Physiological Ventricular Pacing Vs Managed Ventricular Pacing for Persistent AF Prevention in Prolonged AV Interval

NCT ID: NCT05367037

Last Updated: 2025-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

640 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-27

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A multicenter, prospective, randomized study in a 1:1 ratio, single-blind with double-blind evaluation to evaluate the superiority of physiological ventricular pacing (proposed modality) vs. managed ventricular pacing (control) for prevention of persistent AF (PeAF) occurrence in patients with prolonged atrioventricular interval (PR≥180 ms) and indication for pacing: sinus node disease and/or paroxysmal type 1 or 2-second degree AV block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study aim: Evaluate the superiority of physiological ventricular pacing (proposed modality) vs. managed ventricular pacing (control) for prevention of persistent AF (PeAF) occurrence in patients with prolonged atrioventricular interval (PR≥180 ms) and indication for pacing: sinus node disease and/or paroxysmal type 1 or 2-second degree AV block. If the efficacy superiority is confirmed, this pacing mode may be considered to reduce the occurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation in this group of patients.

Study design: Independent, multicenter, prospective, randomized study in a 1:1 ratio, single-blind with double-blind evaluation (the actual evaluator of the primary endpoint is the pacemaker device's internal diagnostic algorithm, without intervention by the Investigator). This study will use only CE-marked devices already part of clinical practice.

Groups:

* PhysioVP group: the Physiological Ventricular Pacing is achieved by delivering a pacing stimulus to a cardiac conduction structure, such as the bundle of His or left bundle branch of the His-Purkinje system, with a permanent lead. PhysioVP activates the heart through the native His-Purkinje conduction system, thus offering the most physiologic pacing approach to correct the PR interval and avoiding pacing-induced dyssynchrony.
* DDD-VPA group: In managed ventricular pacing, the right ventricular (RV) lead is implanted in the myocardial right ventricular (septum or apex). In this pacing mode, the ventricular pacing is minimized by using algorithms for right Ventricular Pacing Avoidance.

Devices used:

* PhysioVP group: a specialized delivery sheath for His-Purkinje system pacing with appropriate or standard leads will be used.
* DDD-VPA group: the RV leads will be implanted in the standard right ventricular myocardial sites (septum or apex) using standard bipolar active-fixation leads.

The atrial leads will be placed in the right atrial appendage in both groups. The 13 participating Italian Clinical Centers are proven experience in the PM implantation procedures used in the study.

Enrolled patients will be monitored by in-office clinical checks at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months and by home monitoring at 6, 18, and 30 months after implantation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sinus Node Disease Atrioventricular; Block, Second Degree (Types I and II)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

a prospective, randomized study in a 1:1 ratio, single-blind with double-blind evaluation (the actual evaluator of the primary endpoint is the pacemaker device's internal diagnostic algorithm, without intervention by the Investigator)
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
single-blind with double-blind evaluation (the actual evaluator of the primary endpoint is the pacemaker device's internal diagnostic algorithm, without intervention by the Investigator)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PhysioVP group

Physiological ventricular pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PhysioVP

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Physiological ventricular pacing is achieved by delivering a stimulus to a cardiac conduction structure, such as the bundle of His or left bundle branch of the His-Purkinje system, with a permanent lead. PhysioVP activates the heart through the native His-Purkinje conduction system, thus offering the most physiologic pacing approach to correct the PR interval and avoiding pacing-induced dyssynchrony. A specialized delivery sheath for His-Purkinje system pacing with appropriate or standard leads will be used. The atrial leads will be implanted in the right atrial appendage and will connect the leads to the standard dual-chamber PM. By continuously recording a 12-lead ECG, we determine whether cardiac conduction structure, such as the bundle of His or left bundle branch of the His-Purkinje system, will be achieved.

DDD-VPA group

Dual-chamber pacing with the addition of algorithms for ventricular pacing avoidance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DDD-VPA

Intervention Type DEVICE

In dual-chamber pacing with the addition of algorithms for ventricular pacing avoidance, also called managed ventricular pacing, the right ventricular (RV) lead is implanted in the myocardial right ventricular (septum or apex). In this pacing mode, the ventricular pacing is minimized by using algorithms for right ventricular pacing avoidance. Therefore, the RV leads will be implanted in the right ventricular myocardial sites (septum or apex) and standard bipolar active or passive fixation leads. In addition, the atrial leads will be implanted in the right atrial appendage and connect leads to the standard dual-chamber PM.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PhysioVP

The Physiological ventricular pacing is achieved by delivering a stimulus to a cardiac conduction structure, such as the bundle of His or left bundle branch of the His-Purkinje system, with a permanent lead. PhysioVP activates the heart through the native His-Purkinje conduction system, thus offering the most physiologic pacing approach to correct the PR interval and avoiding pacing-induced dyssynchrony. A specialized delivery sheath for His-Purkinje system pacing with appropriate or standard leads will be used. The atrial leads will be implanted in the right atrial appendage and will connect the leads to the standard dual-chamber PM. By continuously recording a 12-lead ECG, we determine whether cardiac conduction structure, such as the bundle of His or left bundle branch of the His-Purkinje system, will be achieved.

Intervention Type DEVICE

DDD-VPA

In dual-chamber pacing with the addition of algorithms for ventricular pacing avoidance, also called managed ventricular pacing, the right ventricular (RV) lead is implanted in the myocardial right ventricular (septum or apex). In this pacing mode, the ventricular pacing is minimized by using algorithms for right ventricular pacing avoidance. Therefore, the RV leads will be implanted in the right ventricular myocardial sites (septum or apex) and standard bipolar active or passive fixation leads. In addition, the atrial leads will be implanted in the right atrial appendage and connect leads to the standard dual-chamber PM.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

18 years older patients, able to express Informed Consent, with prolonged atrioventricular interval (PR\>180 ms) and one of the following indications for PM implantation according to current guidelines:

* Sinus node disease.
* Paroxysmal type1or 2 second-degree AV-block.

Exclusion Criteria

* Candidacy for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.
* Severe grade mitral or aortic regurgitation/stenosis.
* Atrial fibrillation ablation (left pulmonary veins).
* Cardiac surgery \< 3 months before PM implantation.
* History of long-standing persistent AF.
* Permanent third-degree AV block.
* Participation in another clinical trial in the past 3 months.
* Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant.
* Life expectancy of \< 3 years.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Quovadis Associazione

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gianni Pastore, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cardiology Unit, "S.Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, Rovigo, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Elettrofisiologia, Cardiologia, Ospedale di Rovigo

Rovigo, Veneto, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gianni Pastore, MD

Role: CONTACT

‭+39 (339) 754-4514‬

Franco Noventa, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Gianni Pastore, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pastore G, Bertini M, Bonanno C, Coluccia G, Dell'Era G, De Mattia L, Grieco D, Katsouras G, Maines M, Marcantoni L, Marinaccio L, Paglino G, Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Zoppo F, Noventa F. The PhysioVP-AF study, a randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical benefit of physiological ventricular pacing vs. managed ventricular pacing for persistent atrial fibrillation prevention in patients with prolonged atrioventricular conduction: design and rationale. Europace. 2023 May 19;25(5):euad082. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad082.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36974970 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PhysioVP-AF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.