ 18 years with symptomatic AF undergoing pace-and-ablate strategy.

Intervention:

\- 1:1 randomization to a lower rate of DDDR 80 bpm (intervention) or a lower rate of DDDR 60 bpm (control). Duration of the study is 6 months.

In a subset of participants:

\- Right heart catheterisation and invasive blood pressure measurements will be conducted to evaluate acute hemodynamic effects of different (accelerated) ventricular pacing rates during the standard of care AV node ablation.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary endpoint:

Difference in HRQoL between a lower rate of 80 bpm and a lower rate of 60 bpm, based on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), determined at 6 months follow-up.

Secondary endpoints:

* The acute hemodynamic effects of (accelerated) pacing at time of AVNA:

* Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)
* Cardiac Output (CO)
* Systemic arterial blood pressure
* The long-term effect of accelerated pacing on:

* HRQoL, based on the MLHFQ and SF-36 questionnaires.
* NT-proBNP levels
* Device detected AF burden
* Device detected daily activity comparing accelerated- vs control rate
* Echocardiographic measurements (LVEF, LVEDD, LVESD, LAVI, LA strain)
* Symptoms experienced as a result of (accelerated) pacing based on the AFEQT questionnaire

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Pacemaker DDD Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, single center, prospective, single blinded, parallel group, pilot-trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Accelerated pacing (lower rate pacemaker 80bpm)

Patients in the experimental arm will have their pacemaker programmed to a lower rate of 80bpm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Accelerated pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

The lower rate of the pacemaker will be programmed to 80 bpm in DDDR mode with mode switch to DDIR mode.

Current standard of care (lower rate pacemaker 60bpm)

Patients in the control arm will have their pacemaker programmed to a lower rate of 60bpm, which is the current standard of care.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Current standard of care

Intervention Type DEVICE

The lower rate of the pacemaker will be programmed to the current standard of care which is 60 bpm in DDDR mode with mode switch to DDIR mode.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Accelerated pacing

The lower rate of the pacemaker will be programmed to 80 bpm in DDDR mode with mode switch to DDIR mode.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Current standard of care

The lower rate of the pacemaker will be programmed to the current standard of care which is 60 bpm in DDDR mode with mode switch to DDIR mode.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults \> 18 years of age
* Referred for pace-and-ablate strategy with LBBAP for symptomatic AF
* Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40%.
* Willingness to participate, to understand the instructions and fill out the questionnaires, and ability to sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Infiltrative or constrictive cardiomyopathy (cardiac amyloidosis/sarcoidosis/ constrictive pericarditis)
* Severe Valvular heart disease (more than moderate valvular stenosis or regurgitation, aortic or mitral valve replacement)
* Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial
* Recent (\< 3 months) Myocardial infarction (MI), Transient Ischemic Attack or Cerebro- Vascular Accident
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kevin Vernooy, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+31433877095

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL86643.068.24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cardiac Anodal Biphasic Pacing
NCT07173777 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA