His-pacing and AV-node Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT04512586

Last Updated: 2025-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-02-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective To investigate if conduction system pacing ((CSP) i.e. atrioventricular node ablation + His bundle pacing or Left Bundle Branch pacing) is as good as (or better than) atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation for older patients (70-85yrs) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and at least moderately dilated left atrium.

Patient population:

90 patients aged 70-85 years with atrial fibrillation, referred to either AV node ablation or pulmonary vein isolation.

Primary endpoint:

Improvement in health-related quality of life as measured by the physical component summary (PCS) of the well-validated SF-36 form, at one year after AV node ablation + CSP or AF ablation.

Secondary endpoints:

Physical performance measured by 6-minute walk test, biochemical markers of heart failure (NT-ProBNP), frequency of complications, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and left atrial size evaluated after 12 months. Arrhythmia specific symptoms and anxiety will be measured with the ASTA and HADS questionnaires. Arrhythmia symptom correlation between subjective and objective findings. After three years, clinical endpoints will be evaluated regarding overall survival, and risk of heart failure hospitalization or death. The cost of the treatments will be compared, and estimated cost per quality adjusted year of life will be calculated, based on the EQ5D questionnaire.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Left Atrial Dilatation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients are randomized to either

1. Conduction system pacing via His-pacing electrode, in combination with AV node ablation
2. Pulmonary vein isolation ablation
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conduction System pacing plus AV node ablation

A His-pacing lead in combination with a backup RV pacing lead or an LBB pacing lead, and a right atrial lead (if needed) will be placed using standard technique. The His-pacing or LBB pacing lead will be Medtronic 3830, and the outer sheath will be either Medtronic C304 or C315 deflectable. If failure to implant with these tools, other leads and sheaths can be used at the discretion of the operator. A standard DDD pacemaker or CRT-P device from Medtronic will be used.

A minimum of three weeks post-implant, the device will be interrogated and His-bundle threshold will be evaluated. A threshold of ≤[email protected] is acceptable. If the device is well-functioning and successful His-pacing is documented, AV node ablation will be performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conduction System pacing and AV node ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

See study arm description.

Pulmonary vein isolation

Atrial fibrillation will be performed as a complete pulmonary vein isolation. Either Cryoballon or radio frequency ablation with irrigated tip contact force enabled catheter can be used. Pulsed field ablation can be used if available. Endpoint is complete electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins, verified by entry- and exit block using a multipolar catheter during pacing.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Atrial fibrillation ablation by pulmonary vein isolation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

See study arm description

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conduction System pacing and AV node ablation

See study arm description.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Atrial fibrillation ablation by pulmonary vein isolation

See study arm description

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Indication for invasive treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation according to current guidelines
* LVEF \>35%
* Age 70-85 years
* Persistent atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with at least moderate enlargement of the left atrium (≥42ml/m2)
* Chronic and well-tolerated treatment with anticoagulants (either non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist)
* Willingness to participate, to understand the instructions and fill out the questionnaires, and ability to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic atrial fibrillation with \>1 year duration
* BMI \>40kg/m2
* Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
* Severe heart failure with symptoms ≥ NYHA class IIIb
* Heart amyloidosis
* Cardiac sarcoidosis
* Recent (\<3 months) myocardial infarction
* Significant heart valve disease (pronounced insufficiency or stenosis)
* Pacemaker or ICD treatment ongoing, or current pacemaker indication
* Congenital heart disease that required surgical correction
* Comorbidity that is assessed significantly affect the patient's quality of life over the next year, or 3-year survival
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Skane

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rasmus Borgquist, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Arrhythmia Section, Lund, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Linköping University

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Skane University Hospital

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm Arrhythmia Center

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Varberg Hospital

Varberg, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

His_PAAF_study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.